IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1563-d1590812.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taxation Business Environment Optimization and Enterprise Innovation Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China’s Policy Tests

Author

Listed:
  • Tong Yang

    (School of Finance and Public Administration, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030, China)

  • Cui Zhang

    (School of Finance and Public Administration, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030, China)

Abstract

Optimizing the tax business environment is of crucial significance for enhancing enterprise innovation efficiency and fostering sustainable development. This study utilizes the dataset of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2013 to 2022. By leveraging the quasi-natural experiment of the “Decentralization, Management and Service” reform pilot in the tax system, it adopts the multi-period difference-in-differences method to empirically investigate the impact of tax business environment optimization on enterprise innovation efficiency. The research reveals that the “Decentralization, Management, and Service” reform in the tax system exerts a significantly positive influence on enterprise innovation efficiency, and this result remains robust after a series of robustness tests. This optimization promotes enterprise innovation efficiency through three main channels: alleviating financing constraints, reducing transaction costs, and enhancing digitalization levels. The promoting effect is more pronounced for enterprises in mid-western regions, non-state-owned enterprises, large-scale enterprises, and those with high innovation endowments. Furthermore, it further contributes to the improvement of enterprise total factor productivity and the expansion of business scale, achieving the coordinated objectives of enhancing enterprise quality and efficiency and strengthening development momentum. These findings deepen our understanding of the economic implications of optimizing the tax business environment and offer empirical evidence for creating a conducive tax environment for the development of market entities.

Suggested Citation

  • Tong Yang & Cui Zhang, 2025. "Taxation Business Environment Optimization and Enterprise Innovation Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China’s Policy Tests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1563-:d:1590812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1563/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1563/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin, Jie & Wang, Fan, 2024. "Impact of government support on firm carbon emission efficiency: The transmission channel of green innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Zhaoteng Zeng & Xiao Yu, 2024. "The connotation, cause, and reform path of institutional transaction costs: a grounded theory analysis," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(5), pages 893-914, September.
    3. Hu, Hui & Qi, Shaozhou & Chen, Yuanzhi, 2023. "Using green technology for a better tomorrow: How enterprises and government utilize the carbon trading system and incentive policies," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Pan, Wenrong & Xie, Tao & Wang, Zhuwang & Ma, Lisha, 2022. "Digital economy: An innovation driver for total factor productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 303-311.
    5. Chuanhao Liu & Peng Cui & Hongxia Zhao & Zhanzhen Zhang & Yanshuo Zhu & Huijiao Liu, 2024. "Green Finance, Economic Policy Uncertainty, and Corporate ESG Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Baker, Andrew C. & Larcker, David F. & Wang, Charles C.Y., 2022. "How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 370-395.
    7. Callaway, Brantly & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C., 2021. "Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 200-230.
    8. James Levinsohn & Amil Petrin, 2003. "Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 70(2), pages 317-341.
    9. Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Elias Einiö & Ralf Martin & Kieu-Trang Nguyen & John Van Reenen, 2023. "Do Tax Incentives Increase Firm Innovation? An RD Design for R&D, Patents, and Spillovers," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 486-521, November.
    10. Min, Sujin & Kim, Juseong & Sawng, Yeong-Wha, 2020. "The effect of innovation network size and public R&D investment on regional innovation efficiency," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. H. Spencer Banzhaf & Randall P. Walsh, 2008. "Do People Vote with Their Feet? An Empirical Test of Tiebout," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(3), pages 843-863, June.
    12. Hao, Xiaoli & Miao, Erxiang & Sun, Qingyu & Li, Ke & Wen, Shufang & Xue, Yan, 2024. "The impact of digital government on corporate green innovation: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melnik, Walter & Smyth, Andrew, 2024. "R&D tax credits and innovation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. Jaqueline Hansen & Valeria Merlo & Georg Wamser, 2023. "Taxes, Profit Shifting, and the Real Activities of MNEs: Evidence from Corporate Tax Notches," CESifo Working Paper Series 10593, CESifo.
    3. Klaas Mulier & Mike Mariathasan & Ozan Guler & Andrea Caggese, 2022. "Firing Costs and Productivity: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Working Papers 1376, Barcelona School of Economics.
    4. Wan, Panbing & Zhang, ZhongXiang & Chen, Lin, 2024. "Environmental co-benefits of climate mitigation: Evidence from clean development mechanism projects in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    5. Nobuya FUKUGAWA & Kuo-I CHANG, 2025. "Science Parks in Taiwan and Their Value-adding Contributions," Discussion papers 25005, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    6. Ichev, Riste & Valentinčič, Aljoša, 2025. "The effect of impact investing on performance of private firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    7. Alex Hollingsworth & Krzysztof Karbownik & Melissa A. Thomasson & Anthony Wray, 2024. "The Gift of a Lifetime: The Hospital, Modern Medicine, and Mortality," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(7), pages 2201-2238, July.
    8. Zhaohui Yan & Mingli Wang & Yumeng Sun & Zihui Nan, 2023. "The Impact of Research and Development Investment on Total Factor Productivity of Animal Husbandry Enterprises: Evidence from Listed Companies in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Rik Chakraborti & Gavin Roberts, 2023. "How price-gouging regulation undermined COVID-19 mitigation: county-level evidence of unintended consequences," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 51-83, July.
    10. Brugués, Felipe & Brugués, Javier & Giambra, Samuele, 2024. "Political connections and misallocation of procurement contracts: Evidence from Ecuador," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    11. Gaygysyz Ashyrov & Denis Ivanov, 2024. "Mega‐events and human rights violations: Empirical evidence from the long‐term perspective," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 71(2), pages 175-196, May.
    12. Yuan Qiu & Di Zhou, 2024. "De‐politicization and corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3668-3684, July.
    13. Jerch, Rhiannon & Kahn, Matthew E. & Lin, Gary C., 2023. "Local public finance dynamics and hurricane shocks," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Chy, Mahfuz & Kyung, Hoyoun, 2023. "The effect of bond market transparency on bank loan contracting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2).
    15. Gong, Zheng & Gong, Liuji, 2024. "The financial geographic structure, Confucian culture, and corporate asset allocation efficiency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    16. Mikhail Mamonov & Anna Pestova & Steven Ongena, 2023. "“Crime and Punishment”? How Banks Anticipate and Propagate Global Financial Sanctions," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp753, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    17. Li, Daiyue & Jin, Yanhong & Cheng, Mingwang, 2024. "Unleashing the power of industrial robotics on firm productivity: Evidence from China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 500-520.
    18. Giuseppe Rose & Francesco Mazzulla, 2023. "Relaxing Occupational Licensing In Italy: A Staggered Difference In Differences Analysis Using Balance-Sheet Data Of Italian Pharmacies," Working Papers 202302, Università della Calabria, Dipartimento di Economia, Statistica e Finanza "Giovanni Anania" - DESF.
    19. Crescioli, Tommaso, 2024. "Reinforcing each other: How the combination of European and domestic reforms increased competition in liberalized industries," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    20. Julie Moschion & Jan C. van Ours, 2025. "Lifting up the lives of extremely disadvantaged youth: The role of staying in school longer," Papers 2025-02, Centre for Health Economics, Monash University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1563-:d:1590812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.