IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1398-d1334981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employee Acceptance of Digital Transformation: A Study in a Smart City Context

Author

Listed:
  • Ibrahim Mutambik

    (Department of Information Science, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 11451, Riyadh 11437, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdullah Almuqrin

    (Department of Information Science, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 11451, Riyadh 11437, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The notion of the smart city offers significant benefits to citizens and enterprises alike. To realize these benefits, however, the city’s organizations and working processes need to undergo a digital transformation (DT) which reshapes work practices and demands a new mindset from city employees. The readiness of these employees to accept such a DT has an effect on the extent to which the city’s residents and businesses benefit from being in a smart city context. This raises the question of which factors have the most influence on employees’ acceptance of DT—a question that has thus far received limited attention from researchers. This study introduces a model that examines various influencing factors, using data collected from a survey of 1180 employees in 10 smart cities in Saudi Arabia. The factors examined take a variety of forms, including external elements such as management provision for employees and process complexity, which can lead to resistance to change, as well as internal elements, such as perceived advantages and inertia. The findings of the study show that management support for employees and the perceived advantages of DT have a positive relationship with acceptance by employees, while process complexity and inertia have a negative relationship with employees’ acceptance. These findings contribute to the growing body of literature concerning DT acceptance in a smart city context and will provide organizations with insights on which to base strategies for encouraging employee adaptation to evolving digital landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibrahim Mutambik & Abdullah Almuqrin, 2024. "Employee Acceptance of Digital Transformation: A Study in a Smart City Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1398-:d:1334981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1398/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1398/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Renata Paola Dameri, 2017. "Smart City Definition, Goals and Performance," Progress in IS, in: Smart City Implementation, chapter 0, pages 1-22, Springer.
    2. Harris Breslow, 2021. "The smart city and the containment of informality: The case of Dubai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 471-486, February.
    3. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. AlNuaimi, Bader K. & Kumar Singh, Sanjay & Ren, Shuang & Budhwar, Pawan & Vorobyev, Dmitriy, 2022. "Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 636-648.
    5. Flavia Michelotto & Luiz Antonio Joia, 2023. "Unveiling the Smart City Concept: Perspectives from an Emerging Market via the Social Representation Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Hair, Joe F. & Howard, Matt C. & Nitzl, Christian, 2020. "Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 101-110.
    7. Samuelson, William & Zeckhauser, Richard, 1988. "Status Quo Bias in Decision Making," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 7-59, March.
    8. Songling Chang & Melanie Kay Smith, 2023. "Residents’ Quality of Life in Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Tobias Hahn & Frank Figge & Jonatan Pinkse & Lutz Preuss, 2018. "A Paradox Perspective on Corporate Sustainability: Descriptive, Instrumental, and Normative Aspects," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 235-248, March.
    10. Robert G. Hollands, 2008. "Will the real smart city please stand up?," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 303-320, December.
    11. André Hanelt & René Bohnsack & David Marz & Cláudia Antunes Marante, 2021. "A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1159-1197, July.
    12. Daniela NovÃ¡Ä ková & Tomáš PerÃ¡Ä ek & Ľubomíra Strážovská & Boris Mucha, 2020. "Financial crime in economic affairs: case study of the Slovak Republic," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 10(Special I), pages 142-163, October.
    13. Verhoef, Peter C. & Broekhuizen, Thijs & Bart, Yakov & Bhattacharya, Abhi & Qi Dong, John & Fabian, Nicolai & Haenlein, Michael, 2021. "Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 889-901.
    14. Fangyao Liu & Nicole Damen & Zhengxin Chen & Yong Shi & Sihai Guan & Daji Ergu, 2023. "Identifying Smart City Leaders and Followers with Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Luca Mora & Roberto Bolici & Mark Deakin, 2017. "The First Two Decades of Smart-City Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 3-27, January.
    16. Cristina Elena POPA (TACHE), 2021. "Ranking of Treatment Standards in International Investments," International Investment Law Journal, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 1(1), pages 79-87, February.
    17. Agnieszka SKÓRA & Mária SREBALOVà & Ingrida PAPà ČOVÃ, 2022. "Administrative judiciary is looking for a balance in a crisis to international contracts," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 12(1), pages 6-20, March.
    18. Seulki Lee, 2023. "The Acceptance Model of Smart City Service: Focused on Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Miltiadis D. Lytras & Anna Visvizi, 2018. "Who Uses Smart City Services and What to Make of It: Toward Interdisciplinary Smart Cities Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Ibrahim Mutambik & John Lee & Abdullah Almuqrin & Abdulrhman Alkhanifer & Mohammed Baihan, 2023. "Gulf Cooperation Council Countries and Urbanisation: Are Open Government Data Portals Helping?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    21. Yufei Fang & Zhiguang Shan, 2022. "How to Promote a Smart City Effectively? An Evaluation Model and Efficiency Analysis of Smart Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ibrahim Mutambik, 2024. "Digital Transformation as a Driver of Sustainability Performance—A Study from Freight and Logistics Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Zahoor, Nadia & Zopiatis, Anastasios & Adomako, Samuel & Lamprinakos, Grigorios, 2023. "The micro-foundations of digitally transforming SMEs: How digital literacy and technology interact with managerial attributes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Ibrahim Mutambik & Abdullah Almuqrin, 2024. "The Best of Both Worlds: How Financial Growth Can Engender Improved Sustainability for Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Changwei Pang & Qiong Wang, 2024. "How Digital Transformation Promotes Disruptive Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Entrepreneurial Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 7788-7818, June.
    6. Dahl, Andrew J. & Peltier, James W. & Swan, Eric L., 2023. "Anticipatory value-in-use in early-stage digital health service transformations: How consumers assess value propositions before and after abrupt, exogenous shocks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    7. Zhu, Xiumei & Li, Yue, 2023. "The use of data-driven insight in ambidextrous digital transformation: How do resource orchestration, organizational strategic decision-making, and organizational agility matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    8. Merín-Rodrigáñez, Joan & Dasí, Àngels & Alegre, Joaquín, 2024. "Digital transformation and firm performance in innovative SMEs: The mediating role of business model innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Antonio Fernández-Portillo & Nuria Ramos-Vecino & Adelaida Ramos-Mariño & Gabriel Cachón-Rodríguez, 2024. "How the digital business ecosystem affects stakeholder satisfaction: its impact on business performance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(9), pages 2643-2662, September.
    10. Fleury, Afonso & Fleury, Maria Tereza Leme & Oliveira, Luis & Leao, Pablo, 2024. "Going digital EMNEs: The role of digital maturity capability," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(4).
    11. Yang Li & Tianye Zhao, 2024. "How Digital Transformation Enables Corporate Sustainability: Based on the Internal and External Efficiency Improvement Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Vrontis, Demetris, 2022. "AI and digitalization in relationship management: Impact of adopting AI-embedded CRM system," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 437-450.
    13. Guo, Bin & Zhang, Jiale & Tan, Ziyan, 2024. "Firm digitalization as strategic response: An integrated model based on the awareness-motivation-capability (AMC) framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    14. Elia, Gianluca & Solazzo, Gianluca & Lerro, Antonio & Pigni, Federico & Tucci, Christopher L., 2024. "The digital transformation canvas: A conceptual framework for leading the digital transformation process," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 381-398.
    15. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    16. Jinqiu He & Huiwen Su, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Green Innovation of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure and International Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Rizvi, Syed Kumail Abbas & Rahat, Birjees & Naqvi, Bushra & Umar, Muhammad, 2024. "Revolutionizing finance: The synergy of fintech, digital adoption, and innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    18. Maria Vincenza Ciasullo & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi & Daniele Leone, 2020. "Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1167-1195, December.
    19. Ding, Jiantao & Yin, Yingkai & Kuang, Jinsong & Ding, Dezhi & Madsen, Dag.Øivind & Yang, Kunyu, 2024. "The impact of enterprise digital transformation on financial mismatch: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Ida Skubis & Radosław Wolniak & Wiesław Wes Grebski, 2024. "AI and Human-Centric Approach in Smart Cities Management: Case Studies from Silesian and Lesser Poland Voivodships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-26, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1398-:d:1334981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.