IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p6228-d1116124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GIS-Based Sustainable Accessibility Mapping of Urban Parks: Evidence from the Second Largest Settlement of Sindh, Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Shabir Hussain Khahro

    (Department of Engineering Management, College of Engineering, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan)

  • Musrat Gul Bhellar

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan)

  • Gopal Das

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan)

  • Haris Shaikh

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan)

  • Basel Sultan

    (Department of Engineering Management, College of Engineering, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Hyderabad’s recreational amenities have made limited progress in comparison to the development of its industrial and commercial sectors. People require parks to unwind from their hectic lives. Parks can be a healthy location to host social events and can enhance community bonds. The evaluation of park accessibility has not been considered over the years in Hyderabad. Hyderabad is the eighth largest settlement in Pakistan and the second largest in the Sindh province. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the spatial accessibility of the urban parks situated in the city’s distinct locations. The spatial distribution of parks throughout the city was determined in this research. This study evaluated how accessible urban parks are to users by conducting a buffer analysis with ArcGIS-10.8. The questionnaire survey was conducted to record the participants’ opinions about the existing conditions of the parks with a sample size of 400. There was a total of 28 inaccessible urban parks found in Hyderabad. The total facility coverage was decided to be 0.80%. This value is extremely low as per local standards. Therefore, this study recommends the planned development of 40–45 parks to reach the standard level of 18% of the park coverage area. This study suggests that government officials should take pivotal measures to better maintain parks. This research is significant in the advanced modern world because natural areas, such as parks, can offer social and psychological benefits to society. The accessibility of parks is essential for the prosperity of citizens and the achievement of sustainable development goals. The findings of this research may contribute to SDGs 3 and 11, i.e., good health and well-being and sustainable cities and communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Shabir Hussain Khahro & Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur & Musrat Gul Bhellar & Gopal Das & Haris Shaikh & Basel Sultan, 2023. "GIS-Based Sustainable Accessibility Mapping of Urban Parks: Evidence from the Second Largest Settlement of Sindh, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-27, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6228-:d:1116124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6228/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6228/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Young-Chang Lee & Keun-Ho Kim, 2015. "Attitudes of Citizens towards Urban Parks and Green Spaces for Urban Sustainability: The Case of Gyeongsan City, Republic of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Mihaela Constantinescu & Andreea Orîndaru & Ștefan-Claudiu Căescu & Andreea Pachițanu, 2019. "Sustainable Development of Urban Green Areas for Quality of Life Improvement—Argument for Increased Citizen Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Shu Feng & Liding Chen & Ranhao Sun & Zhiqiang Feng & Junran Li & Muhammad Sadiq Khan & Yongcai Jing, 2019. "The Distribution and Accessibility of Urban Parks in Beijing, China: Implications of Social Equity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Syed Atif Bokhari & Zafeer Saqib & Sarah Amir & Salman Naseer & Muhammad Shafiq & Amjad Ali & Muhammad Zaman-ul-Haq & Azeem Irshad & Habib Hamam, 2022. "Assessing Land Cover Transformation for Urban Environmental Sustainability through Satellite Sensing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Levent, Tuzin Baycan & Nijkamp, Peter, 2004. "Urban Green Space Policies : A Comparative Study on Performance and Success Conditions in European Cities," Serie Research Memoranda 0022, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    6. Yizhen Ding & Dongying Li & Huiyan Sang, 2022. "Park Characteristics and Changes in Park Visitation before, during, and after COVID-19 Shelter-in-Place Order," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Weiyi Yu & Bindong Sun & Hong Hu, 2019. "Sustainable Development Research on the Spatial Differences in the Elderly Suitability of Shanghai Urban Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Fariba Bahriny & Simon Bell, 2020. "Patterns of Urban Park Use and Their Relationship to Factors of Quality: A Case Study of Tehran, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-33, February.
    9. Quxiao Chen & Chen Wang & Ge Lou & Mingyu Zhang & Shuang Wu, 2019. "Measurement of Urban Park Accessibility from the Quasi-Public Goods Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Fahad Ahmed Shaikh & Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur & Imtiaz Ahmed Chandio & Saima Kalwar, 2022. "Factors Influencing Residential Location Choice towards Mixed Land-Use Development: An Empirical Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, November.
    11. Kichan Kim & Chang Kil Lee & Hyun Woo Kim, 2022. "Understanding the Accessibility of Urban Parks and Connectivity of Green Spaces in Single-Person Household Distribution: Case Study of Incheon, South Korea," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Tüzin Baycan-Levent & Peter Nijkamp, 2004. "Urban Green Space Policies: Performance and Success Conditions in European Cities," ERSA conference papers ersa04p660, European Regional Science Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur & Shabir Hussain Khahro & Muhammad Saad Khan & Fahad Ahmed Shaikh & Yasir Javed, 2024. "Aftermaths of COVID-19 Lockdown on Socioeconomic and Psychological Nexus of Urban Population: A Case in Hyderabad, Pakistan," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Yanhong Zou & Jingya Shen & Yuying Chen & Baoyi Zhang, 2023. "Monitoring Urban Expansion (2000–2020) in Yangtze River Delta Using Time-Series Nighttime Light Data and MODIS NDVI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Xuefei Guo & Lijun Zhu & Yuansheng Tang & Zhijun Li, 2023. "Increased Humidity Improved Desert Riparian Ecosystems in the Tarim River Basin, Northwest China, from 1990 to 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Musrat Gul Bhellar & Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur & Shabir Hussain Khahro & Tauha Hussain Ali & Yasir Javed, 2023. "Visualizing Travel Accessibility in a Congested City Center: A GIS-Based Isochrone Model and Trip Rate Analysis Considering Sustainable Transportation Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Zhipeng Xing & Sidong Zhao & Kerun Li, 2023. "Evolution Pattern and Spatial Mismatch of Urban Greenspace and Its Impact Mechanism: Evidence from Parkland of Hunan Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-31, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joanna Wysmułek & Maria Hełdak & Anatolii Kucher, 2020. "The Analysis of Green Areas’ Accessibility in Comparison with Statistical Data in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Wang Chang & Yun Zhu & Che-Jen Lin & Saravanan Arunachalam & Shuxiao Wang & Jia Xing & Tingting Fang & Shicheng Long & Jinying Li & Geng Chen, 2022. "Environmental Justice Assessment of Fine Particles, Ozone, and Mercury over the Pearl River Delta Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Sapan Tiwari & Neema Nassir & Patricia Sauri Lavieri, 2024. "Smart Insertion Strategies for Sustainable Operation of Shared Autonomous Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-28, June.
    4. Zihan Cai & Sidong Zhao & Mengshi Huang & Congguo Zhang, 2023. "Evolution Model, Mechanism, and Performance of Urban Park Green Areas in the Grand Canal of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, December.
    5. Hamidreza Rabiei‐Dastjerdi & Stephen A. Matthews, 2021. "Who gets what, where, and how much? Composite index of spatial inequality for small areas in Tehran," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 191-205, February.
    6. Emad B. Dawwas & Karen Dyson, 2021. "COVID-19 Changed Human-Nature Interactions across Green Space Types: Evidence of Change in Multiple Types of Activities from the West Bank, Palestine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Ding, Yue & Wang, Xiaokun (Cara) & Pérez-Guzmán, Sofía & Wojtowicz, Jeffrey & Conway, Alison, 2024. "Multi-criteria assessment and ranking framework for the potential of cargo cycle operation: Using New York city as an example," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Tanmoy Malaker & Qingmin Meng, 2024. "Urban Disparity Analytics Using GIS: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Agnieszka Mandziuk & Dagmara Stangierska & Beata Fornal-Pieniak & Jerzy Gębski & Barbara Żarska & Marta Kiraga, 2022. "Preferences of Young Adults concerning the Pocket Parks with Water Reservoirs in the Aspect of Willingness to Pay (WTP) in Warsaw City, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Chen Zhang & Nan Zhang & Peijuan Zhu & Shuqian Qin & Yong Zhang, 2024. "The Evolution and Driving Mechanisms of the Blue-Green Space Publicness Pattern in Changsha, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Ruixue Liu & Jing Xiao, 2020. "Factors Affecting Users’ Satisfaction with Urban Parks through Online Comments Data: Evidence from Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Giuseppe Salvia & Irene Pluchinotta & Ioanna Tsoulou & Gemma Moore & Nici Zimmermann, 2022. "Understanding Urban Green Space Usage through Systems Thinking: A Case Study in Thamesmead, London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, February.
    13. Kaiwen Su & Jie Ren & Chuyun Cui & Yilei Hou & Yali Wen, 2022. "Do Value Orientations and Beliefs Play a Positive Role in Shaping Personal Norms for Urban Green Space Conservation?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Maria Stella Righettini, 2021. "Framing Sustainability. Evidence from Participatory Forums to Taylor the Regional 2030 Agenda to Local Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Abdullah Addas & Ahmad Maghrabi, 2020. "A Proposed Planning Concept for Public Open Space Provision in Saudi Arabia: A Study of Three Saudi Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-36, August.
    16. Liang, Huilin & Yan, Yujia & Yan, Qi & Zhang, Qingping, 2024. "Development of green space provision for housing estates at metropolitan scale: A spatiotemporal assessment of proximity in a rapidly urbanizing Chinese city during the last 10 years," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    17. Kukulska-Kozieł, Anita & Noszczyk, Tomasz & Gorzelany, Julia & Młocek, Wojciech, 2024. "Greenery in times of crisis: Accessibility, residents' travel preferences and the impact of travel time," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    18. Angeliki Paraskevopoulou & Andreas Klados & Chrysovalantis Malesios, 2020. "Historical Public Parks: Investigating Contemporary Visitor Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, November.
    19. Yang Yang & Zhifang Wang & Guangsi Lin, 2021. "Performance Assessment Indicators for Comparing Recreational Services of Urban Parks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Xinyang Li & Marek Kozlowski & Sumarni Binti Ismail & Sarah Abdulkareem Salih, 2024. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Leisure Urban Spaces and the Correlation with Population Activity Intensity: A Case Study of Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6228-:d:1116124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.