IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v96y2024ipas1057521924005441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can investor-firm interactions mitigate ESG rating divergence? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Xiangqiang
  • Liu, Jiayi
  • Liu, Jia
  • Zhai, Qiong

Abstract

This study empirically examines whether investor-firm interactions significantly influence the ESG rating disagreement among A-share listed companies in China. We use Q&A data between 2015 and 2021 from the Easy Interaction and E-Interaction platforms of the Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Exchanges (SZSE and SSE). Our results reveal that investor-firm interaction can significantly reduce the ESG rating divergence, and this result remains robust after robustness tests. The mechanism test suggests that interactions related to ESG theme can improve the ESG disclosure quality and increase ESG practices; this leads to reduced information asymmetry, thus easing rating divergence. Further, the effect is more pronounced when listed companies' ESG disclosures are similar to those in their industry, non-centralized enterprises, low corporate governance level, and fewer green investors. From the ESG rating divergence mitigation perspective, this study provides empirical evidence on the economic consequences of emerging capital markets regarding investor-firm interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Xiangqiang & Liu, Jiayi & Liu, Jia & Zhai, Qiong, 2024. "Can investor-firm interactions mitigate ESG rating divergence? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:96:y:2024:i:pa:s1057521924005441
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924005441
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103612?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:96:y:2024:i:pa:s1057521924005441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.