IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/apjors/v8y2024i4d10.1007_s41685-024-00351-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of socio-demographic and psychological factors on shaping farmers’ pro-environmental behavior in Dinajpur, Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Susmita Sarmin

    (Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University)

  • Atia Shahin

    (Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University)

  • Md. Faruq Hasan

    (Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University)

Abstract

Pro-environmental behavior (PEB) addresses environmental challenges such as climate change, pollution, habitat loss, and resource depletion. This research aimed to identify the most influential factors shaping farmers’ pro-environmental behavior. The study was conducted in Biral and Kaharol upazila of Dinajpur District in Bangladesh. One hundred and thirty-eight (138) farmers participating in the Climate Smart Agriculture and Water Management Project (CSAWMP) were selected as samples through a simple random sampling procedure. The pro-environmental behavior of the farmers was measured using a five-point rating scale with 24 items under four dimensions. Internal consistency, composite reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the constructs were ensured before data collection. The data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire from September 2023 to February 2024. Statistical analyses, viz. correlation analysis, regression analysis (multiple linear and stepwise), and path analysis, were performed using SPSS, SPSS AMOS, and SmartPLS 4 software. Most farmers exhibited moderate pro-environmental behavior and adopted practices under the ‘social environmentalism’ dimension (mean = 4.5). Overall, the socio-psychological variables had the greatest influence (62.9%) on farmers’ pro-environmental behavior, where environmental knowledge was the sole contributor of approximately 48.8%, followed by environmental attitude (ΔR2 = 10%). According to the path analysis, environmental knowledge had the greatest direct effect (0.488), and ‘environmental self-efficacy’ had the greatest indirect effect (0.430) (in the positive direction) on the dependent variable. In contrast, age had the greatest indirect effect (−0.461) in the negative direction. Interventions such as community education programs, policies addressing psychological barriers and socio-economic disparities, and incentivized green technologies should be employed to ensure environmental sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Susmita Sarmin & Atia Shahin & Md. Faruq Hasan, 2024. "Influence of socio-demographic and psychological factors on shaping farmers’ pro-environmental behavior in Dinajpur, Bangladesh," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 1017-1049, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:apjors:v:8:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s41685-024-00351-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s41685-024-00351-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41685-024-00351-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41685-024-00351-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pro-environmental behavior; Environmental citizenship; SEM; Social environmentalism; PEB;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:apjors:v:8:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s41685-024-00351-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.