IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1684-d1593624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does ESG Performance Matter for Corporate Sustainability Performance? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Wenyu Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)

  • Zeyi Wei

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)

  • Linyun Ge

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)

  • Ya Zhang

    (Joint Research Institute, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 211815, China)

  • Guanghua Xu

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)

Abstract

Using 2010–2021 listed A-share companies as the research sample, we explore the influence of corporate ESG performance on sustainable development performance and the mechanism by which this influence occurs. The results indicate that ESG performance effectively enhances sustainable development performance. Mechanism analyses reveal that ESG performance promotes sustainable development performance through the “reputation effect” and “supervision effect”. Further analyses reveal that among the three dimensions of ESG, the social governance dimension (“S”) plays the most significant role. When environmental regulations are more stringent, green credit guidelines are stronger, internal controls are more effective, and the firm is in a growth or decline phase in its life cycle, the enhancing effect of ESG performance on sustainable development performance becomes more pronounced. Additionally, ESG performance can further enhance a company’s ability to obtain commercial credit and its overall performance. This paper enriches related research on the value effect of ESG and provides insights for listed companies, participants in the capital market, and government departments to emphasize ESG performance and improve ESG incentive policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenyu Zhang & Zeyi Wei & Linyun Ge & Ya Zhang & Guanghua Xu, 2025. "How Does ESG Performance Matter for Corporate Sustainability Performance? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-33, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1684-:d:1593624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1684/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1684/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dongyi Zhou & Rui Zhou, 2021. "ESG Performance and Stock Price Volatility in Public Health Crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Wu, Meng-Wen & Shen, Chung-Hua, 2013. "Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 3529-3547.
    3. Lee, Michael T. & Raschke, Robyn L. & Krishen, Anjala S., 2022. "Signaling green! firm ESG signals in an interconnected environment that promote brand valuation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-11.
    4. Stephen Brammer & Stephen Pavelin, 2006. "Voluntary Environmental Disclosures by Large UK Companies," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7-8), pages 1168-1188.
    5. Stephen Brammer & Stephen Pavelin, 2006. "Voluntary Environmental Disclosures by Large UK Companies," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7‐8), pages 1168-1188, September.
    6. Stephen J. Brammer & Stephen Pavelin, 2006. "Corporate Reputation and Social Performance: The Importance of Fit," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 435-455, May.
    7. Aerts, Walter & Cormier, Denis & Magnan, Michel, 2008. "Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets and the media: An international perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 643-659, January.
    8. Nie, Song & Liu, Junxian & Zeng, Gang & You, Jiyuan, 2023. "Local government debt pressure and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PB).
    9. Jaryn Bradford & Evan D. G. Fraser, 2008. "Local authorities, climate change and small and medium enterprises: identifying effective policy instruments to reduce energy use and carbon emissions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 156-172, May.
    10. Fare, Rolf & Shawna Grosskopf & Mary Norris & Zhongyang Zhang, 1994. "Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(1), pages 66-83, March.
    11. Han Long & Gen‐Fu Feng & Qiang Gong & Chun‐Ping Chang, 2023. "ESG performance and green innovation: An investigation based on quantile regression," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 5102-5118, November.
    12. Robert M. Grant & Charles Baden‐Fuller, 2004. "A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 61-84, January.
    13. Gratton, Lynda & Ghoshal, Sumantra, 2003. "Managing Personal Human Capital:: New Ethos for the 'Volunteer' Employee," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 1-10, February.
    14. Songsong Li & Daquan Gao & Xiaofeng Hui & Wei Zhang, 2021. "Corporate Governance, Agency Costs, and Corporate Sustainable Development: A Mediating Effect Analysis," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-15, May.
    15. Maha Alandejani & Habiba Al-Shaer, 2023. "Macro Uncertainty Impacts on ESG Performance and Carbon Emission Reduction Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Lily Fang & Ayako Yasuda, 2009. "The Effectiveness of Reputation as a Disciplinary Mechanism in Sell-Side Research," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(9), pages 3735-3777, September.
    17. Anthony, Joseph H. & Ramesh, K., 1992. "Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices : A test of the life cycle hypothesis," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2-3), pages 203-227, August.
    18. Ren, Xiaohang & Zeng, Gudian & Zhao, Yang, 2023. "Digital finance and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Gillan, Stuart L., 2006. "Recent Developments in Corporate Governance: An Overview," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 381-402, June.
    20. Hsu, Chia-Wen & Lien, Yung-Chih & Chen, Homin, 2013. "International ambidexterity and firm performance in small emerging economies," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 58-67.
    21. Sang‐Bum Park, 2018. "Multinationals and sustainable development: Does internationalization develop corporate sustainability of emerging market multinationals?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1514-1524, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Zeng & X. Xu & H. Yin & C. Tam, 2012. "Factors that Drive Chinese Listed Companies in Voluntary Disclosure of Environmental Information," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 309-321, September.
    2. Guidry, Ronald P. & Patten, Dennis M., 2012. "Voluntary disclosure theory and financial control variables: An assessment of recent environmental disclosure research," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 81-90.
    3. Hua Yin & Mingyu Li & Yuan Ma & Qiang Zhang, 2019. "The Relationship between Environmental Information Disclosure and Profitability: A Comparison between Different Disclosure Styles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Ismail N.B. & Sébastien Alcouffe & Galy N & Ceulemans K, 2020. "The impact of international sustainability initiatives on Life Cycle Assessment voluntary disclosures: The case of France’s CAC40 listed companies," Post-Print hal-03082800, HAL.
    5. Qiu, Yan & Shaukat, Amama & Tharyan, Rajesh, 2016. "Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 102-116.
    6. Omaima A.G. Hassan, 2018. "The impact of voluntary environmental disclosure on firm value: Does organizational visibility play a mediation role?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1569-1582, December.
    7. José Luis Fernández Sánchez & Ladislao Luna Sotorrío & Elisa Baraibar Díez, 2011. "The relationship between corporate governance and corporate social behavior: a structural equation model analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 91-101, March.
    8. Fatemi, Ali & Glaum, Martin & Kaiser, Stefanie, 2018. "ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 45-64.
    9. Jiang, Yan & Luo, Le & Xu, JianFeng & Shao, XiaoRui, 2021. "The value relevance of corporate voluntary carbon disclosure: Evidence from the United States and BRIC countries," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3).
    10. Jean-Noël Chauvey & Sophie Giordano-Spring & Charles Cho & Dennis Patten, 2015. "The Normativity and Legitimacy of CSR Disclosure: Evidence from France," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(4), pages 789-803, September.
    11. Katia Furlotti & Tatiana Mazza & Veronica Tibiletti & Silvia Triani, 2019. "Women in top positions on boards of directors: Gender policies disclosed in Italian sustainability reporting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 57-70, January.
    12. Riccardo Torelli & Federica Balluchi & Katia Furlotti, 2020. "The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 470-484, March.
    13. Ishmael Tingbani & Lyton Chithambo & Venancio Tauringana & Nikolaos Papanikolaou, 2020. "Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2194-2210, September.
    14. Yongjun Tang & Qi Li & Fen Zhou & Mingjia Sun, 2024. "Does Clan Culture Promote Corporate Natural Resource Disclosure? Evidence from Chinese Natural Resource-Based Listed Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(1), pages 167-190, June.
    15. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1027-1047, September.
    16. Zhang, Chenyu & Qian, Aimin & Lou, Xu & Zhang, Guiling, 2024. "The politics of corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1406-1428.
    17. Goergen, Marc & Mira, Svetlana, 2023. "Measuring the ownership and control of UK listed firms: Some methodological challenges," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(6).
    18. Douglas A. Adu & Antoinette Flynn & Colette Grey, 2022. "Executive compensation and sustainable business practices: The moderating role of sustainability‐based compensation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 698-736, March.
    19. Charles H. Cho & Jonathan Maurice & Emmanuelle Nègre & Marie-Anne Verdier, 2016. "Is environmental disclosure good for the environment? A meta-analysis and research agenda," Post-Print halshs-01369422, HAL.
    20. Shiyu Wu & Xinyi Li & Xiaosen Du & Zexin Li, 2022. "The Impact of ESG Performance on Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Ownership Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1684-:d:1593624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.