IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p1162-d1581237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Mechanisms and Pathways Through Which the Digital Transformation of Manufacturing Enterprises Enhances Green and Low-Carbon Performance Under the “Dual Carbon” Goals

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Peng Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Xi’an Aeronautical Institute, Xi’an 710077, China)

  • Xiaofei Wang

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

Abstract

The coordinated development of digitalization and greening is essential for economic transformation and upgrading, especially given the pressing global carbon emission challenges. China’s commitment to achieving “dual carbon” goals highlights the need for sustainable solutions, particularly in the manufacturing sector, which is a significant source of energy consumption and emissions; carbon emissions account for more than 30%. Integrating advanced digital technologies with manufacturing is critical for reducing carbon and sustainable growth. According to the research results, more than 70% of scholars believe that digital transformation boosts green innovation and low-carbon development, but the mechanisms still need to be clarified, slowing transformation efforts and reducing efficiency. Taking the intellectualization and green low-carbon development of manufacturing enterprises as latent variables, and taking the nine paths obtained by scholars’ research results and investigation interviews to promote green low-carbon performance as observation variables, this paper constructs a structural equation model and deeply explores the mechanism and paths of the intellectualization transformation of manufacturing enterprises affecting carbon reduction, emission reduction and sustainable development of enterprises. The research results show that the digital intelligent transformation of manufacturing enterprises affects the green and low-carbon performance improvement and sustainable development of enterprises through technological innovation, industrial structure transformation and upgrading, and reshaping resource allocation. These strategies lower energy use and emissions, strengthen sustainability, and improve green performance. The findings offer theoretical and practical insights, providing a roadmap for efficient digital transformation in manufacturing to achieve the “dual carbon” goals and support sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Liu & Peng Zhang & Xiaofei Wang, 2025. "Exploring the Mechanisms and Pathways Through Which the Digital Transformation of Manufacturing Enterprises Enhances Green and Low-Carbon Performance Under the “Dual Carbon” Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-25, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1162-:d:1581237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1162/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1162/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armin Schmutzler, 2001. "Environmental Regulations and Managerial Myopia," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 18(1), pages 87-100, January.
    2. Marit E. Klemetsen & Brita Bye & Arvid Raknerud, 2018. "Can Direct Regulations Spur Innovations in Environmental Technologies? A Study on Firm‐Level Patenting," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 120(2), pages 338-371, April.
    3. David Gligor & Mary Holcomb & Michael J. Maloni & Elizabeth Davis‐Sramek, 2019. "Achieving Financial Performance in Uncertain Times: Leveraging Supply Chain Agility," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(4), pages 247-279, October.
    4. Gray, Wayne B. & Deily, Mary E., 1996. "Compliance and Enforcement: Air Pollution Regulation in the U.S. Steel Industry," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 96-111, July.
    5. Huang, Chenchen & Lin, Boqiang, 2024. "Digital economy solutions towards carbon neutrality: The critical role of energy efficiency and energy structure transformation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    6. Long Xue & Qianyu Zhang & Xuemang Zhang & Chengyu Li, 2022. "Can Digital Transformation Promote Green Technology Innovation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Guandalini, Ilaria, 2022. "Sustainability through digital transformation: A systematic literature review for research guidance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 456-471.
    8. Xiaoke Zhao & Xuhui Ding & Liang Li, 2021. "Research on Environmental Regulation, Technological Innovation and Green Transformation of Manufacturing Industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2020. "Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(6), pages 2188-2244.
    10. Severin Borenstein & James Bushnell & Frank A. Wolak & Matthew Zaragoza-Watkins, 2019. "Expecting the Unexpected: Emissions Uncertainty and Environmental Market Design," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(11), pages 3953-3977, November.
    11. Lisi Tan & Zhuodong Yang & Muhammad Irfan & Chante Jian Ding & Mingjun Hu & Jin Hu, 2024. "Toward low‐carbon sustainable development: Exploring the impact of digital economy development and industrial restructuring," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2159-2172, March.
    12. Gollop, Frank M & Roberts, Mark J, 1983. "Environmental Regulations and Productivity Growth: The Case of Fossil-Fueled Electric Power Generation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 91(4), pages 654-674, August.
    13. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    14. Sainan Cheng & Guohua Qu, 2023. "Research on the Effect of Digital Economy on Carbon Emissions under the Background of “Double Carbon”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-27, March.
    15. Sayantan Khanra & Puneet Kaur & Rojers P Joseph & Ashish Malik & Amandeep Dhir, 2022. "A resource‐based view of green innovation as a strategic firm resource: Present status and future directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1395-1413, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen Weijun, 2022. "The Impact of Government Support and Technological Innovation on Enterprise Performance: A Case Study of Guangdong Hi- tech Enterprises," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 14(1), pages 196-231.
    2. Dietrich Earnhart & Dylan G. Rassier, 2016. "“Effective regulatory stringency” and firms’ profitability: the effects of effluent limits and government monitoring," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 111-145, October.
    3. Li, Bin & Guo, Fei & Xu, Lei & Meng, Siqi, 2024. "Fintech business and corporate social responsibility practices," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Huang, Chenchen & Min Du, Anna & Lin, Boqiang, 2025. "How does the digital economy affect the green transition: The role of industrial intelligence and E-commerce," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    5. Ronald Shadbegian & Wayne Gray, 2006. "Assessing multi-dimensional performance: environmental and economic outcomes," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 213-234, December.
    6. Xixiong Xu & Lingling Duan & Youliang Yan, 2019. "The Influence of Confucianism on Corporate Environmental Investment: Evidence from Chinese Private Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Christophe Combemale & Kate S Whitefoot & Laurence Ales & Erica R H Fuchs, 2021. "Not all technological change is equal: how the separability of tasks mediates the effect of technology change on skill demand [Patterns of industrial innovation]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(6), pages 1361-1387.
    8. Abdullah Kaid Al‐Swidi & Joseph F. Hair & Mohammed A. Al‐Hakimi, 2023. "Sustainable development‐oriented regulatory and competitive pressures to shift toward a circular economy: The role of environmental orientation and Industry 4.0 technologies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4782-4797, November.
    9. Zhaoqing Sun & Jianxu Liu & Roengchai Tansuchat, 2023. "China’s Digital Economy and Enterprise Labor Demand: The Mediating Effects of Green Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, July.
    10. Ljubica Nedelkoska & Frank Neffke, 2019. "Skill Mismatch and Skill Transferability: Review of Concepts and Measurements," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1921, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2019.
    11. Peng Liang & Xinhui Sun, 2024. "Does digital transformation promote the green innovation of China’s listed companies?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 22199-22235, September.
    12. Wayne B. Gray & Ronald J. Shadbegian, 2004. "When and Why Do Plants Comply? Paper Mills in the 1980s," NCEE Working Paper Series 200407, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Jul 2004.
    13. Ma, Yechi & Sha, Yezhou & Wang, Zilong & Zhang, Wenjing, 2023. "The effect of the policy mix of green credit and government subsidy on environmental innovation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    14. Jian Zhou & Xiaodong Lei & Jianglong Yu, 2024. "ESG rating divergence and corporate green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2911-2930, May.
    15. Paul Lanoie & Jérémy Laurent‐Lucchetti & Nick Johnstone & Stefan Ambec, 2011. "Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 803-842, September.
    16. Zhu, Minghao & Liang, Chen & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Zhou, Honggeng, 2024. "The impact of intelligent manufacturing on labor productivity: An empirical analysis of Chinese listed manufacturing companies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    17. Sascha Rexhäuser & Christian Rammer, 2014. "Environmental Innovations and Firm Profitability: Unmasking the Porter Hypothesis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 57(1), pages 145-167, January.
    18. Li, Zhensheng & Zhu, Junpeng & Wang, Shuqiong, 2024. "Environmental regulation, intelligent manufacturing and corporate investment & financing: Evidence from industrial robot investment," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    19. Valero-Gil, Jesús & Suárez-Perales, Inés & Garcés-Ayerbe, Concepción & Rivera-Torres, Pilar, 2024. "Navigating toward the promised land of digitalization and sustainability convergence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    20. Marina Dabić & Jane Maley & Leo-Paul Dana & Ivan Novak & Massimiliano M. Pellegrini & Andrea Caputo, 2020. "Pathways of SME internationalization: a bibliometric and systematic review," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 705-725, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1162-:d:1581237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.