IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p10839-d1541485.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Changes and Driving Force of Ecosystem Services Values Under Land Use/Land Cover Scenarios in Nanning, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jinlong Hu

    (College of Tourism & Landscape Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
    Institute of Guangxi Tourism Industry, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Zhenhong Bin

    (College of Tourism & Landscape Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Tingting Huang

    (College of Tourism & Landscape Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Yingxue Wang

    (College of Tourism & Landscape Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
    Institute of Guangxi Tourism Industry, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Yaming Fan

    (College of Tourism & Landscape Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
    Institute of Guangxi Tourism Industry, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of the spatial and temporal patterns of changes in ecosystem services, along with their driving factors, is crucial for managing ecosystems effectively and ensuring sustainable development in the area. Intense human activities and rapid urbanization have led to frequent land use/cover changes. Nanning, as a rapidly developing city, has received increasing attention for its ecosystem services. This research assesses the valuation of ecosystem services by employing the equivalent factor approach, utilizing land use data from Nanning City spanning the period from 2000 to 2020. It analyzes the spatial and temporal dynamics of these services and identifies key drivers through the application of a GeoDetector model. The results show the following: (1) Between 2000 and 2020, forests were the predominant ecosystem in Nanning City. During this period, significant land type conversions occurred, with the largest outflow from arable land and the largest inflow to construction land. (2) Over the 20 years, the aggregate value of ecosystem services (ESV) in Nanning exhibited a declining trend, culminating in a net reduction of USD 1056.8 million. Forest land ESVs constituted the largest proportion of the total value, exceeding 59%. Among the individual ESVs, hydrological regulation and climate regulation were the predominant services, collectively accounting for over 48% of the total value, with hydrological regulation contributing 20.7% and climate regulation 27.7%. (3) The ESVs in Nanning City exhibit pronounced spatial differentiation, with higher values concentrated in the central regions and lower values in peripheral zones. Notably, the high-value zones are experiencing a reduction in size, while the low-value zones are progressively expanding. (4) The findings from the GeoDetector analysis indicate that soil organic matter, urbanization rate, annual sunshine, financial expenditure, and population density are the primary determinants affecting ESV. Furthermore, the explanatory power of these influencing factors is substantially increased following interactive detection. This research provides a scientific basis for developing land management strategies and policies in Nanning City and holds substantial significance for advancing sustainable regional development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinlong Hu & Zhenhong Bin & Tingting Huang & Yingxue Wang & Yaming Fan, 2024. "Dynamic Changes and Driving Force of Ecosystem Services Values Under Land Use/Land Cover Scenarios in Nanning, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10839-:d:1541485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10839/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10839/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gashaw, Temesgen & Tulu, Taffa & Argaw, Mekuria & Worqlul, Abeyou W. & Tolessa, Terefe & Kindu, Mengistie, 2018. "Estimating the impacts of land use/land cover changes on Ecosystem Service Values: The case of the Andassa watershed in the Upper Blue Nile basin of Ethiopia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PA), pages 219-228.
    2. Tailong Shi & Hao Xu & Xuefeng Bai, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Evaluation and Driving Factor Screening for Regulating and Supporting Ecosystem Service Values in Suzhou–Wuxi–Changzhou Metropolitan Area’s Green Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, August.
    3. Yongge Li & Wei Liu & Qi Feng & Meng Zhu & Jutao Zhang & Linshan Yang & Xinwei Yin, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Driving Factors of Ecosystem Services Value in the Hexi Regions, Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Hui Li & Yilin Huang & Yilu Zhou & Shuntao Wang & Wanqi Guo & Yan Liu & Junzhi Wang & Qing Xu & Xiaokang Zhou & Kexin Yi & Qingchun Hou & Lixia Liao & Wei Lin, 2023. "Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Ecosystem Service Values and Topography-Driven Effects Based on Land Use Change: A Case Study of the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Sutton, Paul C. & Anderson, Sharolyn J. & Costanza, Robert & Kubiszewski, Ida, 2016. "The ecological economics of land degradation: Impacts on ecosystem service values," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 182-192.
    6. Yongjun Du & Xiaolong Li & Xinlin He & Xiaoqian Li & Guang Yang & Dongbo Li & Wenhe Xu & Xiang Qiao & Chen Li & Lu Sui, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Simulation and Trade-Off Analysis of Ecological Service Value in the Manas River Basin Based on Land Use Optimization in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-31, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muluberhan Biedemariam & Emiru Birhane & Biadgilgn Demissie & Tewodros Tadesse & Girmay Gebresamuel & Solomon Habtu, 2022. "Ecosystem Service Values as Related to Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Ethiopia: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Henghui Xi & Wanglai Cui & Li Cai & Mengyuan Chen & Chenglei Xu, 2021. "Evaluation and Prediction of Ecosystem Service Value in the Zhoushan Islands Based on LUCC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Shuming Ma & Jie Huang & Yingying Chai, 2021. "Proposing a GEE-Based Spatiotemporally Adjusted Value Transfer Method to Assess Land-Use Changes and Their Impacts on Ecosystem Service Values in the Shenyang Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Chengjin He & Huaiyong Shao & Wei Xian, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Variation and Driving Forces Analysis of Eco-System Service Values: A Case Study of Sichuan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Xiaofan Ma & Haifeng Zhang, 2022. "Variations in the Value and Trade-Offs/Synergies of Ecosystem Services on Topographic Gradients in Qinghai Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Fenta, Ayele Almaw & Tsunekawa, Atsushi & Haregeweyn, Nigussie & Tsubo, Mitsuru & Yasuda, Hiroshi & Shimizu, Katsuyuki & Kawai, Takayuki & Ebabu, Kindiye & Berihun, Mulatu Liyew & Sultan, Dagnenet & B, 2020. "Cropland expansion outweighs the monetary effect of declining natural vegetation on ecosystem services in sub-Saharan Africa," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    7. Chaoxu Luan & Renzhi Liu, 2022. "A Comparative Study of Various Land Use and Land Cover Change Models to Predict Ecosystem Service Value," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Liao, Chuan & Jung, Suhyun & Brown, Daniel G. & Agrawal, Arun, 2024. "Does land tenure change accelerate deforestation? A matching-based four-country comparison," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    9. Merica Slišković & Katja Božić & Jelena Žanić Mikuličić & Ines Kolanović, 2024. "Addressing the Significance of the Union List with a Focus on Marine Invasive Alien Species Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-25, October.
    10. Lingge Zhang & Ningke Hu, 2021. "Spatial Variation and Terrain Gradient Effect of Ecosystem Services in Heihe River Basin over the Past 20 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-26, October.
    11. Ling Cheng & Haiyang Cui & Tian Liang & Dan Huang & Yuanxia Su & Zhiyong Zhang & Chuanhao Wen, 2023. "Study on the Trade-Off Synergy Relationship of “Production-Living-Ecological” Functions in Chinese Counties: A Case Study of Chongqing Municipality," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, May.
    12. Mohamed A. M. Abd Elbasit & Jasper Knight & Gang Liu & Majed M. Abu-Zreig & Rashid Hasaan, 2021. "Valuation of Ecosystem Services in South Africa, 2001–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Zhang, Yanjie & Pan, Ying & Li, Meng & Wang, Zhipeng & Wu, Junxi & Zhang, Xianzhou & Cao, Yanan, 2021. "Impacts of human appropriation of net primary production on ecosystem regulating services in Tibet," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    14. Fangfang Xun & Yecui Hu & Ling Lv & Jinhui Tong, 2017. "Farmers’ Awareness of Ecosystem Services and the Associated Policy Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    15. Zhiwei Deng & Bin Quan, 2022. "Intensity Characteristics and Multi-Scenario Projection of Land Use and Land Cover Change in Hengyang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Morgan, Edward A. & Buckwell, Andrew & Guidi, Caterina & Garcia, Beatriz & Rimmer, Lawrence & Cadman, Tim & Mackey, Brendan, 2022. "Capturing multiple forest ecosystem services for just benefit sharing: The Basket of Benefits Approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    17. Jiayi Zhou & Kangning Xiong & Qi Wang & Jiuhan Tang & Li Lin, 2022. "A Review of Ecological Assets and Ecological Products Supply: Implications for the Karst Rocky Desertification Control," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Yizhu Chen & Nuanyin Xu & Qianru Yu & Luo Guo, 2020. "Ecosystem Service Response to Human Disturbance in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: A Case of Western Hunan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
    19. Kangkang Gu & Luyao Ma & Jian Xu & Haoran Yu & Xinmu Zhang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Water Conservation Service in Jiangxi Province from 2001 to 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    20. Purushothaman Chirakkuzhyil Abhilash, 2021. "Restoring the Unrestored: Strategies for Restoring Global Land during the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (UN-DER)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10839-:d:1541485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.