IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2200-d1604557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Digital–Green Synergy on Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Dongfeng Chen

    (School of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Junpeng Wang

    (School of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Bin Li

    (School of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Huihui Luo

    (School of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Guangming Hou

    (School of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Driven by the dual imperatives of global economic green transformation and the advancement of digital technologies, achieving synergistic enhancement through digitalization and greenization to promote sustainable development has become a focal point for both academia and practical fields. This study, utilizing a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023, aims to explore the transformative potential of digital–green synergy (DGS) for enhancing enterprise sustainable development within the realm of production efficiency improvement. Employing a coupling coordination model based on the entropy-weighted TOPSIS method, the research measures the DGS levels of enterprises. Grounded in strategic synergy theory, the resource-based view, and dynamic capability theory, this study thoroughly investigates the direct impacts of DGS on corporate TFP, intermediary mechanisms, moderating effects, and heterogeneous roles. The research findings robustly demonstrate that DGS can significantly improve enterprise TFP through optimizing resource allocation, reducing cost stickiness, and enhancing operational efficiency, thereby facilitating the dynamic reorganization of production factors and the creation of sustainable value. Furthermore, external factors, such as financing constraints and environmental regulation, alongside internal organizational factors like executive characteristics, are shown to exert significant moderating effects on the effectiveness of DGS. In summary, this research not only highlights the crucial role of DGS in enhancing production efficiency as a driver for high-quality corporate development and the pursuit of sustainable goals but also provides important theoretical guidance for policymakers to incentivize digital and green transformation. It also offers practical insights for enterprise managers to strategically formulate synergistic development strategies, enhance economic benefits, and achieve long-term sustainable performance. Beyond these practical implications, this study further enriches the theoretical landscape by first extending strategic synergy theory to firm-level digital–green synergy in emerging markets; second by enhancing sustainability research by adopting a broader “environment-society” framework; methodologically innovating by developing a novel “goal-strategy-input-technology” synergy measurement framework; and finally, deepening the theoretical understanding of DGS-TFP relationships through mechanism and moderator exploration.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongfeng Chen & Junpeng Wang & Bin Li & Huihui Luo & Guangming Hou, 2025. "The Impact of Digital–Green Synergy on Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-40, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2200-:d:1604557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2200/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2200/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Linhui & Wang, Hui & Cao, Zhanglu & He, Yongda & Dong, Zhiqing & Wang, Shixiang, 2022. "Can industrial intellectualization reduce carbon emissions? — Empirical evidence from the perspective of carbon total factor productivity in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Magali A. Delmas & Michael W. Toffel, 2008. "Organizational responses to environmental demands: opening the black box," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(10), pages 1027-1055, October.
    3. Song, Malin & Peng, Licheng & Shang, Yuping & Zhao, Xin, 2022. "Green technology progress and total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises: A perspective of technical compensation of environmental regulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Chang-Tai Hsieh & Peter J. Klenow, 2009. "Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 124(4), pages 1403-1448.
    5. Bohnsack, René & Pinkse, Jonatan & Kolk, Ans, 2014. "Business models for sustainable technologies: Exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 284-300.
    6. Mabel D Costa & Ahsan Habib, 2023. "Cost stickiness and firm value," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 235-273, June.
    7. Hainmueller, Jens & Xu, Yiqing, 2013. "ebalance: A Stata Package for Entropy Balancing," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 54(i07).
    8. Yanan Liang & Cheng Zhang, 2024. "Digital transformation and total factor productivity of enterprises: evidence from China," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 1-22, February.
    9. Nan-Ting Kuo & Cheng-Few Lee, 2023. "Political Institutions and Cost Stickiness: International Evidence," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 745-778, May.
    10. Teece, David J., 2018. "Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1367-1387.
    11. Céline Péréa & Jessica Gérard & Julien de Benedittis, 2023. "Digital sobriety: From awareness of the negative impacts of IT usages to degrowth technology at work," Post-Print emse-04116949, HAL.
    12. Zhenjie Liu & Weian Li & Chen Hao & Huan Liu, 2021. "Corporate environmental performance and financing constraints: An empirical study in the Chinese context," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 616-629, March.
    13. Mark C. Anderson & Rajiv D. Banker & Surya N. Janakiraman, 2003. "Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs “Sticky”?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 47-63, March.
    14. Xiaomei Li & Huchuan Deng & Xuanrui Yu & Jiehong Li & Yang Yu, 2024. "Research on the Coordinated Development of Digital Economy, Green Technology Innovation, and Ecological Environment Quality—A Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-27, June.
    15. Lai, Xiaobing & Yue, Shujing & Guo, Chong & Gao, Peng, 2024. "Unleashing global potential: The impact of digital technology innovation on corporate international diversification," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    16. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    17. Stermieri, L. & Kober, T. & McKenna, R. & Schmidt, T.J. & Panos, E., 2024. "The role of digital social practices and technologies in the Swiss energy transition towards net-zero carbon dioxide emissions in 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    18. Wang, Pei & Xue, Weixian & Wang, Zhuan, 2024. "Fog and haze control and enterprise green total factor productivity - evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    19. Liu, Yang & Dong, Jiuyu & Mei, Liang & Shen, Rui, 2023. "Digital innovation and performance of manufacturing firms: An affordance perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Banker, Rajiv D. & Byzalov, Dmitri & Chen, Lei (Tony), 2013. "Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 111-127.
    21. Nambisan, Satish & Wright, Mike & Feldman, Maryann, 2019. "The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    22. Arundel, Anthony & Kabla, Isabelle, 1998. "What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 127-141, June.
    23. Hua Zhang & Qiwang Zhang, 2023. "How Does Digital Transformation Facilitate Enterprise Total Factor Productivity? The Multiple Mediators of Supplier Concentration and Customer Concentration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Mengzhe & Guo, Siyuan & Wang, Xizi & Liu, Yingqi, 2024. "Increase or decrease: Customer digital transformation and supplier cost stickiness," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Yuwen Cai & Nijat Hajikhanov & Thomas Kaspereit & Anke Müßig, 2024. "Local party committee and labor cost asymmetry," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 371-403, September.
    3. Jinqiu He & Huiwen Su, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Green Innovation of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure and International Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Rahul Kapoor & Thomas Klueter, 2021. "Unbundling and Managing Uncertainty Surrounding Emerging Technologies," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 62-74, March.
    5. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    6. Frank W. Geels & Jonatan Pinkse & Dimitri Zenghelis, 2021. "Productivity opportunities and risks in a transformative,low-carbon and digital age," Working Papers 009, The Productivity Institute.
    7. Guo, Xiaochuan & Li, Mengmeng & Wang, Yanlin & Mardani, Abbas, 2023. "Does digital transformation improve the firm’s performance? From the perspective of digitalization paradox and managerial myopia," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. Zahid Sarwar & Jingmei Gao & Adnan Khan, 2024. "Nexus of digital platforms, innovation capability, and strategic alignment to enhance innovation performance in the Asia Pacific region: a dynamic capability perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 867-901, June.
    9. Silva, Lucas Emmanuel Nascimento & Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Faria, Aline Mariane de & Borini, Felipe Mendes, 2024. "Innovation processes in ecosystem settings: An integrative framework and future directions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    10. Jeehan Awad & Rodrigo Martín‐Rojas, 2024. "Enhancing social responsibility and resilience through entrepreneurship and digital environment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1688-1704, May.
    11. Liao, Zhongju & Chen, Jie & Chen, Xueli & Song, Malin, 2024. "Digital platform capability, environmental innovation quality, and firms’ competitive advantage: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    12. Xiao, Zheng & Niu, Qingqing & Yun, Feng & Ye, Yongwei, 2024. "The impact of state-owned capital on labor cost stickiness in private firms: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Carrasco-Farré, Carlos & Snihur, Yuliya & Berrone, Pascual & Ricart, Joan Enric, 2022. "The stakeholder value proposition of digital platforms in an urban ecosystem," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    14. Terje Berg & Emil Gustafsson & Ranik Raaen Wahlstrøm, 2024. "Cost management and working capital management: ebony and ivory in perfect harmony?," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 207-233, June.
    15. Thomas Guenther & Anja Riehl & Richard Rößler, 2014. "Cost stickiness: state of the art of research and implications," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 301-318, February.
    16. Muhammad Farooq Islam & Ozge Can, 2024. "Integrating digital and sustainable entrepreneurship through business models: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Jin, Laiqun & Dai, Jiaying & Jiang, Weijie & Cao, Kairui, 2023. "Digital finance and misallocation of resources among firms: Evidence from China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    18. Jean-Michel Sahut & Luca Iandoli & Frédéric Teulon, 2021. "The age of digital entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1159-1169, February.
    19. Chenglei Xu & Shuxin Zhu & Boru Yang & Bin Miao & Yi Duan, 2023. "A Review of Policy Framework Research on Promoting Sustainable Transformation of Digital Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    20. Wulung Li & Ramachandran Natarajan & Yan Zhao & Kenneth Zheng, 2021. "The effect of management control mechanisms through risk-taking incentives on asymmetric cost behavior," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 219-243, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2200-:d:1604557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.