IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p434-d1562659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fintech and Corporate ESG Performance: An Empirical Analysis Based on the NEV Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Xinhao Huang

    (School of Economics and Management, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun 130012, China)

  • Di Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun 130012, China)

  • Meng Sun

    (Northeast Asia Research Center, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China)

Abstract

With the strategic background of accelerating the transformation of the low-carbon economy in China, how to better help the new energy automobile industry realize green and high-quality development under the goal of “dual-carbon” with the strengthening of science and technology has become one of the most important issues nowadays, and it is of great significance to explore the relationship between financial technology (fintech) and the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance of the new energy automobile (NEV) industry. Using panel data from NEV companies listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets between 2011 and 2022, this study applies text mining techniques to construct a fintech index and analyze the transmission mechanisms through which fintech influences ESG performance. The findings show that fintech directly improves ESG outcomes for NEV companies, a result that remains robust across a series of validation tests. The analysis reveals that fintech reduces financing constraints and enhances corporate environmental information disclosure, which in turn drives better ESG performance. Furthermore, the impact of fintech is particularly pronounced in state-owned enterprises, large-scale firms, and technologically advanced NEV companies, as evidenced by heterogeneity analysis. This study provides empirical insights into fintech’s role in advancing sustainable development in the NEV sector, offering guidance for policymakers and industry stakeholders aiming to align technological progress with environmental and social governance objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinhao Huang & Di Li & Meng Sun, 2025. "Fintech and Corporate ESG Performance: An Empirical Analysis Based on the NEV Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:434-:d:1562659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/434/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/434/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wen, Hui & Ho, Ken C. & Gao, Jijun & Yu, Li, 2022. "The fundamental effects of ESG disclosure quality in boosting the growth of ESG investing," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Erel, Isil & Liebersohn, Jack, 2022. "Can FinTech reduce disparities in access to finance? Evidence from the Paycheck Protection Program," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 90-118.
    3. Zhu, Yi & Lin, Yangyi & Tan, Yanyu & Liu, Bin & Wang, Hao, 2024. "The potential nexus between fintech and energy consumption: A new perspective on natural resource consumption," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Gaia Soana, Maria, 2024. "Does ESG contracting align or compete with stakeholder interests?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. Shi, Yu & Dong, Xiaohong & Zhang, Qiyuan & Zhou, Ze, 2024. "FinTech, urban entrepreneurial activity, and social security levels: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    6. Jin, Xuanxuan & Qi, Hanying & Huang, Xin, 2024. "Green financial regulation and corporate strategic ESG behavior: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Zabihollah Rezaee & Ling Tuo, 2019. "Are the Quantity and Quality of Sustainability Disclosures Associated with the Innate and Discretionary Earnings Quality?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 763-786, March.
    8. Yuying Gao & Shanyue Jin, 2022. "Corporate Nature, Financial Technology, and Corporate Innovation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Ding, Jinxiu & Li, Lingxue & Zhao, Jinsong, 2024. "How does fintech prompt corporations toward ESG sustainable development? Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    10. Mohan Zhang & Jing Tian & Hao Ni & Guangbao Fang, 2021. "Exploring Teacher Leadership and the Factors Contributing to It: An Empirical Study on Chinese Private Higher Education Institutions," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    11. Oğuzhan Bahadır & Sergen Akarsu, 2024. "Does Company Information Environment Affect ESG–Financial Performance Relationship? Evidence from European Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-26, March.
    12. Sabbaghi, Omid, 2022. "The impact of news on the volatility of ESG firms," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng Hu & Xuming Li & Nian Li & Yiying Wang & Derek D. Wang, 2024. "Peeking into Corporate Greenwashing through the Readability of ESG Disclosures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Fengxue Yin & Yanling Xiao & Rui Cao & Jianhua Zhang, 2023. "Impacts of ESG Disclosure on Corporate Carbon Performance: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in Heavy Pollution Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Zhu Yongjie, 2023. "Enterprise life cycle, financial technology and digital transformation of banks—Evidence from China," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 486-500, September.
    4. Tuo, Ling & Rezaee, Zabihollah & Gao, Lei, 2024. "Is there a tradeoff between management earnings forecasts and sustainability reporting?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    5. Yinglin Wang & Leqi Chen & Jiaxin Zhuang, 2024. "Research on ESG Investment Efficiency Regulation from the Perspective of Reciprocity and Evolutionary Game," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(3), pages 1665-1695, September.
    6. Hasan, Iftekhar & Li, Xiang & Takalo, Tuomas, 2023. "Technological innovation and the bank lending channel of monetary policy transmission," IWH Discussion Papers 14/2021, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH), revised 2023.
    7. Olayinka Oyekola & Sofia Johan & Rilwan Sakariyahu & Oluwatoyin Esther Dosumu & Shima Amini, 2023. "Political institutions, financial liberalisation, and access to finance: firm-level empirical evidence," Discussion Papers 2307, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    8. Weiwei Gao & Ting Cao & Zhen Huang, 2021. "Do outsiders listen to insiders? The role of government support in market reactions to earnings announcements," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 781-795, June.
    9. Khurram, Muhammad Usman & Chen, Lifeng & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul & Adu, Douglas A. & Lucey, Brian, 2024. "ESG disclosure and internal pay gap: Empirical evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 228-244.
    10. NUGRAHANI Tri Siwi & ARTANTO Dwi Ari, 2022. "Sustainability Reporting By Disclosing Economic, Social And Environmental Performance," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 17(2), pages 216-226, August.
    11. Dimitrios Koemtzopoulos & Georgia Zournatzidou & Konstantina Ragazou & Nikolaos Sariannidis, 2025. "Cryptocurrencies Transit to a Carbon Neutral Environment: From Fintech to Greentech Through Clean Energy and Eco-Efficiency Policies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Pierdomenico Duttilo & Stefano Antonio Gattone & Barbara Iannone, 2024. "Mixtures of generalized normal distributions and EGARCH models to analyse returns and volatility of ESG and traditional investments," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 108(4), pages 755-775, December.
    13. Oubani Ahmed El, 2024. "Quantile connectedness between social network sentiment and sustainability index volatility: Evidence from the Moroccan financial market," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 10(3), pages 163-196.
    14. Michael Dinerstein & Constantine Yannelis & Ching-Tse Chen, 2024. "Debt Moratoria: Evidence from Student Loan Forbearance," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 6(2), pages 196-213, June.
    15. Brett Barkley & Mark Schweitzer, 2023. "Credit Availability for Minority Business Owners in an Evolving Credit Environment," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 37(3), pages 230-242, August.
    16. Li, Chao & Keeley, Alexander Ryota & Takeda, Shutaro & Seki, Daikichi & Managi, Shunsuke, 2024. "Investor’s ESG Tendency Probed by Pre-trained Transformers," MPRA Paper 122756, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Oyekola, Olayinka & Odewunmi, Samuel, 2023. "The consequence of societal secrecy for the financial constraints faced by firms," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    18. Sun, Weizheng & Chen, Shuning & Jiao, Yuqing & Feng, Xu, 2024. "How does ESG constrain corporate earnings management? Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    19. Rehana Anwar & Jaleel A. Malik, 2020. "When Does Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Affect Investment Efficiency? A New Answer to an Old Question," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    20. Li, Ge & Cheng, Yuxiang, 2024. "Impact of environmental, social, and governance rating disagreement on real earnings management in Chinese listed companies," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:434-:d:1562659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.