IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2024i1p81-d1553765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Road to Inclusion: A Multifaceted Examination of Transportation Challenges Faced by Individuals with Disabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Güzin Akyıldız Alçura

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Transportation Division, Civil Engineering Faculty, Davutpaşa Campus, Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul 34220, Türkiye)

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) set forth by the United Nations aim to eradicate poverty, protect the environment, and promote global prosperity by 2030. Within this framework, Goal 11 targets explicitly sustainable cities and communities, emphasizing the need for accessible, safe, and sustainable transportation systems for all individuals, including those with disabilities. However, despite these aspirations, individuals with disabilities often face unique challenges and barriers in accessing transportation services. This study delves into the complexities of transportation accessibility for people with disabilities, aiming to understand their perceptions and expectations of service quality regarding reliability, tangibles, cleanliness, safety, comfort, personnel, and stops. In a comprehensive survey involving 302 individuals with disabilities, data were collected considering strata such as visual impairment, hearing impairment, chronic illness, and physical disability. In the study where cluster analysis was applied to examine the common and unique assessments of individuals with disabilities, both demographic characteristics and transportation habits were evaluated to determine the most effective inputs. The optimal results were obtained using disability level, car ownership, access to stops, and frequency of service use, while the inclusion of other sociodemographic variables (such as age and income) negatively affected the quality of the clustering process. By analyzing service quality independently for each cluster, the study unveils potential variations in how people with disabilities perceive and evaluate transportation services. The findings shed light on the distinct evaluation approaches employed by people with disabilities based on their characteristics, highlighting the need for tailored transportation planning and policy-making solutions. For example, in the overall assessment of individuals with disabilities, vehicle ergonomics was not highlighted as an area for improvement, but it emerged as the aspect with the least satisfaction among individuals with higher levels of disability. By addressing these nuances, policymakers and stakeholders can better understand and meet the diverse needs of people with disabilities, contributing to the creation of more inclusive and accessible transportation systems in line with the SDGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Güzin Akyıldız Alçura, 2024. "On the Road to Inclusion: A Multifaceted Examination of Transportation Challenges Faced by Individuals with Disabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-26, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:81-:d:1553765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/81/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/81/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grisé, Emily & Boisjoly, Geneviève & Maguire, Meadhbh & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2019. "Elevating access: Comparing accessibility to jobs by public transport for individuals with and without a physical disability," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 280-293.
    2. Wennberg, Hanna & Ståhl, Agneta & Hydén, Christer, 2009. "Implementing accessibility in municipal planning — planners’ view," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 2(2), pages 3-21.
    3. Vanessa Stjernborg, 2019. "Accessibility for All in Public Transport and the Overlooked (Social) Dimension—A Case Study of Stockholm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Darcy, Simon & Burke, Paul Francis, 2018. "On the road again: The barriers and benefits of automobility for people with disability," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 229-245.
    5. Kain Glensor, 2018. "Development of an Index of Transport-User Vulnerability, and its Application in Enschede, The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Antonio Páez & Steven Farber, 2012. "Participation and desire: leisure activities among Canadian adults with disabilities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 1055-1078, November.
    7. Mirela Gabriela Apostoaie & Mihaela Baritz & Angela Repanovici & Daniela Mariana Barbu & Alexandra Maria Lazăr & Gyury Bodi, 2023. "Visual Aid Systems from Smart City to Improve the Life of People with Low Vision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Singh, Harpreet & Kathuria, Ankit, 2023. "Heterogeneity in passenger satisfaction of bus rapid transit system among age and gender groups: A PLS-SEM Multi-group analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 27-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ralph, Kelcie & Morris, Eric A. & Kwon, Jaekyeong, 2022. "Disability, access to out-of-home activities, and subjective well-being," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 209-227.
    2. Baig, Farrukh & Zhang, Dong & Lee, Jaeyoung & Xu, Hongda, 2022. "Shaping inclusiveness of a transportation system: Factors affecting seat-yielding behavior of university students in public transportation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 79-94.
    3. Alimo, Philip Kofi & Agyeman, Stephen & Agen-Davis, Lawrencia & Hisseine, Mahamat Ali & Sarfo, Isaac, 2024. "Lived transportation barriers for persons with disabilities: Contextualizing the Ghana disability law through the lenses of Giddens' theory of structuration," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    4. Ana Gil Solá & Bertil Vilhelmson, 2018. "Negotiating Proximity in Sustainable Urban Planning: A Swedish Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Hui Zheng & Baohong He & Mingwei He & Jinghui Guo, 2022. "Impact of Urban Spatial Transformation on the Mobility of Commuters with Different Transportation Modes in China: Evidence from Kunming 2011–2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Márquez, Luis & Pineda, Laura X. & Poveda, Juan C., 2022. "Mobility-impaired people’s preferences for a specialized paratransit service as BRT’s feeder: The role of autonomy, relatedness, and competence," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 172-185.
    7. Oleg NIKIFOROV & Oleg YAROVIKOV & Eduard SAFRONOV & Kirill SAFRONOV & Sergey MOCHALIN, 2021. "Improving Urban Development Methods For The Development Of An Urban Transport System," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 16(3), pages 141-152, September.
    8. Shaila Jamal & Antonio Paez, 2024. "Well-being implications of immobility during COVID-19: evidence from a student sample in Bangladesh using the satisfaction with life scale," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 2019-2049, October.
    9. Liu, Luyu & Kar, Armita & Tokey, Ahmad Ilderim & Le, Huyen T.K. & Miller, Harvey J., 2023. "Disparities in public transit accessibility and usage by people with mobility disabilities: An evaluation using high-resolution transit data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Lucas, Karen & Bates, John & Moore, José & Carrasco, Juan Antonio, 2016. "Modelling the relationship between travel behaviours and social disadvantage," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 157-173.
    11. Chenggang Hua & Shu Cole, 2022. "Influence of Psychological Factors on Participation and Life Satisfaction in the Context of Travel and Tourism after Spinal Cord Injury," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Kwon, Kihyun & Akar, Gulsah, 2022. "People with disabilities and use of public transit: The role of neighborhood walkability," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    13. Zhang, Junyi & Hayashi, Yoshitsugu & Frank, Lawrence D., 2021. "COVID-19 and transport: Findings from a world-wide expert survey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 68-85.
    14. Freiberg, Germán & Giannotti, Mariana & Bittencourt, Taina A., 2024. "Are mass transit projects and public transport planning overlooking uneven distributional effects? Empirical evidence from Sao Paulo, Brazil," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    15. Hallgrimsdottir, Berglind & Wennberg, Hanna & Svensson, Helena & Ståhl, Agneta, 2016. "Implementation of accessibility policy in municipal transport planning – Progression and regression in Sweden between 2004 and 2014," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 196-205.
    16. Farber, Steven & Mifsud, Anika & Allen, Jeff & Widener, Michael J. & Newbold, K. Bruce & Moniruzzaman, Md, 2018. "Transportation barriers to Syrian newcomer participation and settlement in Durham Region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 181-192.
    17. Da Silva, Diego & Klumpenhouwer, Willem & Karner, Alex & Robinson, Mitchell & Liu, Rick & Shalaby, Amer, 2022. "Living on a fare: Modeling and quantifying the effects of fare budgets on transit access and equity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    18. Epting, Shane, 2021. "Ethical requirements for transport systems with automated buses," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    19. Adeel, Muhammad & Yeh, Anthony Gar-On & Zhang, Feng, 2016. "Transportation disadvantage and activity participation in the cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-12.
    20. Piotr Rosik & Sławomir Goliszek & Tomasz Komornicki & Patryk Duma, 2021. "Forecast of the Impact of Electric Car Battery Performance and Infrastructural and Demographic Changes on Cumulative Accessibility for the Five Most Populous Cities in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:81-:d:1553765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.