IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2024i1p14-d1551557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and Analyzing the Spatiotemporal Travel Patterns of Bike Sharing: A Case Study of Citi Bike in New York

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng Wen

    (School of Geomatics and Urban Spatial Informatics, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Dongwei Tian

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Spatial Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, No. 3 Shangyuancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100044, China
    Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Spatial Information Engineering, Beijing 100045, China)

  • Naiming Wu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)

Abstract

As the urban transportation demand continues to grow, the effective management and optimization of bike-sharing systems are of significant importance for urban planning and transportation engineering. This study aims to identify the spatiotemporal distribution of the peak-period departures and arrivals of bike sharing within Manhattan, New York, and to analyze the community clustering patterns and their underlying rules. Additionally, a comparative analysis across multiple time periods was conducted to enhance the research’s practical value. This study utilized GPS trajectory data from the New York City bike-sharing system for 2023. After analyzing the travel patterns throughout the year, we selected August, the month with the highest usage, to study the origin-destination (OD) travel aggregation patterns using flow models and the theoretical constructs of travel networks, measuring and analyzing travel characteristics. Subsequently, community detection algorithms were applied to analyze the clustering patterns and relationships among various neighborhoods. The findings revealed that the use of bike sharing in New York exhibits an overall trend of increasing and then decreasing throughout the year, with significantly higher usage in the spring and summer compared to the fall and winter. Notably, August saw the highest usage levels, with hotspots primarily concentrated in the southwestern part of Manhattan, which is also the economic center of New York City. The OD aggregation patterns across the upper, middle, and lower parts of August show distinct variations. Through community analysis, several strongly associated neighborhood clusters were identified, which exhibited both aggregation and dispersion trends over time. In southern Manhattan, a community with high modularity emerged, showcasing strong interconnections among neighborhoods. These findings provide valuable insights into the usage patterns of bike sharing in New York and the factors influencing them, offering significant implications for the optimization of bike-sharing system operations and planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng Wen & Dongwei Tian & Naiming Wu, 2024. "Modeling and Analyzing the Spatiotemporal Travel Patterns of Bike Sharing: A Case Study of Citi Bike in New York," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:14-:d:1551557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/14/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/14/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, De & Ong, Ghim Ping, 2021. "Geo-fenced parking spaces identification for free-floating bicycle sharing system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 49-63.
    2. Faghih-Imani, Ahmadreza & Eluru, Naveen, 2016. "Incorporating the impact of spatio-temporal interactions on bicycle sharing system demand: A case study of New York CitiBike system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 218-227.
    3. Sunwoo Park & Hyejin Yoon & Chulmo Koo & Won Seok Lee, 2021. "Role of the Leisure Attributes of Shared Bicycles in Promoting Leisure Benefits and Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Elliot Fishman, 2016. "Bikeshare: A Review of Recent Literature," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 92-113, January.
    5. Sheng Wei & Lei Wang, 2020. "Examining the population flow network in China and its implications for epidemic control based on Baidu migration data," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Duan, Yimeng & Zhang, Shen & Yu, Zhuoran, 2021. "Applying Bayesian spatio-temporal models to demand analysis of shared bicycle," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Van Veghel, Daniel & Scott, Darren M., 2024. "Investigating the impacts of bike lanes on bike share ridership: A holistic approach and demonstration," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    2. Elżbieta Macioszek & Paulina Świerk & Agata Kurek, 2020. "The Bike-Sharing System as an Element of Enhancing Sustainable Mobility—A Case Study based on a City in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-29, April.
    3. Kumar Dey, Bibhas & Anowar, Sabreena & Eluru, Naveen, 2021. "A framework for estimating bikeshare origin destination flows using a multiple discrete continuous system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 119-133.
    4. Mix, Richard & Hurtubia, Ricardo & Raveau, Sebastián, 2022. "Optimal location of bike-sharing stations: A built environment and accessibility approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 126-142.
    5. Hua, Mingzhuang & Chen, Xuewu & Chen, Jingxu & Huang, Di & Cheng, Long, 2022. "Large-scale dockless bike sharing repositioning considering future usage and workload balance," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 605(C).
    6. Wang, Kailai & Akar, Gulsah, 2019. "Gender gap generators for bike share ridership: Evidence from Citi Bike system in New York City," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-9.
    7. Wang, Xudong & Cheng, Zhanhong & Trépanier, Martin & Sun, Lijun, 2021. "Modeling bike-sharing demand using a regression model with spatially varying coefficients," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Rodrigo Mora & Pablo Moran, 2020. "Public Bike Sharing Programs Under the Prism of Urban Planning Officials: The Case of Santiago de Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Guidon, Sergio & Reck, Daniel J. & Axhausen, Kay, 2020. "Expanding a(n) (electric) bicycle-sharing system to a new city: Prediction of demand with spatial regression and random forests," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    10. Xie, Xiao-Feng & Wang, Zunjing Jenipher, 2018. "Examining travel patterns and characteristics in a bikesharing network and implications for data-driven decision supports: Case study in the Washington DC area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 84-102.
    11. Coenegrachts, Elnert & Vanelslander, Thierry & Verhetsel, Ann & Beckers, Joris, 2024. "Analyzing shared mobility markets in Europe: A comparative analysis of shared mobility schemes across 311 European cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    12. Wang, Kailai & Akar, Gulsah & Chen, Yu-Jen, 2018. "Bike sharing differences among Millennials, Gen Xers, and Baby Boomers: Lessons learnt from New York City’s bike share," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 1-14.
    13. Wang, Kailai & Chen, Yu-Jen, 2020. "Joint analysis of the impacts of built environment on bikeshare station capacity and trip attractions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    14. Link, Christoph & Strasser, Christoph & Hinterreiter, Michael, 2020. "Free-floating bikesharing in Vienna – A user behaviour analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 168-182.
    15. Faghih-Imani, Ahmadreza & Anowar, Sabreena & Miller, Eric J. & Eluru, Naveen, 2017. "Hail a cab or ride a bike? A travel time comparison of taxi and bicycle-sharing systems in New York City," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 11-21.
    16. Mehzabin Tuli, Farzana & Mitra, Suman & Crews, Mariah B., 2021. "Factors influencing the usage of shared E-scooters in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 164-185.
    17. Ahmed Kheiri & Alina G. Dragomir & David Mueller & Joaquim Gromicho & Caroline Jagtenberg & Jelke J. Hoorn, 2019. "Tackling a VRP challenge to redistribute scarce equipment within time windows using metaheuristic algorithms," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(5), pages 561-595, December.
    18. Gu, Tianqi & Kim, Inhi & Currie, Graham, 2019. "To be or not to be dockless: Empirical analysis of dockless bikeshare development in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 122-147.
    19. Radzimski, Adam & Dzięcielski, Michał, 2021. "Exploring the relationship between bike-sharing and public transport in Poznań, Poland," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 189-202.
    20. Zheng, Wei & Wei, Sheng, 2024. "A ‘node-place-network-city’ framework to examine HSR station area development dynamics: Station typologies and development strategies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:14-:d:1551557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.