IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p11027-d1544931.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Zero-Waste City Policy in China: Based on Three-Dimensional Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Yifei Zhou

    (School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

Abstract

This paper proposes the PDDS model and constructs a three-dimensional analysis framework of policy objectives–policy tools–value chain in order to provide an in-depth analysis of 224 waste-free city policy texts released by China from 2019 to 2024. This study finds that China’s waste-free city policy objectives are macro-oriented, with specific objectives and milestones accounting for a relatively low proportion. Furthermore, there is a structural imbalance in policy tools, with environmental tools dominating and supply- and demand-based tools lagging behind. Additionally, support for each link in the value chain is uneven, with emphasis on the waste generation and disposal link, but the collection and regulation link is weak. In the three-dimensional analysis, China’s waste-free city policy exhibits a pattern of “overall goal leadership + environment-oriented policy tools + green industrial upgrading”. This study proposes a number of refinements to the policy objectives, improvements to the structure of policy instruments, enhanced synergies among the various segments of the value chain, and an increase in the aggregation effect of the policy objectives, instruments, and the evaluation chain. These changes are intended to promote the optimisation of waste-free city policies and the sustainable development of the environment in China and other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Yifei Zhou, 2024. "Analysis of Zero-Waste City Policy in China: Based on Three-Dimensional Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11027-:d:1544931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11027/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11027/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Leach & Ausilio Bauen & Nigel Lucas, 1997. "A Systems Approach to Materials Flow in Sustainable Cities: A Case Study of Paper," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 705-724.
    2. David Aadland & Arthur J. Caplan, 2006. "Curbside recycling: Waste resource or waste of resources?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(4), pages 855-874.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Suhaiza Zailani & Yasanur Kayikci & John G. Keogh, 2023. "Examining Knowledge Diffusion in the Circular Economy Domain: a Main Path Analysis," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 125-166, March.
    2. Ghalehkhondabi, Iman & Maihami, Reza & Ahmadi, Ehsan, 2020. "Optimal pricing and environmental improvement for a hazardous waste disposal supply chain with emission penalties," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Antonio Massarutto & Francesco Silvestri, 2015. "Free municipal waste trade as an incentive to recycling. A theoretical study," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(3), pages 89-107.
    4. Viscusi, W. Kip & Huber, Joel & Bell, Jason, 2023. "Changes in household recycling behavior: Evidence from panel data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    5. Marco A. Janssen & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh, 1999. "SIMBIOSES: Modelling Industrial Metabolism in a Multi-Regional Economic System," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 99-060/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    6. Burlakovs, Juris & Kriipsalu, Mait & Klavins, Maris & Bhatnagar, Amit & Vincevica-Gaile, Zane & Stenis, Jan & Jani, Yahya & Mykhaylenko, Valeriy & Denafas, Gintaras & Turkadze, Tsitsino & Hogland, Mar, 2017. "Paradigms on landfill mining: From dump site scavenging to ecosystem services revitalization," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 73-84.
    7. Berck, Peter & Sears, Molly & Taylor, Rebecca L.C. & Trachtman, Carly & Villas-Boas, Sofia B., 2024. "Reduce, reuse, redeem: Deposit-refund recycling programs in the presence of alternatives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    8. Gorm Kipperberg & Douglas Larson, 2012. "Heterogeneous Preferences for Community Recycling Programs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 53(4), pages 577-604, December.
    9. Lihini Silva & Rebecca L. C. Taylor, 2024. "If You Build It, Will They Compost? The Effects of Municipal Composting Services on Household Waste Disposal and Landfill Emissions," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(3), pages 761-789, March.
    10. Brian Chi-ang Lin & Siqi Zheng & Ankinée Kirakozian, 2016. "One Without The Other? Behavioural And Incentive Policies For Household Waste Management," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 526-551, July.
    11. Xuan Thi Dan Huynh & Tien Dung Khong & Adam Loch & Huynh Viet Khai, 2023. "Solid waste management program in developing countries: contingent valuation methodology versus choice experiment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12395-12417, November.
    12. Schill, Marie & Shaw, Deirdre, 2016. "Recycling today, sustainability tomorrow: Effects of psychological distance on behavioural practice," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 349-362.
    13. Dominique Ami & Frédéric Aprahamian & Olivier Chanel & Stéphane Luchini, 2011. "A Test of Cheap Talk in Different Hypothetical Contexts: The Case of Air Pollution," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 50(1), pages 111-130, September.
    14. Arthur Caplan & Douglas Jackson-Smith & Sandy Marquart-Pyatt, 2010. "Does 'free-sampling' enhance the value of public goods?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 335-339.
    15. van Beukering, Pieter J.H. & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2006. "Modelling and analysis of international recycling between developed and developing countries," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 1-26.
    16. Bohara, Alok K. & Caplan, Arthur J. & Grijalva, Therese, 2007. "The effect of experience and quantity-based pricing on the valuation of a curbside recycling program," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 433-443, December.
    17. Caplan, Arthur J. & Sims, Charles & Anderson, Elliot Jordan, 2014. "Measuring the environmental cost of hypocrisy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 124-135.
    18. Xiaoyue Liu & Jeongsoo Yu & Kazuaki Okubo & Masahiro Sato & Toshiaki Aoki, 2021. "Case Study on the Efficiency of Recycling Companies’ Waste Paper Collection Stations in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Ben Ewing & Erin Baker, 2009. "Development of a Green Building Decision Support Tool: A Collaborative Process," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 172-185, September.
    20. Chuanhui Liao & Dingtao Zhao & Shuang Zhang & Lanfang Chen, 2018. "Determinants and the Moderating Effect of Perceived Policy Effectiveness on Residents’ Separation Intention for Rural Household Solid Waste," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11027-:d:1544931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.