IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p1336-d1585242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comprehensive Model of Green Brand Assessment in the IT Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Ligia Maria Nan

    (Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Robotics and Production Management, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
    Institute for Research in Circular Economy and Environment “Ernest Lupan”, 400561 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Roxana Lavinia Pacurariu

    (Institute for Research in Circular Economy and Environment “Ernest Lupan”, 400561 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Elena Simina Lakatos

    (Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Robotics and Production Management, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
    Institute for Research in Circular Economy and Environment “Ernest Lupan”, 400561 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Laura Bacali

    (Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Robotics and Production Management, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Răzvan Hoinaru

    (Department of Accounting and Audit, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Lucian-Ionel Cioca

    (Institute for Research in Circular Economy and Environment “Ernest Lupan”, 400561 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
    Industrial Engineering and Management Department, Faculty of Engineering, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550024 Sibiu, Romania)

Abstract

This study explores the ways we can evaluate green brands in the IT industry. It is important to have a method to assess the impact that these companies have on the environment and on ourselves. The model aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation framework, contributing to long-term value creation by aligning brand performance with sustainability and responsible practices. For this study, we will assess both financial indicators, such as the economic growth and economic efficiency of the brand, and non-financial indicators that deal with the environmental and social metrics. The proposed evaluation method is based on data collected through studies and literature reviews and through exploratory research, by applying a questionnaire. The study also examined key factors like energy efficiency, e-waste management, and environmental certifications. The analysis demonstrated the necessity for IT green brands to be evaluated, to have their environmental impact measured and assessed by a scoring system. Return on Green Equity (ROGE) and Return on Green Investment (GROI) are the indicators used with their corresponding mathematical formulas. The promotion of environmentally sustainable procedures for IT brands is the main goal as an evaluation model, more specifically, to distribute information to stakeholders and at the same time to support them in the transition towards efficient and sustainable production and consumption patterns. This study provides a structured framework for assessing the impact of green brands within the IT industry, using specific mathematical formulas. These indicators can influence consumer purchasing behavior, resulting in the development of a green and sustainable market, also encompassing macroeconomic impacts through changing buyer behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Ligia Maria Nan & Roxana Lavinia Pacurariu & Elena Simina Lakatos & Laura Bacali & Răzvan Hoinaru & Lucian-Ionel Cioca, 2025. "A Comprehensive Model of Green Brand Assessment in the IT Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1336-:d:1585242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1336/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1336/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Murphy, 2009. "The Relevance of Responsibility to Ethical Business Decisions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 245-252, November.
    2. Dawit Bahta & Jiang Yun & Md Rashidul Islam & Kuyon Joseph Bikanyi, 2021. "How does CSR enhance the financial performance of SMEs? The mediating role of firm reputation," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 1428-1451, January.
    3. Bashar Barakat & Marwan Milhem & Gehad Mohammed Ahmed Naji & Mohammed Alzoraiki & Habsah Binti Muda & Ali Ateeq & Zahida Abro, 2023. "Assessing the Impact of Green Training on Sustainable Business Advantage: Exploring the Mediating Role of Green Supply Chain Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Yijun Zhang & Suzanne Mavoa & Jinfeng Zhao & Deborah Raphael & Melody Smith, 2020. "The Association between Green Space and Adolescents’ Mental Well-Being: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-26, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ye Sang & Eunkyoung Han, 2023. "A win‐win way for corporate and stakeholders to achieve sustainable development: Corporate social responsibility value co‐creation scale development and validation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1177-1190, May.
    2. Khawar Ahmed Khan & Fei Ma & Muhammad Ali Akbar & Mohammad Shariful Islam & Maryam Ali & Shaif Noor, 2024. "Reverse Logistics Practices: A Dilemma to Gain Competitive Advantage in Manufacturing Industries of Pakistan with Organization Performance as a Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Megan Rowley & Raluca Topciu & Matthew Owens, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Mechanisms Underpinning Psychological Change Following Nature Exposure in an Adolescent Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Amber L. Pearson & Catherine D. Brown & Aaron Reuben & Natalie Nicholls & Karin A. Pfeiffer & Kimberly A. Clevenger, 2023. "Elementary Classroom Views of Nature Are Associated with Lower Child Externalizing Behavior Problems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Na’Taki Osborne Jelks & Viniece Jennings & Alessandro Rigolon, 2021. "Green Gentrification and Health: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Ursula Pool & Anna Kenyon & Lynn Froggett & Mark Dooris, 2023. "Beside the Seaside: Reflections on Local Green and Blue Spaces from Adults Aged over 50 in a Coastal Community," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-13, July.
    7. Sonia Dickinson‐Delaporte & Kathleen Mortimer & Gayle Kerr & David S Waller & Alice Kendrick, 2020. "Power and responsibility: Advertising self‐regulation and consumer protection in a digital world," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 675-700, June.
    8. Mariana Cernicova-Buca & Vasile Gherheș & Ciprian Obrad, 2023. "Residents’ Satisfaction with Green Spaces and Daily Life in Small Urban Settings: Romanian Perspectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Da Mao & Huijie Yang & Shaohua Zhang & Haozhe Sun & Xiaojuan Wang, 2024. "Adaptive Behavioral Dynamics in Public Open Spaces During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Technological Perspective on Urban Resilience," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12651-12677, September.
    10. Ferdinando Fornara & Elena Rinallo & Massimiliano Scopelliti, 2023. "Contact with Nature in Social Deprivation during COVID-19: The Positive Impact on Anxiety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Martine Shareck & Eliana Aubé & Stephanie Sersli, 2023. "Neighborhood Physical and Social Environments and Social Inequalities in Health in Older Adolescents and Young Adults: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Sadler, Richard C. & Wojciechowski, Thomas W. & Buchalski, Zachary & Smart, Mieka & Mulheron, Megan & Todem, David, 2022. "Validating a geospatial healthfulness index with self-reported chronic disease and health outcomes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    13. Luísa Pinto, 2023. "A Qualitative Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility in Saudi Arabia’s Service Sector-Practices and Company Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, June.
    14. Ao Wang & Ziran Meng & Bing Zhao & Fan Zhang, 2024. "Using Social Media Data to Research the Impact of Campus Green Spaces on Students’ Emotions: A Case Study of Nanjing Campuses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Zhengyang Xu & Sofia Marini & Mario Mauro & Pasqualino Maietta Latessa & Alessia Grigoletto & Stefania Toselli, 2025. "Associations Between Urban Green Space Quality and Mental Wellbeing: Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Feltynowski, Marcin, 2023. "Urban green spaces in land-use policy – types of data, sources of data and staff – the case of Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    17. Sofia Baldessari & Isabella De Meo & Maria Giulia Cantiani & Alessandro Paletto, 2025. "Social Relevance of Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Green Infrastructures: A Mixed Qualitative–Quantitative Case Study Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Broccardo, Laura & Truant, Elisa & Dana, Léo-Paul, 2023. "The interlink between digitalization, sustainability, and performance: An Italian context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    19. Wendy Ellyatt, 2022. "Education for Human Flourishing—A New Conceptual Framework for Promoting Ecosystemic Wellbeing in Schools," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, November.
    20. Dan Li & Haiyun Xu & Yue Kang & Koen Steemers, 2023. "Systematic Review: Landscape Characteristics Correlated with Physical Activity of the Elderly People," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1336-:d:1585242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.