IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2024i1p230-d1557919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remaining Life Prediction of Automatic Fare Collection Systems from the Perspective of Sustainable Development: A Sparse and Weak Feature Fault Data-Based Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Xiong

    (College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
    College of Air Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China)

  • Youchao Sun

    (College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China)

  • Zhihao Xu

    (SILC Business School, Shanghai University, Shanghai 201800, China)

  • Yongbing Wan

    (Shanghai Rail Transit Technology Research Center, Shanghai 201103, China)

  • Gang Yu

    (SILC Business School, Shanghai University, Shanghai 201800, China)

Abstract

The most effective way to solve urban traffic congestion in mega cities is to develop rail transit, which is also an important strategy for sustainable urban development. Improving the service performance of rail transit equipment is the key to ensuring the sustainable operation of urban rail transit. Automatic fare collection (AFC) is an indispensable system in urban rail transit. AFC directly serves passengers, and its condition directly affects the sustainability and safety of urban rail transit. This study proposes remaining useful life (RUL) prediction framework for AFC systems. Firstly, it proposes the quantification of AFC health state based on health degree, and proposes a health state assessment method based on digital analog fusion, which compensates for the shortcomings of single data-driven or model driven health methods. Secondly, it constructs a multi feature extraction method based on multi-layer LSTM, which can capture long-term temporal dependencies and multi-dimensional feature, overcoming the limitation of low model accuracy because of the weak data features. Then, the SSA-XGBoost model for AFC RUL prediction is proposed, which effectively performs global and local searches, reduces the possibility of overfitting, and improves the accuracy of the prediction model. Finally, we put it into practice of the AFC system of Shanghai Metro Line 10. The experiment shows that the proposed model has an MSE of 0.00111 and MAE of 0.02869 on the test set, while on the validation set, MSE is 0.00004 and MAE is 0.00659. These indicators are significantly better than other comparative models such as XGBoost, random forest regression, and linear regression. In addition, the SSA-XGBoost model also performs well on R-squared, further verifying its effectiveness in prediction accuracy and model fitting.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Xiong & Youchao Sun & Zhihao Xu & Yongbing Wan & Gang Yu, 2024. "Remaining Life Prediction of Automatic Fare Collection Systems from the Perspective of Sustainable Development: A Sparse and Weak Feature Fault Data-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-28, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:230-:d:1557919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/230/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/230/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    2. Mi, Jinhua & Li, Yan-Feng & Yang, Yuan-Jian & Peng, Weiwen & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2016. "Reliability assessment of complex electromechanical systems under epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-15.
    3. Arias Chao, Manuel & Kulkarni, Chetan & Goebel, Kai & Fink, Olga, 2022. "Fusing physics-based and deep learning models for prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Zhanhang & Zhou, Jian & Nassif, Hani & Coit, David & Bae, Jinwoo, 2023. "Fusing physics-inferred information from stochastic model with machine learning approaches for degradation prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    2. Kamariotis, Antonios & Tatsis, Konstantinos & Chatzi, Eleni & Goebel, Kai & Straub, Daniel, 2024. "A metric for assessing and optimizing data-driven prognostic algorithms for predictive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    3. Lee, Juseong & Mitici, Mihaela, 2023. "Deep reinforcement learning for predictive aircraft maintenance using probabilistic Remaining-Useful-Life prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    4. Zheng Liu & Xin Liu & Hong-Zhong Huang & Pingyu Zhu & Zhongwei Liang, 2022. "A new inherent reliability modeling and analysis method based on imprecise Dirichlet model for machine tool spindle," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 295-310, April.
    5. Jiang, Deyin & Chen, Tianyu & Xie, Juanzhang & Cui, Weimin & Song, Bifeng, 2023. "A mechanical system reliability degradation analysis and remaining life estimation method——With the example of an aircraft hatch lock mechanism," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    6. Zhang, Ao & Wang, Zhihua & Bao, Rui & Liu, Chengrui & Wu, Qiong & Cao, Shihao, 2023. "A novel failure time estimation method for degradation analysis based on general nonlinear Wiener processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    7. Ta, Yuntian & Li, Yanfeng & Cai, Wenan & Zhang, Qianqian & Wang, Zhijian & Dong, Lei & Du, Wenhua, 2023. "Adaptive staged remaining useful life prediction method based on multi-sensor and multi-feature fusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    8. Sun, Fuqiang & Fu, Fangyou & Liao, Haitao & Xu, Dan, 2020. "Analysis of multivariate dependent accelerated degradation data using a random-effect general Wiener process and D-vine Copula," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    9. Ying-Kui Gu & Chao-Jun Fan & Ling-Qiang Liang & Jun Zhang, 2022. "Reliability calculation method based on the Copula function for mechanical systems with dependent failure," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 99-116, April.
    10. Wang, Xiaolin & Liu, Bin & Zhao, Xiujie, 2021. "A performance-based warranty for products subject to competing hard and soft failures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    11. Li, Yuanfu & Chen, Yao & Hu, Zhenchao & Zhang, Huisheng, 2023. "Remaining useful life prediction of aero-engine enabled by fusing knowledge and deep learning models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    12. Bahareh Tajiani & Jørn Vatn, 2023. "Adaptive remaining useful life prediction framework with stochastic failure threshold for experimental bearings with different lifetimes under contaminated condition," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(5), pages 1756-1777, October.
    13. Yan-Feng Li & Hong-Zhong Huang & Jinhua Mi & Weiwen Peng & Xiaomeng Han, 2022. "Reliability analysis of multi-state systems with common cause failures based on Bayesian network and fuzzy probability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 195-209, April.
    14. Xiangang Cao & Pengfei Li & Song Ming, 2021. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction-Based Maintenance Decision Model for Stochastic Deterioration Equipment under Data-Driven," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Chang, Miaoxin & Huang, Xianzhen & Coolen, Frank PA & Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2023. "New reliability model for complex systems based on stochastic processes and survival signature," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1349-1364.
    16. Hughes, William & Zhang, Wei & Cerrai, Diego & Bagtzoglou, Amvrossios & Wanik, David & Anagnostou, Emmanouil, 2022. "A Hybrid Physics-Based and Data-Driven Model for Power Distribution System Infrastructure Hardening and Outage Simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    17. Liang, Qingzhu & Yang, Yinghao & Peng, Changhong, 2023. "A reliability model for systems subject to mutually dependent degradation processes and random shocks under dynamic environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    18. Kim, Sung Wook & Oh, Ki-Yong & Lee, Seungchul, 2022. "Novel informed deep learning-based prognostics framework for on-board health monitoring of lithium-ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    19. Yuan-Jian Yang & Ya-Lan Xiong & Xin-Yin Zhang & Gui-Hua Wang & Bihai Zou, 2022. "Reliability analysis of continuous emission monitoring system with common cause failure based on fuzzy FMECA and Bayesian networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 451-467, April.
    20. Pang, Zhenan & Li, Tianmei & Pei, Hong & Si, Xiaosheng, 2023. "A condition-based prognostic approach for age- and state-dependent partially observable nonlinear degrading system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:230-:d:1557919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.