IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1925-d1598663.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Technical Efficiency and Resilience of Rwandan Smallholder Farmers Participating in Small-Scale Irrigation Schemes

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel Olatunbosun Benjamin

    (Professorship for Development Economics and Policy, RISK Research Center, Universität der Bundeswehr München (UniBw M), 85577 Neubiberg, Germany)

  • Alexander Lotz

    (Governance in International Agribusiness, TUM School of Management, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 85354 Freising, Germany)

  • Oreoluwa Ola

    (Professorship for Development Economics and Policy, RISK Research Center, Universität der Bundeswehr München (UniBw M), 85577 Neubiberg, Germany)

  • Gertrud Rosa Buchenrieder

    (Professorship for Development Economics and Policy, RISK Research Center, Universität der Bundeswehr München (UniBw M), 85577 Neubiberg, Germany)

Abstract

In a number of developing countries, low productivity and technical inefficiency, with climate change looming in the background, remain a severe challenge for the agricultural sector, especially smallholder farmers. To enhance smallholder farmers’ livelihoods in terms of agricultural productivity while mitigating the adverse effects of climate change, improving technical efficiency in a sustainable manner is a promising option. One possible alternative is the use of solar-powered small-scale irrigation systems in areas vulnerable to climate change to ensure sufficient access to water. This study uses stochastic frontier analysis to analyze technical efficiency and its determinants among smallholder farmers who benefit from a solar-powered small-scale irrigation scheme in Gitaraga, Bugesera District, Rwanda. Similar smallholders from a neighboring village, who were not participating in the irrigation scheme, represent the control group. The results suggest that inputs such as land, water, and labor are positively correlated to agricultural productivity. Farmers participating in the irrigation scheme are 31.2 percentage points more technically efficient compared to non-participants, despite similar climatic conditions. Thus, relaxing the water constraint on arable land will increase agricultural productivity. Explanatory inefficiency determinants include years of farming experience and market access. Subsequently, policy makers should continue to support programs that improve smallholder access to sustainable irrigation schemes, other infrastructure, extension services, and upstream value chains, as well as markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel Olatunbosun Benjamin & Alexander Lotz & Oreoluwa Ola & Gertrud Rosa Buchenrieder, 2025. "Assessing the Technical Efficiency and Resilience of Rwandan Smallholder Farmers Participating in Small-Scale Irrigation Schemes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1925-:d:1598663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1925/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1925/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kelemework, D., 2008. "A comparative analysis of the technical efficiency of irrigated and rainfed agriculture: a case of Awash and Rift valleys of Ethiopia," Conference Papers h044137, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Qian Guo & Oreoluwa Ola & Emmanuel O. Benjamin, 2020. "Determinants of the Adoption of Sustainable Intensification in Southern African Farming Systems: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Muzungu Paul, Gatemberezi, 2011. "Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Irish Potato Production in Nyabihu District, Rwanda," Research Theses 243460, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    4. Oreoluwa Ola & Luisa Menapace, 2020. "Revisiting constraints to smallholder participation in high‐value markets: A best‐worst scaling approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(4), pages 595-608, July.
    5. Fried, Harold O. & Lovell, C. A. Knox & Schmidt, Shelton S. (ed.), 2008. "The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195183528, Decembrie.
    6. Reifschneider, David & Stevenson, Rodney, 1991. "Systematic Departures from the Frontier: A Framework for the Analysis of Firm Inefficiency," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 32(3), pages 715-723, August.
    7. Ngango, Jules & Hong, Seungjee, 2021. "Impacts of land tenure security on yield and technical efficiency of maize farmers in Rwanda," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    8. Veronique Theriault & Renata Serra, 2014. "Institutional Environment and Technical Efficiency: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Cotton Producers in West Africa," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(2), pages 383-405, June.
    9. Elizaphan J. O. Rao & Bernhard Brümmer & Matin Qaim, 2012. "Farmer Participation in Supermarket Channels, Production Technology, and Efficiency: The Case of Vegetables in Kenya," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 94(4), pages 891-912.
    10. Giel Ton & Sam Desiere & Wytse Vellema & Sophia Weituschat & Marijke D'Haese, 2017. "The effectiveness of contract farming for raising income of smallholder farmers in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 1-131.
    11. Kumbhakar,Subal C. & Wang,Hung-Jen & Horncastle,Alan P., 2015. "A Practitioner's Guide to Stochastic Frontier Analysis Using Stata," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107029514, January.
    12. Jacob Asravor & Alexander N. Wiredu & Khalid Siddig & Edward E. Onumah, 2019. "Evaluating the Environmental-Technology Gaps of Rice Farms in Distinct Agro-Ecological Zones of Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Zainab Oyetunde-Usman & Kehinde Oluseyi Olagunju, 2019. "Determinants of Food Security and Technical Efficiency among Agricultural Households in Nigeria," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-13, October.
    14. Emmanuel Olatunbosun Benjamin, 2020. "Smallholder Agricultural Investment and Productivity under Contract Farming and Customary Tenure System: A Malawian Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tong, Q. & Swallow, B. & Zhang, L. & Zhang, J., 2018. "Risk Attitude, Technical Efficiency and Adoption: An Integrated Approach to Climate-Smart Rice Production in the Jianghan Plain, China," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277311, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Tateishi, Henrique Ryosuke & Bragagnolo, Cassiano & de Faria, Rosane Nunes, 2020. "Economic and environmental efficiencies of greenhouse gases’ emissions under institutional influence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Subal C. Kumbhakar & Christopher F. Parmeter & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2022. "Stochastic Frontier Analysis: Foundations and Advances I," Springer Books, in: Subhash C. Ray & Robert G. Chambers & Subal C. Kumbhakar (ed.), Handbook of Production Economics, chapter 8, pages 331-370, Springer.
    4. Margarita Genius & Spiro Stefanou & Vangelis Tzouvelekas, 2009. "Productivity Growth and Efficiency under Leontief Technology: An Application to US Steam-Electric Power Generation Utilities," Working Papers 0913, University of Crete, Department of Economics.
    5. Deng, Yaguo, 2016. "Efficiency evaluation of Spanish hotel chains," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 23897, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    6. Muktar Geleto & Mohammed Essa, 2022. "Analysis of Red Pepper Production Risk Adjusted Technical Efficiency: The Case Of Lanfuro District In Siltie Zone, Southern Ethiopia," International Journal of Business and Management, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 10(1), pages 30-58, May.
    7. Genius, Margarita & Stefanou, Spiro E. & Tzouvelekas, Vangelis, 2012. "Measuring productivity growth under factor non-substitution: An application to US steam-electric power generation utilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 844-852.
    8. Rita, Rui & Marques, Vitor & Bárbara, Diogo & Chaves, Inês & Macedo, Pedro & Moutinho, Victor & Pereira, Mariana, 2023. "Crossing non-parametric and parametric techniques for measuring the efficiency: Evidence from 65 European electricity Distribution System Operators," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    9. Emilio Aguirre & Federico García-Suárez & Gabriela Sicilia, 2021. "Eficiencia técnica en la ganadería de carne bovina pastoril. Medición y exploración de sus determinantes en Uruguay," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 1321, Department of Economics - dECON.
    10. Kamiche Zegarra, J. & Bravo-Ureta, B., 2018. "Are users of market information efficient? A stochastic production frontier model corrected by sample selection," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275870, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Chen, Jiandong & Wu, Yinyin & Song, Malin & Zhu, Zunhong, 2017. "Stochastic frontier analysis of productive efficiency in China's Forestry Industry," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 87-95.
    12. Mark Andor & Christopher Parmeter, 2017. "Pseudolikelihood estimation of the stochastic frontier model," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(55), pages 5651-5661, November.
    13. Witte, Kristof De & Geys, Benny, 2011. "Evaluating efficient public good provision: Theory and evidence from a generalised conditional efficiency model for public libraries," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 319-327, May.
    14. Radha R. Ashrit, 2023. "Estimation of technical efficiency of Indian farms for major crops during 2013–2014 and 2017–2018: a stochastic Frontier production approach," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-32, February.
    15. Di Foggia, Giacomo & Beccarello, Massimo, 2018. "Improving efficiency in the MSW collection and disposal service combining price cap and yardstick regulation: The Italian case," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 79, pages 223-231.
    16. Orea, Luis, 2019. "The Econometric Measurement of Firms’ Efficiency," Efficiency Series Papers 2019/02, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    17. Orea, Luis, 2018. "Infrastructure, resource allocation and productivity growth: a mutually consistent decomposition of inter and intra-industry productivity effects," Efficiency Series Papers 2018/05, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    18. Gralka, Sabine, 2018. "Stochastic frontier analysis in higher education: A systematic review," CEPIE Working Papers 05/18, Technische Universität Dresden, Center of Public and International Economics (CEPIE).
    19. Muange, Elijah N. & Godecke, Theda & Schwarze, Stefan, 2015. "Effects of social networks on technical efficiency in smallholder agriculture: The case of cereal producers Tanzania," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 230221, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Tothmihaly, Andras & Ingram, Verina & von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan, 2019. "How Can the Environmental Efficiency of Indonesian Cocoa Farms Be Increased?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 134-145.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1925-:d:1598663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.