IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1502-d1589160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Farmers’ Participation in Rural Living Environmental Governance Behavior—Evidence from Jiangsu Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Lisha Yang

    (School of Economics, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Shuang Tan

    (School of Economics, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Rao Yuan

    (School of Economics, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

Abstract

The participation of farmers in environmental governance is not simply the behavior choice of individuals but is also influenced by their socioeconomic status (SES). Using survey data from 2088 peasant households in Jiangsu Province, China, this study used the ordered probit model to identify the differential impacts of objective socioeconomic status (OSES) and subjective socioeconomic status (SSES) on farmers’ participation in rural living environmental governance behavior (FPLEB). The mediation effect model was also used to explore the mediating role of environmental cognition in the relationship between SES and FPLEB. The results reveal that (1) SES (i.e., OSES and SSES) is a positive factor affecting farmers’ involvement in improving their living environment, with SSES demonstrating a stronger correlation with efforts to enhance rural living conditions than OSES, (2) environmental knowledge and pollution cognition serve as mediating factors, bridging the effect of OSES on the level of participation in environmental governance, and (3) SES (i.e., OSES and SSES) is more effective in fostering future-oriented environmental governance behaviors among farmers than those with a present-oriented mindset.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisha Yang & Shuang Tan & Rao Yuan, 2025. "Exploring the Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Farmers’ Participation in Rural Living Environmental Governance Behavior—Evidence from Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1502-:d:1589160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1502/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1502/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ying Ma & Mansoor Ahmed Koondhar & Shengke Liu & Huiling Wang & Rong Kong, 2020. "Perceived Value Influencing the Household Waste Sorting Behaviors in Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Lin Meng & Wentao Si, 2022. "Pro-Environmental Behavior: Examining the Role of Ecological Value Cognition, Environmental Attitude, and Place Attachment among Rural Farmers in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Cuicui Xiao & Jingbo Zhou & Xingxing Shen & Jonathan Cullen & Susie Dobson & Fanran Meng & Xiaoxia Wang, 2022. "Rural Living Environment Governance: A Survey and Comparison between Two Villages in Henan Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Xiaobao Li & Houchao Lyu, 2022. "Social Status and Subjective Well-Being in Chinese Adults: Mediating Effect of Future Time Perspective," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(4), pages 2101-2116, August.
    5. Keiko Katagiri & Ju-Hyun Kim, 2018. "Factors determining the social participation of older adults: A comparison between Japan and Korea using EASS 2012," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Irene Tilikidou & Antonia Delistavrou, 2008. "Types and influential factors of consumers' non‐purchasing ecological behaviors," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 61-76, January.
    7. Boubakri, Narjess & Cosset, Jean-Claude & Saffar, Walid, 2008. "Political connections of newly privatized firms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 654-673, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ding, Mingfa, 2014. "Political Connections and Stock Liquidity: Political Network, Hierarchy and Intervention," Knut Wicksell Working Paper Series 2014/7, Lund University, Knut Wicksell Centre for Financial Studies.
    2. Hou, Qingsong & Hu, May & Yuan, Yuan, 2017. "Corporate innovation and political connections in Chinese listed firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 46(PA), pages 158-176.
    3. Tang, Xuesong & Lin, Yan & Peng, Qing & Du, Jun & Chan, Kam C., 2016. "Politically connected directors and firm value: Evidence from forced resignations in China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 148-167.
    4. Liu, Li & Liu, Qigui & Tian, Gary & Wang, Peipei, 2018. "Government connections and the persistence of profitability: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 110-129.
    5. Li, Jie & Guo, Xiaowei & Huang, Bihong & Zhou, Tianhang, 2024. "Political connections and zombie firms: The role of the 2008 stimulus plan in China," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. Ang, James & Knill, April & Mauck, Nathan, 2017. "Cross-border opportunity sets: An international empirical study based on ownership types," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 1-26.
    7. Mouna Mrad & Slaheddine Hallara, 2014. "The Relationship Between the Board of Directors and the Performance/Value Creation in a Context of Privatization: The Case of French Companies," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 83-108, March.
    8. repec:tur:wpaper:9 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Yuxuan Li & Xin Miao & Dequan Zheng & Yanhong Tang, 2019. "Corporate Public Transparency on Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Political Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Boggio, Margherita, 2011. "Municipal capitalism, regulatory federalism and politics," MPRA Paper 46244, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Chune Young Chung & Jung Hoon Byun & Jason Young, 2019. "Corporate Political Ties and Firm Value: Comparative Analysis in the Korean Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Ghulam, Yaseen, 2021. "Institutions and firms’ technological changes and productivity growth," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    13. Deng, Yuping & Wu, Yanrui & Xu, Helian, 2019. "Political turnover and firm pollution discharges: An empirical study," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    14. Abubakr Saeed & Yacine Belghitar & Ephraim Clark, 2017. "Political connections and firm operational efficiencies: evidence from a developing country," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 191-224, January.
    15. Susmita Sarmin & Atia Shahin & Md. Faruq Hasan, 2024. "Influence of socio-demographic and psychological factors on shaping farmers’ pro-environmental behavior in Dinajpur, Bangladesh," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 1017-1049, December.
    16. Belkhir, Mohamed & Ben-Nasr, Hamdi, 2016. "Labor protection and the privatization or partial privatization method," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 305-322.
    17. Zhe Tang, 2020. "Political connection and corporate innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 1-6.
    18. Xuezhen Xu & Fang Wang & Tao Xu & Sufyan Ullah Khan, 2023. "How Does Capital Endowment Impact Farmers’ Green Production Behavior? Perspectives on Ecological Cognition and Environmental Regulation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    19. Agoraki, Maria-Eleni K. & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Kouretas, Georgios P., 2022. "U.S. banks’ IPOs and political money contributions," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    20. Rui Wang & Yi-Na Li & Jiuchang Wei, 2022. "Growing in the changing global landscape: the intangible resources and performance of high-tech corporates," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 999-1022, September.
    21. Bach Q. Ho & Kunio Shirahada, 2022. "Older People’s Knowledge Creation Motivations for Sustainable Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1502-:d:1589160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.