IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v4y2012i6p1188-1213d18238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unveiling the Process of Sustainable Renovation

Author

Listed:
  • Liane Thuvander

    (Department of Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology, Sven Hultins Gata 6, Göteborg SE-412 96, Sweden)

  • Paula Femenías

    (Department of Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology, Sven Hultins Gata 6, Göteborg SE-412 96, Sweden)

  • Kristina Mjörnell

    (Energy Technology, SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Borås SE-501 15, Sweden)

  • Pär Meiling

    (Department of Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology, Sven Hultins Gata 6, Göteborg SE-412 96, Sweden)

Abstract

Renovation processes are complex and there is a risk of underestimating architectural, cultural, and social values in favor of exterior and interior upgrading, energy efficiency and financing. A synthesized, systematic process is needed for making decisions about renovation measures. The aim of this paper is to survey decision-making procedures aimed for sustainable renovation. We inventory existing tools and methodologies based on (a) a literature review and (b) results from a workshop with participants from the Swedish buildings sector, academia, and other stakeholders. Our results show that there are many tools available but few seem to have reached acceptance in renovation. None of the more established methods and tools addresses a complexity that balances material and immaterial values and they are often too specific. There is a need for simplified tools, especially for evaluating more intangible, experienced values. Instead of one comprehensive tool preferably a methodology for renovation should be developed with references to different tools. In the building sector, renovation should be considered a service-minded process rather than a merely technical one as often is the case in new construction. There is a need to clarify the process and the meaning of the terms, and that need is even more urgent when it comes to the values that are more difficult to define.

Suggested Citation

  • Liane Thuvander & Paula Femenías & Kristina Mjörnell & Pär Meiling, 2012. "Unveiling the Process of Sustainable Renovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-26, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:4:y:2012:i:6:p:1188-1213:d:18238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/6/1188/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/6/1188/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malmqvist, Tove & Glaumann, Mauritz & Svenfelt, Åsa & Carlson, Per-Olof & Erlandsson, Martin & Andersson, Johnny & Wintzell, Helene & Finnveden, Göran & Lindholm, Torbjörn & Malmström, Tor-Göran, 2011. "A Swedish environmental rating tool for buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1893-1899.
    2. Ulf Borelius & Ulla-Britt Wennerström, 2009. "A New Gårdsten: A Case Study of a Swedish Municipal Housing Company," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 223-239.
    3. Egmond, C. & Jonkers, R. & Kok, G., 2005. "A strategy to encourage housing associations to invest in energy conservation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(18), pages 2374-2384, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haolan Liao & Rong Ren & Lu Li, 2023. "Existing Building Renovation: A Review of Barriers to Economic and Environmental Benefits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Petter Wallentén & Kristina Mjörnell, 2021. "SIRen: An Applied Framework for a Sustainable Renovation Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Kristina Mjörnell & Anna Boss & Markus Lindahl & Stefan Molnar, 2014. "A Tool to Evaluate Different Renovation Alternatives with Regard to Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Ju Liu & Bo Bengtsson & Helena Bohman & Karin Staffansson Pauli, 2020. "A System Model and An Innovation Approach toward Sustainable Housing Renovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Wang, Zhaohua & Liu, Qiang & Zhang, Bin, 2022. "What kinds of building energy-saving retrofit projects should be preferred? Efficiency evaluation with three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    6. Karin Staffansson Pauli & Ju Liu & Bo Bengtsson, 2020. "Sustainable Strategy in Housing Renovation: Moving from a Technology-and-Engineering-Focused Model to a User-Oriented Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Säwén, Toivo & Sasic Kalagasidis, Angela & Hollberg, Alexander, 2024. "Critical perspectives on life cycle building performance assessment tool reviews," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    8. Per Anker Jensen & Esmir Maslesa & Jakob Brinkø Berg, 2018. "Sustainable Building Renovation: Proposals for a Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Hermano Bernardo & Adélio Gaspar & Carlos Henggeler Antunes, 2018. "A Combined Value Focused Thinking-Soft Systems Methodology Approach to Structure Decision Support for Energy Performance Assessment of School Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Guirec Ruellan & Mario Cools & Shady Attia, 2021. "Analysis of the Determining Factors for the Renovation of the Walloon Residential Building Stock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Kristina Mjörnell & Jenny von Platten & Kicki Björklund, 2022. "Balancing Social and Economic Sustainability in Renovation with an Affordable Option for Tenants? A Pilot Study from Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Kwonsik Song & Yonghan Ahn & Joseph Ahn & Nahyun Kwon, 2019. "Development of an Energy Saving Strategy Model for Retrofitting Existing Buildings: A Korean Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Hans Lind & Kerstin Annadotter & Folke Björk & Lovisa Högberg & Tord Af Klintberg, 2016. "Sustainable Renovation Strategy in the Swedish Million Homes Programme: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, April.
    14. Linus Malmgren & Kristina Mjörnell, 2015. "Application of a Decision Support Tool in Three Renovation Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Åsa Wahlström & Björn Berggren & Josefin Florell & Rickard Nygren & Thomas Sundén, 2016. "Decision Making Process for Constructing Low-Energy Buildings in the Public Housing Sector in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-20, October.
    16. Stefan Olsson & Tove Malmqvist & Mauritz Glaumann, 2015. "Managing Sustainability Aspects in Renovation Processes: Interview Study and Outline of a Process Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Kristina Mjörnell & Paula Femenías & Kerstin Annadotter, 2019. "Renovation Strategies for Multi-Residential Buildings from the Record Years in Sweden—Profit-Driven or Socioeconomically Responsible?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Alaa Khadra & Mårten Hugosson & Jan Akander & Jonn Are Myhren, 2020. "Development of a Weight Factor Method for Sustainability Decisions in Building Renovation. Case Study Using Renobuild," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-15, September.
    19. Rosa Ana Jiménez-Expósito & Antonio Serrano-Jiménez & Pablo Fernández-Ans & Gianluca Stasi & Carmen Díaz-López & Ángela Barrios-Padura, 2022. "Promoting Sustainable and Resilient Constructive Patterns in Vulnerable Communities: Habitat for Humanity’s Sustainable Housing Prototypes in El Salvador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Lind, Hans & Annadotter, Kerstin & Björk, Folke & Högberg, Lovisa & af Klintberg, Tord, 2014. "Sustainable renovation strategy in the Swedish Million Homes Programme: A case study," Working Paper Series 14/2, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management & Banking and Finance.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chandratilake, S.R. & Dias, W.P.S., 2013. "Sustainability rating systems for buildings: Comparisons and correlations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 22-28.
    2. Qingsong Wang & Ping Liu & Xueliang Yuan & Xingxing Cheng & Rujian Ma & Ruimin Mu & Jian Zuo, 2015. "Structural Evolution of Household Energy Consumption: A China Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Huang, Cui & Yang, Chao & Su, Jun, 2021. "Identifying core policy instruments based on structural holes: A case study of China’s nuclear energy policy," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2).
    4. Stefan Olsson & Tove Malmqvist & Mauritz Glaumann, 2015. "Managing Sustainability Aspects in Renovation Processes: Interview Study and Outline of a Process Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Kok, Gerjo & Lo, Siu Hing & Peters, Gjalt-Jorn Y. & Ruiter, Robert A.C., 2011. "Changing energy-related behavior: An Intervention Mapping approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5280-5286, September.
    6. Long Xia & Lulu Chai & Xiaoyun Feng & Yuehong Wei & Hanyu Zhang, 2024. "Research on the Driving Factors and Policy Guidance for a Reduction in Electricity Consumption by Urban Residents," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Muhammad Yaseen Bhutto & Xiaohui Liu & Yasir Ali Soomro & Myriam Ertz & Yasser Baeshen, 2020. "Adoption of Energy-Efficient Home Appliances: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    8. Egmond, C. & Jonkers, R. & Kok, G., 2006. "A strategy and protocol to increase diffusion of energy related innovations into the mainstream of housing associations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(18), pages 4042-4049, December.
    9. Fellesson, Markus, 2011. "Enacting customers--Marketing discourse and organizational practice," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 231-242, June.
    10. Pernilla Gluch & Stina Månsson, 2021. "Taking Lead for Sustainability: Environmental Managers as Institutional Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Shi, Dan & Wang, Lei & Wang, Zhenxia, 2019. "What affects individual energy conservation behavior: Personal habits, external conditions or values? An empirical study based on a survey of college students," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 150-161.
    12. Chandratilake, S.R. & Dias, W.P.S., 2015. "Ratio based indicators and continuous score functions for better assessment of building sustainability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 137-143.
    13. Egmond, C. & R. Jonkers & Kok, G., 2006. "Target group segmentation makes sense: If one sheep leaps over the ditch, all the rest will follow," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(17), pages 3115-3123, November.
    14. Kamaruzzaman, Syahrul Nizam & Lou, Eric Choen Weng & Wong, Phui Fung & Edwards, Rodger & Hamzah, Noraini & Ghani, Mohd Khairolden, 2019. "Development of a non-domestic building refurbishment scheme for Malaysia: A Delphi approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 804-818.
    15. Egmond, C. & Jonkers, R. & Kok, G., 2006. "One size fits all? Policy instruments should fit the segments of target groups," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(18), pages 3464-3474, December.
    16. Focacci, Antonio, 2009. "Residential plants investment appraisal subsequent to the new supporting photovoltaic economic mechanism in Italy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2710-2715, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:4:y:2012:i:6:p:1188-1213:d:18238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.