IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2024i1p50-d1553132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Inclusive Growth, Environmental Policy Incentives, Fintech and Globalization on Environmental Sustainability in G20 Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Minglong Xian

    (Department of Politics and International Relations, Sheffield University, Sheffield S1 4LZ, UK)

Abstract

This research investigates the effects of inclusive growth, environmental policy incentives, fintech innovations, and globalization on the environmental sustainability of G20 countries. In light of the growing global concern about carbon emissions from anthropogenic sources, which contribute to severe environmental degradation, the Paris Agreement aims to mitigate these impacts by controlling carbon emissions. This study explores how inclusive growth, fintech, and environmental policies interact to affect ecological footprints in G20 member countries, which represent some of the world’s most influential economies and policymakers. Specifically, inclusive growth is examined for its potential to reduce economic and social inequalities, which, if unmanaged, can exacerbate environmental degradation. In contrast, fintech is analyzed as a double-edged sword—its impact on sustainability depends on its influence on industries and economies, which may either exacerbate or alleviate environmental harm. Globalization’s role is scrutinized for its interactions with the economic, social, and ecological dimensions of sustainability. Our methodology employs advanced econometric models to analyze data from 1990 to 2023, focusing on the relationships between these variables and ecological footprints. Key findings suggest that while fintech can both increase and reduce environmental degradation depending on its application, environmental policy incentives are crucial for promoting sustainable practices and clean technology adoption. Inclusive growth can mitigate environmental harm by addressing inequalities, and globalization’s effects on sustainability depend largely on regulatory frameworks and corporate governance. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the complex interactions between economic growth models, technological advancements, and environmental policies. Its originality lies in its comprehensive analysis of the G20 economies, shedding light on how inclusive growth, fintech, and environmental policies shape environmental outcomes. The research offers key policy implications, stressing the need for stringent environmental regulations, the promotion of green technologies, and the diversification of economies to reduce reliance on resource rents. The findings emphasize the importance of balancing economic development with environmental sustainability to achieve long-term ecological stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Minglong Xian, 2024. "Impact of Inclusive Growth, Environmental Policy Incentives, Fintech and Globalization on Environmental Sustainability in G20 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-26, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:50-:d:1553132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/50/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/50/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng, Haiyan & Li, Yan, 2024. "The role of fintech, natural resources, environmental taxes and urbanization on environmental sustainability: Evidence from the novel panel data approaches," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Ni, Wenjie & Zhang, Xiaoming, 2023. "FinTech development and commercial bank efficiency in China," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    3. Böhringer, Christoph & Carbone, Jared C. & Rutherford, Thomas F., 2012. "Unilateral climate policy design: Efficiency and equity implications of alternative instruments to reduce carbon leakage," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(S2), pages 208-217.
    4. Acemoglu, Daron & Rafey, Will, 2023. "Mirage on the horizon: Geoengineering and carbon taxation without commitment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    5. Zhang, Yujin & Ye, Shujun & Liu, Jie & Du, Lihong, 2023. "Impact of the development of FinTech by commercial banks on bank credit risk," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    6. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Arshian Sharif & Hêriş Golpîra & Anil Kumar, 2019. "A green ideology in Asian emerging economies: From environmental policy and sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(6), pages 1063-1075, November.
    7. Chang, Yuan & Wu, Peng, 2024. "Influence of fiscal decentralization, fintech, and mineral resources on green productivity of G5 countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Lu, Yin & Tian, Tian & Ge, Chen, 2023. "Asymmetric effects of renewable energy, fintech development, natural resources, and environmental regulations on the climate change in the post-covid era," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    9. Junmei Zhang & Iftikhar Yasin, 2024. "Greening the BRICS: How Green Innovation Mitigates Ecological Footprints in Energy-Hungry Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nourallah, Mustafa & Öhman, Peter & Hamati, Samer, 2024. "Financial technology and financial capability: Study of the European Union," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    2. Nam Thanh Vu & Hung Quang Bui & Tuan Anh Pham & Duc Hong Vo, 2024. "Fintech development and environmental sustainability: Does income inequality matter?," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 350-369, June.
    3. Chen, Xiaojie & He, Guangwen & Li, Qian, 2024. "Can Fintech development improve the financial inclusion of village and township banks? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Feng, Haiyan & Li, Yan, 2024. "The role of fintech, natural resources, environmental taxes and urbanization on environmental sustainability: Evidence from the novel panel data approaches," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Khan, Habib Hussain & Kutan, Ali M. & Qureshi, Fiza, 2024. "Fintech integration: Driving efficiency in banking institutions across the developing nations," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    6. Li, Aijun & Du, Nan & Wei, Qian, 2014. "The cross-country implications of alternative climate policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 155-163.
    7. Faik Bilgili & Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente & Sevda Kuşkaya & Mohammed Alnour & Seyit Önderol & Mohammad Enamul Hoque, 2024. "Are research and development on energy efficiency and energy sources effective in the level of CO2 emissions? Fresh evidence from EU data," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 24183-24219, September.
    8. Meunier, Guy & Ponssard, Jean-Pierre & Quirion, Philippe, 2014. "Carbon leakage and capacity-based allocations: Is the EU right?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 262-279.
    9. Liu, Heng & Yan, Qiang, 2024. "Revenue-sharing contract in a three-tier online supply chain under EB platform financing," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    10. Xu, Xiaoying & Jin, Mei & Gong, Xinshu, 2024. "Local environmental goal constraint intensity and corporate ESG performance: An empirical observation based on China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    11. Böhringer, Christoph & Fischer, Carolyn & Rosendahl, Knut Einar, 2014. "Cost-effective unilateral climate policy design: Size matters," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 318-339.
    12. Christoph Böhringer & André Müller & Jan Schneider, 2015. "Carbon Tariffs Revisited," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(4), pages 629-672.
    13. Fan, Chenguang & Bae, Seongho & Liu, Yu, 2024. "Can FinTech transform corporate liquidity? Evidence from China," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(2).
    14. Yu, Rong & Li, Jianhong, 2024. "Does fintech influence sustainable development under natural resource constraints: insights from 270 Chinese cities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    15. Chien-Ming Wang & Tsung-Pao Wu, 2022. "Does tourism promote or reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from major tourist arrival countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3334-3355, March.
    16. Wang, Xiuli, 2023. "Exploring the role of resource industry dependence and green finance in green development efficiency in the context of post-Covid-19 period," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    17. Christoph Böhringer & Carolyn Fischer & Nicholas Rivers, 2023. "Intensity-Based Rebating of Emission Pricing Revenues," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(4), pages 1059-1089.
    18. Marc Audi & Amjad Ali, 2023. "Public Policy and Economic Misery Nexus: A Comparative Analysis of Developed and Developing World," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 13(3), pages 56-73, May.
    19. Feng, Xinzhen & Zhou, Dequn & Hussain, Tufail, 2024. "An investigation of fintech governance, natural resources and government stability on sustainability: Policy suggestions under the SDGs theme," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Parry, Ian, 2015. "Designing Fiscal Policy to Address the External Costs of Energy," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 8(1), pages 1-56, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    environmental sustainability; G20 countries; inclusive growth; environmental policy incentives; clean technology investment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:50-:d:1553132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.