IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2128-d1603239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Regulatory Pressures and Stakeholder Expectations Drive CSR Adherence in the Chemical Industry?

Author

Listed:
  • Khalid Mujahid Alharbi

    (Department of Accounting, College of Business Administration in Yanbu, Taibah University, Madinah 41477, Saudi Arabia)

  • Amina Elshamly

    (Department of Management, College of Business Administration in Yanbu, Taibah University, Madinah 41477, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ibrahim G. Mahgoub

    (Department of Management, College of Business Administration in Yanbu, Taibah University, Madinah 41477, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Business Administration Department, Faculty of Commerce, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt)

Abstract

The chemical industry plays a pivotal role in the health of the world’s economies despite facing significant criticism for its contribution to environmental degradation, particularly in pollution management and sustainable development. This paper investigates the key factors motivating executives in chemical companies to engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR), including regulatory pressure, profit maximization, stakeholder demands, and environmental concerns. Data were collected through a cross-sectional survey of over 400 executives worldwide, and structural equation modelling (SEM) was employed to test four hypotheses examining the relationships among various variables. The findings indicate that regulatory pressure positively influences CSR adoption, although a profit-maximization orientation negatively moderates this relationship. This suggests that companies with an excessive focus on profits are less likely to engage in meaningful CSR activities beyond mere compliance. Additionally, unmet stakeholder needs drive environmental commitment, highlighting that managers and executives are responsive to the environmental expectations of consumers, society, and investors. In turn, environmental commitment strongly correlates with implementing pollution-prevention mechanisms, emphasizing the role of intrinsic motivations in promoting authentic CSR practices. This research expands on prior studies of CSR in high-impact industries by proposing a more integrated theoretical framework, drawing from Institutional Theory, Stakeholder Theory, and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Practical implications underscore the value of incentives that encourage firms to make substantial CSR commitments without jeopardizing profitability. Limitations of the study include its cross-sectional design, which calls for longitudinal research to understand causation better. Future studies could also explore additional industries to produce findings applicable across various sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Khalid Mujahid Alharbi & Amina Elshamly & Ibrahim G. Mahgoub, 2025. "Do Regulatory Pressures and Stakeholder Expectations Drive CSR Adherence in the Chemical Industry?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2128-:d:1603239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2128/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2128/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam S. Markowski & Andrzej Krasławski & Tomaso Vairo & Bruno Fabiano, 2021. "Process Safety Management Quality in Industrial Corporation for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Rodrigo A. Britto & Thomas M. Corsi & Curtis M. Grimm, 2010. "The Relationship between Motor Carrier Financial Performance and Safety Performance," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(4), pages 42-51, September.
    3. Magali A. Delmas & Michael W. Toffel, 2008. "Organizational responses to environmental demands: opening the black box," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(10), pages 1027-1055, October.
    4. Henrique Formigoni & Liliane Segura & Isabel Gallego-Álvarez, 2020. "Board of directors characteristics and disclosure practices of corporate social responsibility: a comparative study between Brazilian and Spanish companies," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(2), pages 282-298, March.
    5. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    6. Bueno, Nicolas, 2017. "Corporate liability for violations of the human right to just conditions of work in extraterritorial operations," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 75781, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Muhammad Adnan & Baohua Xiao & Shaheen Bibi & Peiwen Xiao & Peng Zhao & Haiyan Wang & Muhammad Ubaid Ali & Xianjin An, 2024. "Known and Unknown Environmental Impacts Related to Climate Changes in Pakistan: An Under-Recognized Risk to Local Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-27, July.
    8. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    9. Caroline Flammer & Jiao Luo, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility as an employee governance tool: Evidence from a quasi-experiment," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 163-183, February.
    10. Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis & Gijsbert Korevaar, 2019. "Social Life Cycle Assessment of Brine Treatment in the Process Industry: A Consequential Approach Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Yijing Wang & Guido Berens, 2015. "The Impact of Four Types of Corporate Social Performance on Reputation and Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 337-359, October.
    12. Brahim Gaies, 2022. "Reassessing the impact of health expenditure on income growth in the face of the global sanitary crisis: the case of developing countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(9), pages 1415-1436, December.
    13. Thomas P. Lyon & John W. Maxwell, 2011. "Greenwash: Corporate Environmental Disclosure under Threat of Audit," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 3-41, March.
    14. Edward Freeman, R. & Phillips, Robert A., 2002. "Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 331-349, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frederik Dahlmann & Layla Branicki & Stephen Brammer, 2019. "Managing Carbon Aspirations: The Influence of Corporate Climate Change Targets on Environmental Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Jiao Luo & Aseem Kaul, 2019. "Private action in public interest: The comparative governance of social issues," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 476-502, April.
    3. Dayuan Li & Jialin Jiang & Lu Zhang & Chen Huang & Ding Wang, 2023. "Do CEOs with Sent-Down Movement Experience Foster Corporate Environmental Responsibility?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 147-168, June.
    4. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    5. Lu Zhang & Yuan George Shan & Millicent Chang, 2021. "Can CSR Disclosure Protect Firm Reputation During Financial Restatements?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 157-184, September.
    6. Yanqi Han & Hui Lyu & Shixiong Cheng & Yuhang He, 2022. "Influencing Mechanism and Difference of Poultry Farmers’ Willingness and Behavior in Breeding Scale—Evidence from Jianghan Plain, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Christopher Marquis & Cuili Qian, 2014. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: Symbol or Substance?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 127-148, February.
    8. Francesco Gangi & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele & Nicola Varrone, 2021. "Assessing the impact of socially responsible human resources management on company environmental performance and cost of debt," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1511-1527, September.
    9. James J. Cordeiro & Giorgia Profumo & Ilaria Tutore, 2021. "Family ownership and stockholder reactions to environmental performance disclosure: A test of secondary agency relationships," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2091-2107, May.
    10. Liwei Shan & Shihe Fu & Lu Zheng, 2017. "Corporate sexual equality and firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(9), pages 1812-1826, September.
    11. Amondarain, Josune & Aldazabal, M. Edurne & Espinosa-Pike, Marcela, 2023. "Gender differences in the auditing stereotype and their influence on the intention to enter the profession," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    12. Ilya Okhmatovskiy, 2017. "Self-regulation of corporate governance in Russian firms: translating the national standard into internal policies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(2), pages 499-532, June.
    13. Zach Raff & Dietrich Earnhart, 2020. "The effect of environmental enforcement on labor: environmental workers and production workers," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 118-133, April.
    14. Erfan Rezvani & Christian Rojas, 2022. "Firm responsiveness to consumers' reviews: The effect on online reputation," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 898-922, November.
    15. Walid Ben‐Amar & Breeda Comyns & Isabelle Martinez, 2024. "Firm commitments on climate change: Effects of science‐based targets on financial outcomes during the COVID‐19 crisis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 7768-7787, December.
    16. Marco Caliendo & Frank Fossen & Alexander Kritikos, 2014. "Personality characteristics and the decisions to become and stay self-employed," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 787-814, April.
    17. Tomás Ruiz & Rosa Arroyo & Lidón Mars & Daniel Casquero, 2018. "Effects of a Travel Behaviour Change Program on Sustainable Travel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Catherine Liston-Heyes & Diego Alfonso Vazquez Brust, 2016. "Environmental Protection in Environmentally Reactive Firms: Lessons from Corporate Argentina," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 361-379, May.
    19. Kotiranta, Annu & Puumalainen, Kaisu & Sjögren, Helena & Dana, Léo-Paul, 2024. "Digitalization as a growth driver for social enterprises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    20. Francesco Gangi & Lucia Michela Daniele & Nicola Varrone, 2020. "How do corporate environmental policy and corporate reputation affect risk‐adjusted financial performance?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1975-1991, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2128-:d:1603239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.