IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v6y2014i7p4077-4101d37620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in the Mineral Industry: Evidence from Chinese Mineral Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Xiping Pan

    (School of Humanities & Economic Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and Environment, Ministry of Land and Resource, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jinghua Sha

    (School of Humanities & Economic Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and Environment, Ministry of Land and Resource, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Hongliang Zhang

    (School of Humanities & Economic Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    School of Economics and Management, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China)

  • Wenlan Ke

    (School of Humanities & Economic Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and Environment, Ministry of Land and Resource, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Financial Performance (CFP) using panel data for 228 Chinese mineral listed firms from 2010 to 2013 with Pooled Least Squares regression analysis. Our study considers five different sublevel CSR issues—shareholder responsibility, employee responsibility, environmental responsibility, public responsibility, and supplier, customer and consumer responsibility—in capturing the effects of CSR elements on CFP. The estimation results show the different effects of each sublevel CSR issue on CFP. Overall, shareholder, employee responsibility, environmental responsibility, supplier, customer and consumer responsibility have significant relationships with CFP, which are the stakeholders who have the closest linkage with firm operations. Meanwhile, public responsibility outside the firm does not show significant interaction with CFP, which is why many mineral firms ignore the public interest and this leads to conflicts. Shareholder responsibility has the most significant positive effect on CFP. Supplier, customer and consumer responsibility and environmental responsibility usually have negative effects on CFP as costs increase. Moreover, all 228 listed mineral firms that were selected in this paper have been classified into five sub-sectors: the extractive industry, metal fabrication industry, oil and gas industry, gas and water-related industry, and oil-producing equipment industry, based on the Industry Classification Benchmark (ICB). Our study shows that the differences in the relationship between CSR and CFP for five sublevel industries are due to industry characteristics. If the government wants to solve these conflicts and positively encourage firms to adopt CSR, it is necessary to create a mining development environment whereby firm profits are closely tied to CSR.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiping Pan & Jinghua Sha & Hongliang Zhang & Wenlan Ke, 2014. "Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in the Mineral Industry: Evidence from Chinese Mineral Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:7:p:4077-4101:d:37620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/7/4077/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/7/4077/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Peter K.C. & Lau, Antonio K.W. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2013. "Employee rights protection and financial performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1861-1869.
    2. Nadeem Iqbal & Naveed Ahmad & Nauman Ahmad Basheer & Muhammad Nadeem, 2012. "Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance of Corporations: Evidence from Pakistan," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(6), pages 107-118, December.
    3. Wu, Meng-Wen & Shen, Chung-Hua, 2013. "Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 3529-3547.
    4. Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 32-42, January.
    5. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    6. Jędrzej G. Frynas, 2008. "Corporate Social Responsibility and International Development: Critical Assessment," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(4), pages 274-281, July.
    7. Hilson, Gavin, 2012. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the extractive industries: Experiences from developing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 131-137.
    8. Nikolaos Sariannidis & Eleni Zafeiriou & Grigoris Giannarakis & Garyfallos Arabatzis, 2013. "CO2 Emissions and Financial Performance of Socially Responsible Firms: An Empirical Survey," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 109-120, February.
    9. Scholtens, Bert, 2008. "A note on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 46-55, December.
    10. Milton Friedman, 2007. "The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits," Springer Books, in: Walther Ch Zimmerli & Markus Holzinger & Klaus Richter (ed.), Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance, pages 173-178, Springer.
    11. Stuart L. Hart & Gautam Ahuja, 1996. "Does It Pay To Be Green? An Empirical Examination Of The Relationship Between Emission Reduction And Firm Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 30-37, March.
    12. Chih-Wei Peng & Mei-Ling Yang, 2014. "The Effect of Corporate Social Performance on Financial Performance: The Moderating Effect of Ownership Concentration," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 171-182, August.
    13. Iwata, Hiroki & Okada, Keisuke, 2011. "How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1691-1700, July.
    14. Parket, I. Robert & Eilbirt, Henry, 1975. "The practice of business social responsibility: the underlying factors," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 5-10, August.
    15. Ackah-Baidoo, Abigail, 2012. "Enclave development and ‘offshore corporate social responsibility’: Implications for oil-rich sub-Saharan Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 152-159.
    16. Zhihong Wang & Joseph Sarkis, 2013. "Investigating the relationship of sustainable supply chain management with corporate financial performance," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 62(8), pages 871-888, October.
    17. Amalendu Bhunia, 2012. "Association between corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance: empirical evidence from bombay stock exchange," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(2), pages 1-20.
    18. Lioui, Abraham & Sharma, Zenu, 2012. "Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Disentangling direct and indirect effects," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 100-111.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kun Su, 2019. "Does religion benefit corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1206-1221, November.
    2. Justyna Fijałkowska & Beata Zyznarska-Dworczak & Przemysław Garsztka, 2018. "Corporate Social-Environmental Performance versus Financial Performance of Banks in Central and Eastern European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Xuetong Wang & Wenyong Lai & Xiangnan Song & Chen Lu, 2018. "Implementation Efficiency of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Construction Industry: A China Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Fan, Songmei & Yan, Jingjing & Sha, Jinghua, 2017. "Innovation and economic growth in the mining industry: Evidence from China's listed companies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 25-42.
    5. Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Nina Rung-Hoch, 2017. "Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation in Family Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Elena Dobre & Georgiana Oana Stanila & Laura Brad, 2015. "The Influence of Environmental and Social Performance on Financial Performance: Evidence from Romania’s Listed Entities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-41, March.
    7. Minghui Yang & Paulo Bento & Ahsan Akbar, 2019. "Does CSR Influence Firm Performance Indicators? Evidence from Chinese Pharmaceutical Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Tatjana Tambovceva & Jelena Titko, 2020. "Consumer perception of sharing economy: pilot survey in Latvia," International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 72-84.
    9. Liliana Nicoleta Simionescu & Dalina Dumitrescu, 2018. "Empirical Study towards Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Company Financial Performance. Evidence for Companies Listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Yi Zhang & Qianqian Shang & Chun Liu, 2018. "FDI Spillovers on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Channel of Labor Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    11. Jyotirani Gupta & Niladri Das, 2022. "Multidimensional corporate social responsibility disclosure and financial performance: A meta‐analytical review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 731-748, July.
    12. Dr. Muhammad Siddique & Dr. Muhammad Sarfraz Khan & Dr. Kamran Ali & Zunaira Maqsood, 2023. "Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Financial Performance: Evidence from Insurance Sector of Pakistan," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(3), pages 1-14.
    13. Wan, Peng & Chen, Xiangyu & Ke, Yun & Dong, Wang, 2024. "Does local government debt affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PB), pages 334-348.
    14. Eduardo Ortas & Igor Álvarez & Ainhoa Garayar, 2015. "The Environmental, Social, Governance, and Financial Performance Effects on Companies that Adopt the United Nations Global Compact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-25, February.
    15. Hong Yuh Ching & Fábio Gerab & Thiago Henrique Toste, 2017. "The Quality of Sustainability Reports and Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence From Brazilian Listed Companies," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, June.
    16. Ruiqian Li & Ramakrishnan Ramanathan, 2018. "Impacts of Industrial Heterogeneity and Technical Innovation on the Relationship between Environmental Performance and Financial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, May.
    17. Maryam Mangantar, 2019. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance on Banking Financial Performance," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 95-105.
    18. Progress Choongo, 2017. "A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Performance in SMEs in Zambia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Saeid Homayoun & Bita Mashayekhi & Amin Jahangard & Milad Samavat & Zabihollah Rezaee, 2023. "The Controversial Link between CSR and Financial Performance: The Mediating Role of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, July.
    20. Markus Hang & Jerome Geyer‐Klingeberg & Andreas W. Rathgeber, 2019. "It is merely a matter of time: A meta‐analysis of the causality between environmental performance and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 257-273, February.
    21. Feng, Yumei & Pan, Yuying & Wang, Lu & Sensoy, Ahmet, 2021. "The voice of minority shareholders: Online voting and corporate social responsibility," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    22. Jelle Schepers & Wim Voordeckers & Tensie Steijvers & Eddy Laveren, 2020. "Long-Term Orientation as a Resource for Entrepreneurial Orientation in Private Family Firms: The Need for Participative Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-22, July.
    23. Qianqian Hu & Tianlun Zhu & Chien-Liang Lin & Tiejun Chen & Tachia Chin, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance in China’s Manufacturing: A Global Perspective of Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    24. Hirofumi Fukuyama & Yong Tan, 2022. "Deconstructing three‐stage overall efficiency into input, output and stability efficiency components with consideration of market power and loan loss provision: An application to Chinese banks," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 953-974, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Łukasz Matuszak & Ewa Różańska, 2019. "A Non-Linear and Disaggregated Approach to Studying the Impact of CSR on Accounting Profitability: Evidence from the Polish Banking Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Jorge Alejandro Silva, 2024. "Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Sustainability in Water Supply: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-29, April.
    3. Sohail Ahmad Javeed & Tze San Ong & Rashid Latief & Haslinah Muhamad & Wei Ni Soh, 2021. "Conceptualizing the Moderating Role of CEO Power and Ownership Concentration in the Relationship between Audit Committee and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Elena Dobre & Georgiana Oana Stanila & Laura Brad, 2015. "The Influence of Environmental and Social Performance on Financial Performance: Evidence from Romania’s Listed Entities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-41, March.
    5. Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Saeid Homayoun, 2020. "Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Francesco Gangi & Antonio Meles & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 529-547, May.
    7. Bai Xue & Zhuang Zhang & Pingli Li, 2020. "Corporate environmental performance, environmental management and firm risk," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1074-1096, March.
    8. Jung-Fa Tsai & Phi-Hung Nguyen & Ming-Hua Lin & Duy-Van Nguyen & Hsu-Hao Lin & Anh-Tuan Ngo, 2021. "Impacts of Environmental Certificate and Pollution Abatement Equipment on SMEs’ Performance: An Empirical Case in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Witold J. Henisz & Sinziana Dorobantu & Lite J. Nartey, 2014. "Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(12), pages 1727-1748, December.
    10. Tzouvanas, Panagiotis & Kizys, Renatas & Chatziantoniou, Ioannis & Sagitova, Roza, 2020. "Environmental and financial performance in the European manufacturing sector: An analysis of extreme tail dependency," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    11. Ni, Xiaoran & Song, Wei & Yao, Jiaquan, 2020. "Stakeholder orientation and corporate payout policy: Insights from state legal shocks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    12. Glavas, Dejan & Bancel, Franck, 2018. "Are Agency Problems a Determinant of Green Bond Issuance?," MPRA Paper 88377, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Francesco Gangi & Jérôme Méric & Rémi Jardat & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Business for society," Post-Print hal-02382307, HAL.
    14. Ben Lahouel, Béchir & Ben Zaied, Younes & Managi, Shunsuke & Taleb, Lotfi, 2022. "Re-thinking about U: The relevance of regime-switching model in the relationship between environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 498-519.
    15. Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán & Nicola Raimo & Filippo Vitolla & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, 2024. "Corporate governance and financial performance: Reframing their relationship in the context of climate change," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1493-1509, May.
    16. Pham, Huy & Ha, Van & Le, Hanh-Hong & Ramiah, Vikash & Frino, Alex, 2024. "The effects of polluting behaviour, dirty energy and electricity consumption on firm performance: Evidence from the recent crises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    17. Pi‐Hui Ting & Hsien‐yu Yin, 2018. "How do corporate social responsibility activities affect performance? The role of excess control right," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1320-1331, November.
    18. Bilal Fayiz Omar & Nidal Omar Zallom, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility and market value: evidence from Jordan," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(1), pages 2-29, July.
    19. Li, Changhong & Xu, Yuan & Gill, Amarjit & Haider, Zulfiquer Ali & Wang, Yuan, 2019. "Religious beliefs, socially responsible investment, and cost of debt: Evidence from entrepreneurial firms in India," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 102-114.
    20. Faria, João Ricardo & Tindall, Greg & Terjesen, Siri, 2022. "The Green Tobin's q: theory and evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:7:p:4077-4101:d:37620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.