IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p1027-d1578205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Farms to Forests: An Exploration of Afforestation Efforts in Poland Under the Rural Development Programme (2007–2020)

Author

Listed:
  • Anna M. Klepacka

    (Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, Polish Academy of Sciences, 00-330 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Andrzej A. Romaniuk

    (Software Sustainability Institute, EPCC, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9BT, UK)

  • Janusz Gajda

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, 00-241 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Ewa E. Chećko

    (Department of Forestry and Forest Ecology, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

Forests are important in mitigating climate change and addressing biodiversity loss. In Poland, where forest cover has steadily increased since World War II, afforestation of agricultural land has emerged as a key strategy supported by both EU and national policies. This study evaluates the implementation of Poland’s afforestation programs under the Rural Development Programme (RDP) for the periods of 2007–2013 and 2014–2020 using data provided by the Agency for Restructuring and Modernisation of Agriculture (ARMA) and focusing on the financial incentives offered to private landowners and regional variations in their uptake. Results show that afforestation under the RDP aligned with the EU climate neutrality goals, with a total of 37,721 hectares afforested and PLN 243.5 million handed as financial support, predominantly (81%) over the first studied period. The largest afforestation efforts were observed in the Mazowieckie and Warmińsko-Mazurskie voivodeships, with Warszawa, Poland’s capital, achieving the highest municipal afforestation area across both periods. Financial considerations influenced farmer participation, but rising land prices and historical land use patterns were contributing factors. Urban afforestation and increasing demand for woody biomass further highlight the benefits of afforestation. However, conifer-dominated stands, prevalent on low-quality land, can present challenges to ecosystem stability under future climate scenarios, necessitating diversification towards deciduous species. Additionally, low uptake during the 2014–2020 period showcases the need for improved incentives to bolster participation. Still, afforestation presents significant economic and environmental opportunities, advancing long-term policy objectives while addressing critical challenges in climate.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna M. Klepacka & Andrzej A. Romaniuk & Janusz Gajda & Ewa E. Chećko, 2025. "From Farms to Forests: An Exploration of Afforestation Efforts in Poland Under the Rural Development Programme (2007–2020)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1027-:d:1578205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1027/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1027/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yude Pan & Richard A. Birdsey & Oliver L. Phillips & Richard A. Houghton & Jingyun Fang & Pekka E. Kauppi & Heather Keith & Werner A. Kurz & Akihiko Ito & Simon L. Lewis & Gert-Jan Nabuurs & Anatoly S, 2024. "Author Correction: The enduring world forest carbon sink," Nature, Nature, vol. 632(8026), pages 7-7, August.
    2. Kuemmerle, Tobias & Levers, Christian & Erb, Karlheinz & Estel, Stephan & Jepsen, Martin R & Müller, Daniel & Plutzar, Christoph & Stürck, Julia & Verkerk, Pieter J & Verburg, Peter H & Reenberg, Anet, 2016. "Hotspots of land use change in Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14.
    3. Jasmina Behan & Kieran McQuinn & Maurice J. Roche, 2006. "Rural Land Use: Traditional Agriculture or Forestry?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 82(1), pages 112-123.
    4. Rafał Wyszomierski & Piotr Bórawski & Lisa Holden & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Tomasz Rokicki & Andrzej Parzonko, 2024. "The Trade of Woody Biomass in the Context of Environmental Economics in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-31, September.
    5. Yude Pan & Richard A. Birdsey & Oliver L. Phillips & Richard A. Houghton & Jingyun Fang & Pekka E. Kauppi & Heather Keith & Werner A. Kurz & Akihiko Ito & Simon L. Lewis & Gert-Jan Nabuurs & Anatoly S, 2024. "The enduring world forest carbon sink," Nature, Nature, vol. 631(8021), pages 563-569, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chao Yue & Mengyang Xu & Philippe Ciais & Shu Tao & Huizhong Shen & Jinfeng Chang & Wei Li & Lei Deng & Junhao He & Yi Leng & Yu Li & Jiaming Wang & Can Xu & Han Zhang & Pengyi Zhang & Liankai Zhang &, 2024. "Contributions of ecological restoration policies to China’s land carbon balance," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Renhui Zuo & Yan Ma & Ming Tang & Hao Luo & Junqin Li & Tao Liao & Yuanfang Gong & Shunfu Zhang & Jiyi Gong & Yin Yi, 2025. "Regional Carbon Storage Dynamics Driven by Tea Plantation Expansion: Insights from Meitan County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Francesca Pilotto & Ingolf Kühn & Rita Adrian & Renate Alber & Audrey Alignier & Christopher Andrews & Jaana Bäck & Luc Barbaro & Deborah Beaumont & Natalie Beenaerts & Sue Benham & David S. Boukal & , 2020. "Meta-analysis of multidecadal biodiversity trends in Europe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. González-García, Alberto & Palomo, Ignacio & González, José A. & López, César A. & Montes, Carlos, 2020. "Quantifying spatial supply-demand mismatches in ecosystem services provides insights for land-use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Glenk, Klaus & Schaafsma, Marije & Moxey, Andrew & Martin-Ortega, Julia & Hanley, Nick, 2014. "A framework for valuing spatially targeted peatland restoration," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 20-33.
    6. Tee, James & Scarpa, Riccardo & Marsh, Dan & Guthrie, Graeme, 2012. "Valuation of Carbon Forestry and the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme: A Real Options Approach Using the Binomial Tree Method," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 123665, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Andra-Cosmina Albulescu & Michael Manton & Daniela Larion & Per Angelstam, 2022. "The Winding Road towards Sustainable Forest Management in Romania, 1989–2022: A Case Study of Post-Communist Social–Ecological Transition," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-29, July.
    8. Dawid Kudas & Agnieszka Wnęk & Ľubica Hudecová & Robert Fencik, 2024. "Spatial Diversity Changes in Land Use and Land Cover Mix in Central European Capitals and Their Commuting Zones from 2006 to 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Szilárd Szentes & Andrea Kevi & Zsombor Wagenhoffer & Eszter Saláta-Falusi & Ferenc Pajor & József Berke & Ildikó Turcsányi-Járdi & Péter Penksza & Viola Kunos & Zoltán Kende & Károly Penksza, 2024. "Assessing the Impact of Grazing and Restoration Methods on Pannonian Grasslands," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Kovács András Donát & Hoyk Edit & Farkas Jenő Zsolt, 2017. "Homokhátság - a special rural area affected by aridification in the Carpathian basin, Hungary," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 29-50, March.
    11. Nizalov, Denys & Thornsbury, Suzanne & Loveridge, Scott & Woods, Mollie & Zadorozhna, Olha, 2016. "Security of property rights and transition in land use," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 76-91.
    12. Yin, Fang & Sun, Zhanli & You, Liangzhi & Müller, Daniel, 2018. "Increasing concentration of major crops in China from 1980 to 2011," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(5), pages 480-493.
    13. Jun Ma & Jinliang Wang & Jianpeng Zhang & Suling He & Lanfang Liu & Xuzheng Zhong, 2024. "The Impact of Land Use and Land Cover Changes on Ecosystem Services Value in Laos between 2000 and 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Pablo Acebes & Zuriñe Iglesias-González & Francisco J. Muñoz-Galvez, 2021. "Do Traditional Livestock Systems Fit into Contemporary Landscapes? Integrating Social Perceptions and Values on Landscape Change," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Dumortier, Jerome & Kauffman, Nathan & Hayes, Dermot J., 2017. "Production and spatial distribution of switchgrass and miscanthus in the United States under uncertainty and sunk cost," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 300-314.
    16. Sabrina Lai & Federica Leone & Corrado Zoppi, 2020. "Spatial Distribution of Surface Temperature and Land Cover: A Study Concerning Sardinia, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Stefanie Engel & Charles Palmer & Luca Taschini & Simon Urech, 2015. "Conservation Payments under Uncertainty," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 91(1), pages 36-56.
    18. Diekmann, Anton & Wolbert-Haverkamp, Matthias & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2014. "Die Bewertung der Umstellung einer einjährigen Ackerkultur auf den Anbau von Miscanthus – Eine Anwendung des Realoptionsansatzes," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260812, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    19. Amir Kutliyarov & Ivan Stafiychuk & Damir Kutliyarov & Rail Khisamov & Alfiya Lukmanova, 2024. "Russian experience of land reforms," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 613-629, June.
    20. Hyytiainen, Kari & Leppanen, J. & Pahkasalo, T., 2008. "Economic analysis of field afforestation and forest clearance for cultivation in Finland," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44178, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1027-:d:1578205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.