IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1685-d1593683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data Transfer Reliability from Building Information Modeling (BIM) to Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)—A Comparative Case Study of an Industrial Warehouse

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Francisco Fernández Rodríguez

    (Departamento de Ingeniería del Diseño, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Sevilla, 41011 Seville, Spain)

  • Alberto Picardo

    (Departamento de Ingeniería del Diseño, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Sevilla, 41011 Seville, Spain)

  • Teresa Aguilar-Planet

    (Departamento de Ingeniería del Diseño, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Sevilla, 41011 Seville, Spain)

  • Amanda Martín-Mariscal

    (Departamento de Ingeniería del Diseño, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Sevilla, 41011 Seville, Spain)

  • Estela Peralta

    (Departamento de Ingeniería del Diseño, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Sevilla, 41011 Seville, Spain)

Abstract

The automation of environmental assessment processes aimed at reducing the ecological footprint of industrial facilities, buildings, and infrastructure is one of the main challenges currently faced by the construction sector. In this context, Building Information Modeling (BIM) is a comprehensive methodology that enables the creation of digital models, facilitating the analysis of environmental performance throughout the life cycle of built assets. In addition to the capabilities offered by BIM, specialized tools for environmental impact analysis implement the standardized life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. However, one of the current limitations is the integration of BIM models and LCA tools. Few software solutions enable automated data transfer, complicating the environmental assessment process. The objective of this study is to evaluate the reliability of data transfer from BIM models to LCA tools, using an industrial warehouse as a case study. The research compares two LCA tools: Athena Impact Estimator, specialized in the construction sector, and SimaPro, a professional tool with advanced capabilities. This study is structured in two phases: (i) the development of a BIM model in Revit, including the definition of structural and functional components and the export of data to LCA tools, and (ii) the execution of the life cycle assessment in compliance with ISO 14040 and EN 15804 standards. The results show methodological and interoperability differences between the two tools, highlighting their strengths and limitations in terms of the precision of the results, resource consumption, training and expertise requirements, scope of environmental impact calculations, and adaptability to the construction sector in the integration of an LCA with a BIM model.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Francisco Fernández Rodríguez & Alberto Picardo & Teresa Aguilar-Planet & Amanda Martín-Mariscal & Estela Peralta, 2025. "Data Transfer Reliability from Building Information Modeling (BIM) to Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)—A Comparative Case Study of an Industrial Warehouse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1685-:d:1593683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1685/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1685/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francisco Javier Montiel-Santiago & Manuel Jesús Hermoso-Orzáez & Julio Terrados-Cepeda, 2020. "Sustainability and Energy Efficiency: BIM 6D. Study of the BIM Methodology Applied to Hospital Buildings. Value of Interior Lighting and Daylight in Energy Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Zhen Liu & Ziyuan Chi & Mohamed Osmani & Peter Demian, 2021. "Blockchain and Building Information Management (BIM) for Sustainable Building Development within the Context of Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Mayara S. Siverio Lima & Susana Duarte & Hans Exenberger & Georg Fröch & Matthias Flora, 2024. "Integrating BIM-LCA to Enhance Sustainability Assessments of Constructions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Zhonghao Chen & Lin Chen & Xingyang Zhou & Lepeng Huang & Malindu Sandanayake & Pow-Seng Yap, 2024. "Recent Technological Advancements in BIM and LCA Integration for Sustainable Construction: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-30, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Francisco Fernández Rodríguez, 2023. "Sustainable Design Protocol in BIM Environments: Case Study of 3D Virtual Models of a Building in Seville (Spain) Based on BREEAM Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-29, March.
    2. Yali Chen & Dan Huang & Zhen Liu & Mohamed Osmani & Peter Demian, 2022. "Construction 4.0, Industry 4.0, and Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Sustainable Building Development within the Smart City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-37, August.
    3. Maria Conceição da Costa Silva & Alyx Diêgo Oliveira Silva & Emilia Rahnemay Kohlman Rabbani & Luciana H. Alencar & George da Mota Passos Neto & João Pedro Couto & Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez, 2022. "Guidelines for the Implementation of BIM for Post-Occupancy Management of Social Housing in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Jun Geng & Yi Huang & Xiang Li & Yun Zhang, 2023. "Overcoming Barriers to the Adoption of Recycled Construction Materials: A Comprehensive PEST Analysis and Tailored Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Maria Psillaki & Nikolaos Apostolopoulos & Ilias Makris & Panagiotis Liargovas & Sotiris Apostolopoulos & Panos Dimitrakopoulos & George Sklias, 2023. "Hospitals’ Energy Efficiency in the Perspective of Saving Resources and Providing Quality Services through Technological Options: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Habib Sadri & Ibrahim Yitmen & Lavinia Chiara Tagliabue & Florian Westphal & Algan Tezel & Afshin Taheri & Goran Sibenik, 2023. "Integration of Blockchain and Digital Twins in the Smart Built Environment Adopting Disruptive Technologies—A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-46, February.
    7. Ravijanya Chippagiri & Ana Bras & Deepak Sharma & Rahul V. Ralegaonkar, 2022. "Technological and Sustainable Perception on the Advancements of Prefabrication in Construction Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Shuvo Dip Datta & Bassam A. Tayeh & Ibrahim Y. Hakeem & Yazan I. Abu Aisheh, 2023. "Benefits and Barriers of Implementing Building Information Modeling Techniques for Sustainable Practices in the Construction Industry—A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.
    9. Ahmad Morshedi & Navid Nezafati & Sajjad Shokouhyar, 2024. "Motivational Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing in Steel Industry Supply Chain: A Mixed Qualitative-Quantitative Method Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6273-6311, June.
    10. Armin Razmjoo & Meysam Majidi Nezhad & Lisa Gakenia Kaigutha & Mousa Marzband & Seyedali Mirjalili & Mehdi Pazhoohesh & Saim Memon & Mehdi A. Ehyaei & Giuseppe Piras, 2021. "Investigating Smart City Development Based on Green Buildings, Electrical Vehicles and Feasible Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Yu Cao & Liyan Huang & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman, 2022. "Building Information Modelling (BIM) Capabilities in the Design and Planning of Rural Settlements in China: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-34, October.
    12. Aleksandra Radziejowska & Bartosz Sobotka, 2021. "Analysis of the Social Aspect of Smart Cities Development for the Example of Smart Sustainable Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Wang, Guimei & Mukhtar, Azfarizal & Moayedi, Hossein & Khalilpoor, Nima & Tt, Quynh, 2024. "Application and evaluation of the evolutionary algorithms combined with conventional neural network to determine the building energy consumption of the residential sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    14. Carlo Iapige De Gaetani & Andrea Macchi & Pasquale Perri, 2020. "Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Yong Yang & Xiaogang Yue & Yongle Luo & Li Jin & Buyu Jia, 2024. "Building Information Modeling–Life Cycle Assessment: A Novel Technology for Rapid Calculation and Analysis System for Life Cycle Carbon Emissions of Bridges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-23, December.
    16. Yufen Zhang & Hongfan Bu & Shengxi Cao & Xiongfei Zhao, 2021. "Performance-Based Design of a Main Exhibition Hall and Its Ecological Connectivity with Surroundings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Ruwini Edirisinghe & Zelinna Pablo & Chimay Anumba & Saratu Tereno, 2021. "An Actor–Network Approach to Developing a Life Cycle BIM Maturity Model (LCBMM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, November.
    18. Chao Gao & Feng Wang & Xiaobing Hu & James Martinez, 2023. "Research on Sustainable Design of Smart Cities Based on the Internet of Things and Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Chro Hama Radha, 2023. "Retrofitting for Improving Indoor Air Quality and Energy Efficiency in the Hospital Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Xun Liu & Zhenhan Ding & Xiaobo Li & Zhiyuan Xue, 2023. "Research Progress, Hotspots, and Trends of Using BIM to Reduce Building Energy Consumption: Visual Analysis Based on WOS Database," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1685-:d:1593683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.