IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p1171-d1581455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ESG Performance Empowers Financial Flexibility in Manufacturing Firms—Empirical Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Jianzhi Wei

    (School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Xuesong He

    (School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Yawei Wu

    (School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

Abstract

In the context of slowing economic growth and increasing uncertainty, enhancing the financial flexibility of manufacturing enterprises is a critical foundation for promoting the high-quality development of the real economy. This study selects a sample of Chinese A-share-listed manufacturing firms from Shanghai and Shenzhen, spanning the years 2012 to 2022, and constructs a fixed-effects model to examine the impact of ESG performance on the financial flexibility of these firms and its underlying mechanisms. The study finds that: (1) ESG performance significantly enhances corporate financial flexibility. (2) ESG performance promotes financial flexibility primarily through mechanisms such as alleviating financing constraints, improving competitive advantages, and attracting analysts’ attention. (3) Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the positive effect of ESG performance on financial flexibility is more pronounced in high-tech firms and non-heavily-polluted firms. (4) Sub-dimensional analysis shows that corporate governance has a more significant impact on financial flexibility enhancement than social responsibility, while environmental investment exerts an inhibitory effect on financial flexibility. (5) The uncertainty associated with ESG ratings weakens the contribution of ESG practices to the financial flexibility of manufacturing firms. Based on these findings, this paper suggests that enterprises should be encouraged to actively adopt ESG practices, accelerate the improvement of their ESG disclosure systems, and support firms with strong ESG performance to foster high-quality development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianzhi Wei & Xuesong He & Yawei Wu, 2025. "ESG Performance Empowers Financial Flexibility in Manufacturing Firms—Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1171-:d:1581455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1171/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1171/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandre Sanches Garcia & Renato J. Orsato, 2020. "Testing the institutional difference hypothesis: A study about environmental, social, governance, and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3261-3272, December.
    2. Haoyu Gao & Hui Wang & Xinyu Wang & Huiyu Wen, 2024. "ESG‐oriented analysts and corporate green innovation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(S1), pages 4977-5008, December.
    3. George Serafeim & Aaron Yoon, 2023. "Stock price reactions to ESG news: the role of ESG ratings and disagreement," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1500-1530, September.
    4. Lirong Chen & Siyi Liu & Xin Liu & Jiani Wang, 2022. "The Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme and Corporate Environmental Investments: A Quasi-natural Experiment from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(9), pages 2670-2681, July.
    5. Anis Maaloul & Daniel Zéghal & Walid Ben Amar & Sari Mansour, 2023. "The Effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance and Disclosure on Cost of Debt: The Mediating Effect of Corporate Reputation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(1), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Dingzu Zhang & Luqi Liu, 2022. "Does ESG Performance Enhance Financial Flexibility? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Li, Ziwei & Hyung, Dae Eun & Lee, Dong Young, 2025. "Financial flexibility and corporate financing efficiency," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    8. Rajna Gibson Brandon & Philipp Krueger & Peter Steffen Schmidt, 2021. "ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(4), pages 104-127, October.
    9. Vashisht, Rupali & Calvo-Pardo, Hector & Olmo, Jose, 2025. "A causal analysis of environmental and financial performance: Differences between brown and green firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Fisher-Vanden, Karen & Thorburn, Karin S., 2011. "Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives and shareholder wealth," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 430-445.
    11. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    12. Sanchez, Ron, 2004. "Understanding competence-based management: Identifying and managing five modes of competence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(5), pages 518-532, May.
    13. Michael L. Barnett & Robert M. Salomon, 2012. "Does it pay to be really good? addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(11), pages 1304-1320, November.
    14. Avramov, Doron & Cheng, Si & Lioui, Abraham & Tarelli, Andrea, 2022. "Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 642-664.
    15. Sanghyuk Byun & Kristin C. Roland, 2022. "Quarterly earnings thresholds: Making the case for prior quarter earnings," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5-6), pages 690-716, May.
    16. Aaron K. Chatterji & Rodolphe Durand & David I. Levine & Samuel Touboul, 2016. "Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1597-1614, August.
    17. Steven N. Kaplan & Luigi Zingales, 1997. "Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(1), pages 169-215.
    18. Markus Hang & Jerome Geyer‐Klingeberg & Andreas W. Rathgeber, 2019. "It is merely a matter of time: A meta‐analysis of the causality between environmental performance and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 257-273, February.
    19. Li, WeiWei & Padmanabhan, Prasad & Huang, Chia-Hsing, 2024. "Directors' & Officers' liability insurance and financing decisions: Evidence from debt structure choice," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Ge & Cheng, Yuxiang, 2024. "Impact of environmental, social, and governance rating disagreement on real earnings management in Chinese listed companies," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    2. Tsang, Albert & Wang, Yujie & Xiang, Yi & Yu, Li, 2024. "The rise of ESG rating agencies and management of corporate ESG violations," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Hu, Kexin & Li, Xingyi & Li, Zhongfei, 2024. "Effect of ESG rating disagreement on stock price informativeness: Empirical evidence from China's capital market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    4. Liu, Xiangqiang & Yang, Qingqing & Wei, Kai & Dai, Peng-Fei, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and idiosyncratic return volatility: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    5. Muck, Matthias & Schmidl, Thomas, 2024. "Comparing ESG score weighting approaches and stock performance differentiation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    6. Cini, Federico & Ferrari, Annalisa, 2025. "Towards the estimation of ESG ratings: A machine learning approach using balance sheet ratios," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PB).
    7. Horky, Florian & Pasquali, Andrea & Magazzino, Cosimo, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement portfolios – Evidence from the EuroStoxx 600," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PA).
    8. Horn, Matthias & Oehler, Andreas, 2024. "Constructing stock portfolios by sorting on ESG ratings: Does the rating provider matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    9. Cheng, Louis T.W. & Cheong, Tsun Se & Wojewodzki, Michal & Chui, David, 2025. "The effect of ESG divergence on the financial performance of Hong Kong-listed firms: An artificial neural network approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    10. Michele Rubino & Ilaria Mastrorocco & Giovanni Maria Garegnani, 2024. "The influence of market and institutional factors on ESG rating disagreement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3916-3926, September.
    11. Guo, Kun & Bian, Yuan & Zhang, Dayong & Ji, Qiang, 2024. "ESG performance and corporate external financing in China: The role of rating disagreement," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    12. Ling, Shixian & Xia, Hui & Liu, Zhangxin (Frank), 2024. "ESG rating divergence and audit fees: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    13. Li, Li & Zhang, Du & Li, Rongrong, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and corporate innovation: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    14. Jian Zhou & Xiaodong Lei & Jianglong Yu, 2024. "ESG rating divergence and corporate green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2911-2930, May.
    15. Geng, Yuan & Chen, Jinyu & Liu, Ran, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and corporate green innovation bubbles: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    16. Qian, Binsheng & Poshakwale, Sunil & Tan, Yusen, 2024. "‘E’ of ESG and firm performance: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    17. Liu, Xiangqiang & Liu, Jiayi & Liu, Jia & Zhai, Qiong, 2024. "Can investor-firm interactions mitigate ESG rating divergence? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    18. Chibane, Messaoud & Joubrel, Mathieu, 2024. "The ESG-efficient frontier under ESG rating uncertainty," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    19. Wang, Jianli & Wang, Shaolin & Dong, Minghua & Wang, Hongxia, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and stock returns: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    20. Zou, Jin & Yan, Jingzhou & Deng, Guoying, 2023. "ESG rating confusion and bond spreads," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1171-:d:1581455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.