IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p2839-d1618396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Marginal Abatement Costs of Carbon Emissions in the Logistics Industry and Its Influencing Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Yuping Wu

    (Research Center of Energy Economic, School of Business Administration, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

  • Bohui Du

    (Research Center of Energy Economic, School of Business Administration, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

  • Chuanyang Xu

    (Research Center of Energy Economic, School of Business Administration, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

  • Shibo Wei

    (Research Center of Energy Economic, School of Business Administration, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

  • Jinghua Yang

    (Research Center of Energy Economic, School of Business Administration, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

  • Yipeng Zhao

    (Research Center of Energy Economic, School of Business Administration, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

Abstract

While existing research has focused on logistics carbon emissions, understanding spatiotemporal emission cost dynamics and drivers remains limited. This study bridges three gaps through methodological advances: (1) Applying the Non-Radial Directional Distance Function (NDDF) to measure Marginal Carbon Abatement Costs (MCAC), overcoming traditional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model’s proportional adjustment constraints for provincial heterogeneity; (2) Pioneering dual-dimensional MCAC analysis integrating temporal trends (2013–2022) with spatial autocorrelation; and (3) Developing a spatial Durbin error model with time-fixed effects capturing direct/indirect impacts of innovation and infrastructure. Based on provincial data from 2013–2022, our findings demonstrate a U-shaped temporal trajectory of MCAC with the index fluctuating between 0.3483 and 0.4655, alongside significant spatial heterogeneity following an Eastern > Central > Northeastern > Western pattern. The identification of persistent high-high/low-low clusters through local Moran’s I analysis provides new evidence of spatial dependence in emission reduction costs, with these polarized clusters consistently comprising 70% of Chinese cities throughout the study period. Notably, the spatial econometric results reveal that foreign investment and logistics infrastructure exert competitive spillover effects, paradoxically increasing neighboring regions’ MCAC, a previously undocumented phenomenon in sustainability literature. These methodological advancements and empirical insights establish a novel framework for spatial cost allocation in emission reduction planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuping Wu & Bohui Du & Chuanyang Xu & Shibo Wei & Jinghua Yang & Yipeng Zhao, 2025. "Research on the Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Marginal Abatement Costs of Carbon Emissions in the Logistics Industry and Its Influencing Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2839-:d:1618396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2839/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2839/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhili Chen & Jinzhuo Wu, 2022. "Evolution of Logistics Industry Carbon Emissions in Heilongjiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Feifei Ye & Rongyan You & Haitian Lu & Sirui Han & Long-Hao Yang, 2023. "The Classification Impact of Different Types of Environmental Regulation on Chinese Provincial Carbon Emission Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Cristea, Anca & Hummels, David & Puzzello, Laura & Avetisyan, Misak, 2013. "Trade and the greenhouse gas emissions from international freight transport," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 153-173.
    4. Xinbao Tian & Meirong Zhang, 2019. "Research on Spatial Correlations and Influencing Factors of Logistics Industry Development Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Wu, Jianxin & Ma, Chunbo & Tang, Kai, 2019. "The static and dynamic heterogeneity and determinants of marginal abatement cost of CO2 emissions in Chinese cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 685-694.
    6. Yongrok Choi & Haohao Wang & Fan Yang & Hyoungsuk Lee, 2021. "Sustainable Governance of the Korean Freight Transportation Industry from an Environmental Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Dubie, Melaku & Kuo, Kai C. & Giron-Valderrama, Gabriela & Goodchild, Anne, 2020. "An evaluation of logistics sprawl in Chicago and Phoenix," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Choi, Yongrok & Zhang, Ning & Zhou, P., 2012. "Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: A slacks-based efficiency measure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 198-208.
    9. Vaninsky, Alexander, 2018. "Energy-environmental efficiency and optimal restructuring of the global economy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 338-348.
    10. Xie, Rui & Fang, Jiayu & Liu, Cenjie, 2017. "The effects of transportation infrastructure on urban carbon emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 199-207.
    11. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Wang, H., 2012. "Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: A non-radial directional distance function approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(3), pages 625-635.
    12. Xiao-Ni Huo & Wei-Wei Zhang & Dan-Feng Sun & Hong Li & Lian-Di Zhou & Bao-Guo Li, 2011. "Spatial Pattern Analysis of Heavy Metals in Beijing Agricultural Soils Based on Spatial Autocorrelation Statistics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Du, Limin & Hanley, Aoife & Wei, Chu, 2015. "Estimating the Marginal Abatement Cost Curve of CO2 Emissions in China: Provincial Panel Data Analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 217-229.
    2. Li, Jianglong & Lin, Boqiang, 2017. "Does energy and CO2 emissions performance of China benefit from regional integration?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 366-378.
    3. Xian, Yujiao & Hu, Zhihui & Wang, Ke, 2023. "The least-cost abatement measure of carbon emissions for China's glass manufacturing industry based on the marginal abatement costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    4. Jie Zhang & Zhencheng Xing & Jigan Wang, 2016. "Analysis of CO 2 Emission Performance and Abatement Potential for Municipal Industrial Sectors in Jiangsu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Hua Duan & Bin Li & Qi Wang, 2024. "Static High-Quality Development Efficiency and Its Dynamic Changes for China: A Non-Radial Directional Distance Function and a Metafrontier Non-Radial Malmquist Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Chen, Weidong & Geng, Wenxin, 2017. "Fossil energy saving and CO2 emissions reduction performance, and dynamic change in performance considering renewable energy input," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 283-292.
    7. Chen, Zhongfei & Barros, Carlos Pestana & Borges, Maria Rosa, 2015. "A Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis of Chinese fossil-fuel electricity generation companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 136-144.
    8. Duan, Na & Guo, Jun-Peng & Xie, Bai-Chen, 2016. "Is there a difference between the energy and CO2 emission performance for China’s thermal power industry? A bootstrapped directional distance function approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1552-1563.
    9. Yanni Yu & Yongrok Choi, 2015. "Measuring Environmental Performance Under Regional Heterogeneity in China: A Metafrontier Efficiency Analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 46(3), pages 375-388, October.
    10. Zhang, Ning & Kong, Fanbin & Choi, Yongrok, 2014. "Measuring sustainability performance for China: A sequential generalized directional distance function approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 392-397.
    11. Lee, Sang-choon & Oh, Dong-hyun & Lee, Jeong-dong, 2014. "A new approach to measuring shadow price: Reconciling engineering and economic perspectives," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 66-77.
    12. Wei, Chu & Löschel, Andreas & Liu, Bing, 2015. "Energy-saving and emission-abatement potential of Chinese coal-fired power enterprise: A non-parametric analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 33-43.
    13. Long, Xingle & Zhao, Xicang & Cheng, Faxin, 2015. "The comparison analysis of total factor productivity and eco-efficiency in China's cement manufactures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 61-66.
    14. Lin, Boqiang & Xu, Mengmeng, 2018. "Regional differences on CO2 emission efficiency in metallurgical industry of China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 302-311.
    15. Wei Wang & Hualin Xie & Tong Jiang & Daobei Zhang & Xue Xie, 2016. "Measuring the Total-Factor Carbon Emission Performance of Industrial Land Use in China Based on the Global Directional Distance Function and Non-Radial Luenberger Productivity Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Ying Li & Yung-Ho Chiu & Liang Chun Lu, 2018. "Regional Energy, CO 2 , and Economic and Air Quality Index Performances in China: A Meta-Frontier Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Long, Xingle & Wu, Chao & Zhang, Jijian & Zhang, Jing, 2018. "Environmental efficiency for 192 thermal power plants in the Yangtze River Delta considering heterogeneity: A metafrontier directional slacks-based measure approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3962-3971.
    18. Lin, Boqiang & Du, Kerui, 2015. "Modeling the dynamics of carbon emission performance in China: A parametric Malmquist index approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 550-557.
    19. Zhang, Ning & Choi, Yongrok, 2013. "A comparative study of dynamic changes in CO2 emission performance of fossil fuel power plants in China and Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 324-332.
    20. Yang, Jun & Cheng, Jixin & Zou, Ran & Geng, Zhifei, 2021. "Industrial SO2 technical efficiency, reduction potential and technology heterogeneities of China's prefecture-level cities: A multi-hierarchy meta-frontier parametric approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2839-:d:1618396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.