IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p628-d1567456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Arterial Lane Width Versus Speed and Crash Rates: A Comprehensive Study of Road Safety

Author

Listed:
  • Bahar Azin

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, 110 Central Campus Dr. Rm 1435, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)

  • Reid Ewing

    (Department of City and Metropolitan Planning, College of Architecture and Planning, University of Utah, 375 S 1530 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)

  • Wookjae Yang

    (Urban Policy and Administration, Incheon National University, 119 Academy-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea)

  • Noshin Siara Promy

    (STV Inc., 1600 Perimeter Park Dr., Suite 225, Morrisville, NC 27560, USA)

  • Hannaneh Abdollahzadeh Kalantari

    (Department of City and Metropolitan Planning, College of Architecture and Planning, University of Utah, 375 S 1530 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)

  • Nawshin Tabassum

    (Department of City and Metropolitan Planning, College of Architecture and Planning, University of Utah, 375 S 1530 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)

Abstract

Reducing vehicle lane widths has been proposed as an effective strategy to decrease vehicle speeds and enhance road safety. However, the safety benefits of narrower travel lanes remain a topic of debate due to mixed findings in the literature. This study examines the relationship between lane width, vehicle speed, and crash occurrence to comprehensively understand their impact on road safety and transportation planning. Using data from 320 urban arterial sections in Utah, the analysis reveals that narrower lane widths are associated with reduced vehicle speeds. For every additional foot of lane width, 85th and 95th percentile speeds increase by 1.012 mph and 1.088 mph, respectively. Furthermore, injury crash modeling indicates that a one-foot increase in lane width is associated with a 38.3% increase in the odds of an injury crash on a roadway section. These findings contribute to the growing evidence supporting the implementation of narrower lane widths as a strategy to improve road safety, foster multimodal infrastructure, and promote sustainable urban transportation systems. We recommend that UDOT adopt a minimum lane width of 10 or 11 feet for arterials in highly urbanized areas, such as downtowns and major activity centers.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahar Azin & Reid Ewing & Wookjae Yang & Noshin Siara Promy & Hannaneh Abdollahzadeh Kalantari & Nawshin Tabassum, 2025. "Urban Arterial Lane Width Versus Speed and Crash Rates: A Comprehensive Study of Road Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:628-:d:1567456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/628/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/628/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allen McDowell, 2003. "From the help desk: hurdle models," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 3(2), pages 178-184, June.
    2. Elżbieta MACIOSZEK & Agata KUREK, 2021. "Road Traffic Distribution On Public Holidays And Workdays On Selected Road Transport Network Elements," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 16(1), pages 127-138, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bray, Mark & Zhan, Shengli & Lykins, Chad & Wang, Dan & Kwo, Ora, 2014. "Differentiated demand for private supplementary tutoring: Patterns and implications in Hong Kong secondary education," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 24-37.
    2. Nikiforakis, Nikos, 2010. "Feedback, punishment and cooperation in public good experiments," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 689-702, March.
    3. Megha Mukim & Peter Nunnenkamp, 2012. "The Location Choices of Foreign Investors: A District-level Analysis in India," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(7), pages 886-918, July.
    4. Rozana Himaz, 2010. "Intrahousehold Allocation of Education Expenditure: The Case of Sri Lanka," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(2), pages 231-258, January.
    5. Christoph Engel, 2011. "Dictator games: a meta study," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 14(4), pages 583-610, November.
    6. Rees, Carter & Wallace, Danielle, 2014. "The myth of conformity: Adolescents and abstention from unhealthy drinking behaviors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 34-45.
    7. Jiang, Yuan & House, Lisa & Tejera, Christian & Percival, Susan S., 2015. "Consumption of Mushrooms: A double-hurdle Approach," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196902, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    8. Wesley Bertoli & Katiane S. Conceição & Marinho G. Andrade & Francisco Louzada, 2018. "On the zero-modified Poisson–Shanker regression model and its application to fetal deaths notification data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 807-836, June.
    9. Nisvan Erkal & Lata Gangadharan & Nikos Nikiforakis, 2011. "Relative Earnings and Giving in a Real-Effort Experiment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(7), pages 3330-3348, December.
    10. Riccardo Pedersini & Rosemarie Nagel & Marc Le Menestrel, 2019. "The Power of Requests in a Redistribution Game: An Experimental Study," Games, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Nikos Nikiforakis & Dirk Engelmann, 2008. "Feuds in the Laboratory? A Social Dilemma Experiment," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1058, The University of Melbourne.
    12. Egemen İPEK, 2019. "An Empirical Study on Alcohol Participation and Consumption Decision in Turkey," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 27(41).
    13. Anabela Botelho, 2013. "The impact of regulatory compliance behavior on hazardous waste generation in European private healthcare facilities," NIMA Working Papers 49, Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada (NIMA), Universidade do Minho.
    14. Mishra, Ashok K. & Williams, Robert P. & Detre, Joshua D., 2009. "Internet Access and Internet Purchasing Patterns of Farm Households," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Tan, Fangfang & Xiao, Erte, 2018. "Third-party punishment: Retribution or deterrence?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 34-46.
    16. Gangadharan, Lata & Harrison, Glenn W. & Leroux, Anke D., 2019. "Are risks over multiple attributes traded off? A case study of aid," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 166-198.
    17. Offerman, Theo & van der Veen, Ailko, 2015. "How to subsidize contributions to public goods: Does the frog jump out of the boiling water?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 96-108.
    18. Nikiforakis, Nikos, 2008. "Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-2), pages 91-112, February.
    19. R. Martínez-Espiñeira, 2007. "‘Adopt a Hypothetical Pup’: A Count Data Approach to the Valuation of Wildlife," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 37(2), pages 335-360, June.
    20. Seraina Rüegger & Heidrun Bohnet, 2018. "The Ethnicity of Refugees (ER): A new dataset for understanding flight patterns1," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(1), pages 65-88, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:628-:d:1567456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.