Author
Listed:
- Adam S. Markowski
(Department of Safety Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland)
- Andrzej Krasławski
(Department of Safety Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Lappeenranta-Lahti LUT University of Technology, 15101 Lahti, Finland)
- Tomaso Vairo
(Civil, Chemical and Environmental Department (DICCA), Polytechnic School of Genoa University, 16126 Genoa, Italy)
- Bruno Fabiano
(Civil, Chemical and Environmental Department (DICCA), Polytechnic School of Genoa University, 16126 Genoa, Italy)
Abstract
In recent years, also in connection with Covid-19 pandemics and enforced restrictions, there has been the formation of large industrial corporations gathering separate companies with similar, sometimes complementary production profiles. This evolving trend has brought usually positive economic effects; however, it has also created some integration problems that include the process safety management. The Texas City BP accident in 2005 and its tremendous human and economic losses underlined the obstacles in defining a well-structured corporation process safety management. The main causes of the above-mentioned accident were connected to an inadequate safety culture at the managerial level. Strong leadership and high standards of corporate governance are required to inspire correct safety behavior in the staff. The so-called soft skills become even more important in the Industry 4.0 arena, where the foundation of the whole system is based on an intelligent use and interpretation of data. The importance of this aspect is confirmed by several post-accidental analyses of past events. Although some research on this topic has been already done, it is worth it to dedicate some effort to identifying specific factors which influence the corporate process safety management quality, and, once identified, to assess them. This paper applies the concept of “lessons learnt” for the identification of organizational and managerial aspects worth consideration in process safety management. Based on accident and literature reviews and expert opinions, the aim is to identify the major contributing factors among leadership and safety culture, risk awareness, knowledge and competence, communication, and information and decision-making processes. To self-assess the level of commitment of the top leaders in process safety management, a checklist approach is proposed, combined with a quantitative, weighted evaluation based on the Relative Efficiency Indicator (REI). Positive value of REI may ensure the effectiveness of process safety management in major hazard industries and their appropriate adaptation to the corporation community. The proposed method, which is validated in an actual case study, underlines the importance of an appropriate education, and of a more careful selection of HSE managers.
Suggested Citation
Adam S. Markowski & Andrzej Krasławski & Tomaso Vairo & Bruno Fabiano, 2021.
"Process Safety Management Quality in Industrial Corporation for Sustainable Development,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9001-:d:612768
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9001-:d:612768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.