IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v62y2020ics0957178719303546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal pricing and environmental improvement for a hazardous waste disposal supply chain with emission penalties

Author

Listed:
  • Ghalehkhondabi, Iman
  • Maihami, Reza
  • Ahmadi, Ehsan

Abstract

Hazardous waste management has become a municipal problem, associated with industrial development and changing consumption patterns. We study the hazardous waste management system as a supply chain with a disposal facility and a contractor, which serves customers with demand sensitive to price and environment impact. The government intervenes with this supply chain by imposing emission penalties that make the waste disposal facility responsible for reducing disposal process emissions. The Stackelberg game and Nash equilibrium are used to model the decision-making sequence between the disposal facility and the contractor. We specify different scenarios to model the hazardous waste management supply chain. The goal of this research is to find the optimal disposal service price and level of environmental improvement to mitigate adverse impacts and maximize profits. The applicability of dual-channel service in the hazardous waste supply chain is also investigated. Our study shows that the supply chain obtains the highest profit if both the disposal facility and the contractor operate in a centralized model. Under some scenarios, profitability improves if the disposal facility becomes active in waste collection and transportation under a dual-channel supply-chain model. Demand sensitivity to price and environmental impacts can affect the adopted level of improvement by disposal facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghalehkhondabi, Iman & Maihami, Reza & Ahmadi, Ehsan, 2020. "Optimal pricing and environmental improvement for a hazardous waste disposal supply chain with emission penalties," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:62:y:2020:i:c:s0957178719303546
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2019.101001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178719303546
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2019.101001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Aadland & Arthur J. Caplan, 2006. "Curbside recycling: Waste resource or waste of resources?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(4), pages 855-874.
    2. Zaneta Stasiskiene & Jurgita Gaiziuniene & Sigita Zidoniene, 2011. "Assessing the Sustainability of the Lithuanian Hazardous Waste Management System," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 15(2), pages 268-283, April.
    3. Kothari, Richa & Tyagi, V.V. & Pathak, Ashish, 2010. "Waste-to-energy: A way from renewable energy sources to sustainable development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3164-3170, December.
    4. Cai, Gangshu (George) & Zhang, Zhe George & Zhang, Michael, 2009. "Game theoretical perspectives on dual-channel supply chain competition with price discounts and pricing schemes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 80-96, January.
    5. Samanlioglu, Funda, 2013. "A multi-objective mathematical model for the industrial hazardous waste location-routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(2), pages 332-340.
    6. Hu, Tung-Lai & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Huang, Kuan-Hsiung, 2002. "A reverse logistics cost minimization model for the treatment of hazardous wastes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 457-473, November.
    7. Rabbani, M. & Heidari, R. & Yazdanparast, R., 2019. "A stochastic multi-period industrial hazardous waste location-routing problem: Integrating NSGA-II and Monte Carlo simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 945-961.
    8. Court, Christa D. & Munday, Max & Roberts, Annette & Turner, Karen, 2015. "Can hazardous waste supply chain ‘hotspots’ be identified using an input–output framework?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 177-187.
    9. Li, Bo & Hou, Peng-Wen & Chen, Ping & Li, Qing-Hua, 2016. "Pricing strategy and coordination in a dual channel supply chain with a risk-averse retailer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 154-168.
    10. Nathiya Tanthachoon & Chart Chiemchaisri & Wilai Chiemchaisri, 2007. "Utilisation of Municipal Solid Waste Compost as landfill cover soil for reducing greenhouse gas emission," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3/4), pages 286-297.
    11. Hafezalkotob, Ashkan, 2017. "Competition, cooperation, and coopetition of green supply chains under regulations on energy saving levels," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 228-250.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ukrit Suksanguan & Somsak Siwadamrongpong & Thanapong Champahom & Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Tassana Boonyoo & Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, 2022. "Structural Equation Model of Factors Influencing the Selection of Industrial Waste Disposal Service in Cement Kilns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Toniolo, Sara & Pieretto, Chiara & Camana, Daniela, 2023. "A lifecycle-based indicator to support residual solid waste flow planning at the regional level," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Shin Hee Baek & Jong Soo Kim, 2020. "Efficient Algorithms for a Large-Scale Supplier Selection and Order Allocation Problem Considering Carbon Emissions and Quantity Discounts," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Li, Ye & Yang, Tianjian & Zhang, Yu, 2022. "Evolutionary game theory-based system dynamics modeling for community solid waste classification in China," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Rezayat, Mohammad Reza & Yaghoubi, Saeed & Fander, Atieh, 2021. "The impact of government intervention in competitive electronic closed-loop supply chain to support internal industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    6. Victor Hugo Souza De Abreu & Mariane Gonzalez Da Costa & Valeria Xavier Da Costa & Tassia Faria De Assis & Andrea Souza Santos & Marcio de Almeida D’Agosto, 2022. "The Role of the Circular Economy in Road Transport to Mitigate Climate Change and Reduce Resource Depletion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-26, July.
    7. Ngoc Bao Tu Nguyen & Gu-Hong Lin & Thanh-Tuan Dang, 2021. "A Two Phase Integrated Fuzzy Decision-Making Framework for Green Supplier Selection in the Coffee Bean Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-22, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chunlin Xin & Jie Wang & Ziping Wang & Chia-Huei Wu & Muhammad Nawaz & Sang-Bing Tsai, 2022. "Reverse logistics research of municipal hazardous waste: a literature review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1495-1531, February.
    2. Wang, Juyoung & Cevik, Mucahit & Amin, Saman Hassanzadeh & Parsaee, Amir Ali, 2021. "Mixed-integer linear programming models for the paint waste management problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    3. Chen Wei & Sobhan Asian & Gurdal Ertek & Zhi-Hua Hu, 2020. "Location-based pricing and channel selection in a supply chain: a case study from the food retail industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 959-984, August.
    4. Li, Mengmeng & Mizuno, Shinji, 2022. "Dynamic pricing and inventory management of a dual-channel supply chain under different power structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 273-285.
    5. Haoqing Wang & Wen Yi & Yannick Liu, 2022. "Optimal Route Design for Construction Waste Transportation Systems: Mathematical Models and Solution Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Wu, Weitiao & Ma, Jian & Liu, Ronghui & Jin, Wenzhou, 2022. "Multi-class hazmat distribution network design with inventory and superimposed risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Asl-Najafi, Javad & Yaghoubi, Saeed & Zand, Fatemeh, 2021. "Dual-channel supply chain coordination considering targeted capacity allocation under uncertainty," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 566-585.
    8. Syed Asif Raza, 2022. "A bibliometric analysis of pricing models in supply chain," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 228-251, April.
    9. M. Tadaros & A. Migdalas, 2022. "Bi- and multi-objective location routing problems: classification and literature review," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4641-4683, November.
    10. Misagh Rahbari & Alireza Arshadi Khamseh & Yaser Sadati-Keneti & Mohammad Javad Jafari, 2022. "A risk-based green location-inventory-routing problem for hazardous materials: NSGA II, MOSA, and multi-objective black widow optimization," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2804-2840, February.
    11. Fumin Deng & Yanjie Li & Huirong Lin & Jinrui Miao & Xuedong Liang, 2020. "A BWM-TOPSIS Hazardous Waste Inventory Safety Risk Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Lijing Zhu & Xiaohang Ren & Chulung Lee & Yumeng Zhang, 2017. "Coordination Contracts in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain with a Risk-Averse Retailer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Shao, Xiaofeng, 2021. "Omnichannel retail move in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 936-950.
    14. Hao Yu & Wei Deng Solvang, 2016. "An Improved Multi-Objective Programming with Augmented ε -Constraint Method for Hazardous Waste Location-Routing Problems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Rufeng Wang & Xiongwei Zhou & Bo Li, 2022. "Pricing strategy of dual-channel supply chain with a risk-averse retailer considering consumers’ channel preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(1), pages 305-324, February.
    16. Hao Yu & Wei Deng Solvang, 2017. "A multi-objective location-allocation optimization for sustainable management of municipal solid waste," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 289-308, September.
    17. Li, Jin & Yi, Liao & Shi, Victor & Chen, Xiding, 2021. "Supplier encroachment strategy in the presence of retail strategic inventory: Centralization or decentralization?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    18. Tahirov, Nail & Glock, Christoph H., 2022. "Manufacturer encroachment and channel conflicts: A systematic review of the literature," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 403-426.
    19. Chen, Xi & Zhang, Hui & Zhang, Michael & Chen, Jing, 2017. "Optimal decisions in a retailer Stackelberg supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 260-270.
    20. Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Jula, Payman & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza, 2017. "Design of a reliable multi-modal multi-commodity model for hazardous materials transportation under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 792-809.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:62:y:2020:i:c:s0957178719303546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.