IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p352-d1015110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promoting Sustainable and Resilient Constructive Patterns in Vulnerable Communities: Habitat for Humanity’s Sustainable Housing Prototypes in El Salvador

Author

Listed:
  • Rosa Ana Jiménez-Expósito

    (Department of Building Construction I, University of Seville, 41004 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Antonio Serrano-Jiménez

    (Department of Building Construction, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Pablo Fernández-Ans

    (Research Department, Rehabilita-Energía, 41011 Seville, Spain)

  • Gianluca Stasi

    (Research Department, CTRL+Z Arquitectura, 41003 Seville, Spain)

  • Carmen Díaz-López

    (Department of Building Construction I, University of Seville, 41004 Sevilla, Spain
    Department of Building Construction, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Ángela Barrios-Padura

    (Department of Building Construction I, University of Seville, 41004 Sevilla, Spain)

Abstract

The global challenges regarding sustainability and the guarantee of minimum habitability requirements have led to the transformation of construction practices, where research has failed to achieve sufficient dissemination and findings. The purpose of this research is to promote sustainable and resilient patterns in construction in vulnerable neighbourhoods in emerging countries by disseminating techniques and mechanisms through in situ transfer workshops and by raising awareness of the environmental importance of construction. Regarding materials and methods, this paper contributes innovative insights by combining training workshops and awareness-raising sessions to promote both environmental education and sustainable and optimised habits in construction. These methods are applied and tested in a real case study in El Salvador. Subsequent to carrying out a multi-disciplinary assessment analysis, the outcomes and results have led to the design of prototypes that have obtained a global EDGE certificate on sustainable construction and efficient use of resources once the users’ testimonies, weaknesses, and strengths have been addressed. The conclusions indicate that families, volunteers, and technical workers need to be trained by promoting environmental awareness in social housing and establishing a plan for dissemination to communicate across universities and public and private institutions in order to replicate guidelines across American dry-corridor countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosa Ana Jiménez-Expósito & Antonio Serrano-Jiménez & Pablo Fernández-Ans & Gianluca Stasi & Carmen Díaz-López & Ángela Barrios-Padura, 2022. "Promoting Sustainable and Resilient Constructive Patterns in Vulnerable Communities: Habitat for Humanity’s Sustainable Housing Prototypes in El Salvador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:352-:d:1015110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/352/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/352/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jordi Feu Gelis & Albert Torrent Font, 2021. "The Ideal Type of Innovative School That Promotes Sustainability: The Case of Rural Communities in Catalonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Kristina Mjörnell & Anna Boss & Markus Lindahl & Stefan Molnar, 2014. "A Tool to Evaluate Different Renovation Alternatives with Regard to Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Johanna Naukkarinen & Laura Jouhkimo, 2021. "Toward Integrated and Inclusive Education for Sustainability with School–University Cooperation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Mª Desirée Alba-Rodríguez & Carlos Rubio-Bellido & Mónica Tristancho-Carvajal & Raúl Castaño-Rosa & Madelyn Marrero, 2021. "Present and Future Energy Poverty, a Holistic Approach: A Case Study in Seville, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Liane Thuvander & Paula Femenías & Kristina Mjörnell & Pär Meiling, 2012. "Unveiling the Process of Sustainable Renovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Singh, Manoj Kumar & Mahapatra, Sadhan & Teller, Jacques, 2013. "An analysis on energy efficiency initiatives in the building stock of Liege, Belgium," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 729-741.
    7. Pilar Mercader-Moyano & Oswaldo Morat-Pérez & Carmen Muñoz-González, 2021. "Housing Evaluation Methodology in a Situation of Social Poverty to Guarantee Sustainable Cities: The Satisfaction Dimension for the Case of Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-48, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francisco Valderrey & Lina Carreño & Simone Lucatello & Emanuele Giorgi, 2023. "Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Vulnerabilities: Communities in Northern Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefan Olsson & Tove Malmqvist & Mauritz Glaumann, 2015. "Managing Sustainability Aspects in Renovation Processes: Interview Study and Outline of a Process Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Kristina Mjörnell & Jenny von Platten & Kicki Björklund, 2022. "Balancing Social and Economic Sustainability in Renovation with an Affordable Option for Tenants? A Pilot Study from Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Pilar Mercader-Moyano & Antonio Serrano-Jiménez, 2021. "Special Issue “Urban and Buildings Regeneration Strategy to Climatic Change Mitigation, Energy, and Social Poverty after a World Health and Economic Global Crisis”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-6, October.
    4. Linus Malmgren & Kristina Mjörnell, 2015. "Application of a Decision Support Tool in Three Renovation Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Hans Lind & Kerstin Annadotter & Folke Björk & Lovisa Högberg & Tord Af Klintberg, 2016. "Sustainable Renovation Strategy in the Swedish Million Homes Programme: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, April.
    6. Per Anker Jensen & Esmir Maslesa & Jakob Brinkø Berg, 2018. "Sustainable Building Renovation: Proposals for a Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Peep Pihelo & Kalle Kuusk & Targo Kalamees, 2020. "Development and Performance Assessment of Prefabricated Insulation Elements for Deep Energy Renovation of Apartment Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Kristina Mjörnell & Paula Femenías & Kerstin Annadotter, 2019. "Renovation Strategies for Multi-Residential Buildings from the Record Years in Sweden—Profit-Driven or Socioeconomically Responsible?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Bienvenido-Huertas, David & Moyano, Juan & Rodríguez-Jiménez, Carlos E. & Marín, David, 2019. "Applying an artificial neural network to assess thermal transmittance in walls by means of the thermometric method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 1-14.
    10. Jenny von Platten & Karl de Fine Licht & Mikael Mangold & Kristina Mjörnell, 2021. "Renovating on Unequal Premises: A Normative Framework for a Just Renovation Wave in Swedish Multifamily Housing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-32, September.
    11. Alaa Khadra & Mårten Hugosson & Jan Akander & Jonn Are Myhren, 2020. "Development of a Weight Factor Method for Sustainability Decisions in Building Renovation. Case Study Using Renobuild," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-15, September.
    12. Hermano Bernardo & Adélio Gaspar & Carlos Henggeler Antunes, 2018. "A Combined Value Focused Thinking-Soft Systems Methodology Approach to Structure Decision Support for Energy Performance Assessment of School Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Wang, Zhaohua & Liu, Qiang & Zhang, Bin, 2022. "What kinds of building energy-saving retrofit projects should be preferred? Efficiency evaluation with three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    14. Kosa Golić & Vesna Kosorić & Siu-Kit Lau, 2020. "A Framework for Early Stages of Socially Sustainable Renovation of Multifamily Buildings with Occupants’ Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    15. Åsa Wahlström & Björn Berggren & Josefin Florell & Rickard Nygren & Thomas Sundén, 2016. "Decision Making Process for Constructing Low-Energy Buildings in the Public Housing Sector in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-20, October.
    16. Davide Borelli & Francesco Devia & Ermanno Lo Cascio & Corrado Schenone & Alessandro Spoladore, 2016. "Combined Production and Conversion of Energy in an Urban Integrated System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Eglė Klumbytė & Raimondas Bliūdžius & Milena Medineckienė & Paris A. Fokaides, 2021. "An MCDM Model for Sustainable Decision-Making in Municipal Residential Buildings Facilities Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Aurora Greta Ruggeri & Laura Gabrielli & Massimiliano Scarpa, 2020. "Energy Retrofit in European Building Portfolios: A Review of Five Key Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-38, September.
    19. Lind, Hans & Annadotter, Kerstin & Björk, Folke & Högberg, Lovisa & af Klintberg, Tord, 2014. "Sustainable renovation strategy in the Swedish Million Homes Programme: A case study," Working Paper Series 14/2, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management & Banking and Finance.
    20. Säwén, Toivo & Sasic Kalagasidis, Angela & Hollberg, Alexander, 2024. "Critical perspectives on life cycle building performance assessment tool reviews," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:352-:d:1015110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.