IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2437-d1609426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource Intensity in the Japanese Transportation System: Integration of Vehicle and Infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Naotaka Haraguchi

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, Noji-Higashi 1-1-1, Kusatsu-shi 525-8577, Shiga, Japan)

  • Shoki Kosai

    (Global Innovation Research Organization, Ritsumeikan University, Noji-Higashi 1-1-1, Kusatsu-shi 525-8577, Shiga, Japan)

  • Shunsuke Kashiwakura

    (Global Innovation Research Organization, Ritsumeikan University, Noji-Higashi 1-1-1, Kusatsu-shi 525-8577, Shiga, Japan)

  • Eiji Yamasue

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, Noji-Higashi 1-1-1, Kusatsu-shi 525-8577, Shiga, Japan)

  • Hiroki Tanikawa

    (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Aichi, Japan)

Abstract

An evaluation of resource efficiency by the transportation system is essential. Resource efficiency was examined from the perspective of mining activity in the form of resource intensity of transportation systems by combining transportation means and infrastructure. The framework of transport infrastructure was developed under a standardized classification to compare the entire transportation sector for various modes of transportation. This framework consists of links, support for links, nodes, fuel supply, and tanks for roadways, railways, aviation, and waterways. The developed framework was then applied to the Japanese transportation system, and resource efficiency in terms of passengers per vehicle was estimated by integrating means of transportation with associated infrastructure using the total material requirement as an indicator of mining intensity. It was identified that the transport infrastructure accounts for a high share of the resource intensity of passenger cars (15–30%) and railways (50–80%). Notably, even considering the massive mining demand for the development of transport infrastructure, the resource efficiency of railways is the highest among various transportation modes.

Suggested Citation

  • Naotaka Haraguchi & Shoki Kosai & Shunsuke Kashiwakura & Eiji Yamasue & Hiroki Tanikawa, 2025. "Resource Intensity in the Japanese Transportation System: Integration of Vehicle and Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2437-:d:1609426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2437/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2437/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bringezu, Stefan & Schutz, Helmut & Steger, Soren & Baudisch, Jan, 2004. "International comparison of resource use and its relation to economic growth: The development of total material requirement, direct material inputs and hidden flows and the structure of TMR," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1-2), pages 97-124, November.
    2. Lipscy, Phillip Y. & Schipper, Lee, 2013. "Energy efficiency in the Japanese transport sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 248-258.
    3. Shoki Kosai & Muku Yuasa & Eiji Yamasue, 2020. "Chronological Transition of Relationship between Intracity Lifecycle Transport Energy Efficiency and Population Density," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Elshkaki, Ayman, 2020. "Long-term analysis of critical materials in future vehicles electrification in China and their national and global implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Rafaj & Markus Amann, 2018. "Decomposing Air Pollutant Emissions in Asia: Determinants and Projections," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Hu, Xueyue & Wang, Chunying & Elshkaki, Ayman, 2024. "Material-energy Nexus: A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Niza, Samuel & Ferrão, Paulo, 2006. "A transitional economy's metabolism: The case of Portugal," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 265-280.
    4. Lange, Steffen & Pohl, Johanna & Santarius, Tilman, 2020. "Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Jean-Baptiste Bahers & Paula Higuera & Anne Ventura & Nicolas Antheaume, 2020. "The “Metal-Energy-Construction Mineral” Nexus in the Island Metabolism: The Case of the Extractive Economy of New Caledonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Shiraki, Hiroto & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi & Shigetomi, Yosuke & Ehara, Tomoki & Ochi, Yuki & Ogawa, Yuki, 2020. "Factors affecting CO2 emissions from private automobiles in Japan: The impact of vehicle occupancy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    7. Zhao, Feifei & Hu, Zheng & Yi, Ping & Zhao, Xu, 2024. "Does environmental decentralization improve industrial ecology? Evidence from China's Yangtze River Economic Belt," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1250-1270.
    8. Aleksandra Kuzior & Marek Staszek, 2021. "Energy Management in the Railway Industry: A Case Study of Rail Freight Carrier in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Wendler, Tobias & Töbelmann, Daniel & Günther, Jutta, 2021. "Natural resources and technology - on the mitigating effect of green tech," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242416, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    10. Sirkka Koskela & Tuomas Mattila & Riina Antikainen & Ilmo Mäenpää, 2013. "Identifying Key Sectors and Measures for a Transition towards a Low Resource Economy," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Julia K Steinberger & Fridolin Krausmann & Michael Getzner & Heinz Schandl & Jim West, 2013. "Development and Dematerialization: An International Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-11, October.
    12. Yoshida, Keisuke & Fishman, Tomer & Okuoka, Keijiro & Tanikawa, Hiroki, 2017. "Material stock's overburden: Automatic spatial detection and estimation of domestic extraction and hidden material flows," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 165-175.
    13. Jinhua Shao & Brayan Tillaguango & Rafael Alvarado & Santiago Ochoa-Moreno & Johanna Alvarado-Espejo, 2021. "Environmental Impact of the Shadow Economy, Globalisation, Trade and Market Size: Evidence Using Linear and Non-Linear Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Tobias Wendler, 2019. "About the Relationship Between Green Technology and Material Usage," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(3), pages 1383-1423, November.
    15. Halme, Minna & Anttonen, Markku & Kuisma, Mika & Kontoniemi, Nea & Heino, Erja, 2007. "Business models for material efficiency services: Conceptualization and application," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 126-137, June.
    16. Wei Yan & Changbiao Zhong, 2022. "The Coordination of Aquaculture Development with Environment and Resources: Based on Measurement of Provincial Eco-Efficiency in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, June.
    17. Wen, W. & Yang, S. & Zhou, P. & Gao, S.Z., 2021. "Impacts of COVID-19 on the electric vehicle industry: Evidence from China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    18. Yu, Zhen & Wang, Yilan & Ma, Xiaoqian & Shuai, Chuanmin & Zhao, Yujia, 2023. "How critical mineral supply security affects China NEVs industry? Based on a prediction for chromium and cobalt in 2030," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    19. Luca Ciacci & Fabrizio Passarini, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Environmental and Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-8, November.
    20. Konstantinos Mantalovas & Gaetano Di Mino & Ana Jimenez Del Barco Carrion & Elisabeth Keijzer & Björn Kalman & Tony Parry & Davide Lo Presti, 2020. "European National Road Authorities and Circular Economy: An Insight into Their Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2437-:d:1609426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.