IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10732-d1538522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unpacking the Relationship Between Empowerment Leadership and Electricity Worker’s Unsafe Behavior: A Multi-Moderated Mediation Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Arhim

    (Department of Business Administration, Institute of Graduate Research and Studies, University of Mediterranean Karpasia, TRNC, 33010 Mersin, Turkey)

  • Ahmad Alzubi

    (Department of Business Administration, Institute of Graduate Research and Studies, University of Mediterranean Karpasia, TRNC, 33010 Mersin, Turkey)

  • Kolawole Iyiola

    (Department of Business Administration, Institute of Graduate Research and Studies, University of Mediterranean Karpasia, TRNC, 33010 Mersin, Turkey)

  • Faith Umene Banje

    (Department of Business Administration, Institute of Graduate Research and Studies, University of Mediterranean Karpasia, TRNC, 33010 Mersin, Turkey)

Abstract

Ensuring workplace safety in high-risk sectors is critical to achieving sustainable productivity and occupational health, particularly in industries prone to unsafe practices. Drawing on social exchange theory (SET), this study examines the impact of empowerment leadership (EL) on electricity workers’ unsafe behaviors (EWUBs) in Jordan, focusing on the mediating roles of safety motivation (SM) and work engagement (WE), as well as the moderating role of the error management climate (EMC). A quantitative approach was employed, collecting data from 409 electricity workers across various regions of Jordan. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) employing SmartPLS 4 to assess the relationships of these variables and AMOS 24.0 to compute the study measurement model’s internal consistency and construct validity. The results demonstrate that empowerment leadership significantly reduces electricity workers’ unsafe behaviors through increased safety motivation and work engagement. Furthermore, the error management climate moderates the relationship between empowerment leadership and work engagement (Estimate = 0.238, t = 7.783, <0.001) is stronger when the error management climate is high and weaker but also insignificant when the error management climate is low (Estimate = 0.045, t = 1.015, >0.05). The research highlights the crucial role of empowerment leadership in promoting safety motivation and work engagement, which (Estimate = 0.238, t = 7.783, <0.001) is stronger and essential for minimizing unsafe behavior in high-risk industries like electricity. The findings highlight the pivotal role of shaping employees’ unsafe behavior and offers practical implications for policymakers and institutions aiming to promote employees’ safety behavior. Future studies also emphasize fostering an error management climate to reinforce these effects and organizations should focus on leadership development and creating a supportive error management climate to maximize safety outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Arhim & Ahmad Alzubi & Kolawole Iyiola & Faith Umene Banje, 2024. "Unpacking the Relationship Between Empowerment Leadership and Electricity Worker’s Unsafe Behavior: A Multi-Moderated Mediation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10732-:d:1538522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10732/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10732/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shaker Salem Abuzawida & Ahmad Bassam Alzubi & Kolawole Iyiola, 2023. "Sustainable Supply Chain Practices: An Empirical Investigation from the Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Tariq Aboalhool & Ahmad Alzubi & Kolawole Iyiola, 2024. "Humane Entrepreneurship in the Circular Economy: The Role of Green Market Orientation and Green Technology Turbulence for Sustainable Corporate Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Joyce Rupert & Astrid C. Homan & Karen A. Jehn & Robert Jan Blomme, 2019. "Diversity Composition and Team Learning: The Moderating Role of Error Culture," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 695-722, August.
    4. Dong Ju & Xin Qin & Minya Xu & Marco S. DiRenzo, 2016. "Boundary conditions of the emotional exhaustion-unsafe behavior link: The dark side of group norms and personal control," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 113-140, March.
    5. Clayton M. Christensen & Rory McDonald & Elizabeth J. Altman & Jonathan E. Palmer, 2018. "Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1043-1078, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    2. Angélica Pigola & Priscila Rezende Costa, 2022. "In search of understanding about knowledge and learning on innovation performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 3995-4022, July.
    3. Blume, Maximilian & Oberländer, Anna Maria & Röglinger, Maximilian & Rosemann, Michael & Wyrtki, Katrin, 2020. "Ex ante assessment of disruptive threats: Identifying relevant threats before one is disrupted," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Aurel Burciu & Rozalia Kicsi & Simona Buta & Mihaela State & Iulia Burlac & Denisa Alexandra Chifan & Beatrice Ipsalat, 2023. "The Study of the Relationship among GCI, GII, Disruptive Technology, and Social Innovations in MNCs: How Do We Evaluate Financial Innovations Made by Firms? A Preliminary Inquiry," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-42, August.
    5. Pinar Ozcan & Douglas Hannah, 2020. "Social Origins of Great Strategies Advertising Suppliers to Realize Disruptive Social Media Technology," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 193-217, September.
    6. Qingfeng Meng & Wenyao Liu & Zhen Li & Xin Hu, 2021. "Influencing Factors, Mechanism and Prevention of Construction Workers’ Unsafe Behaviors: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Iizuka, Michiko & Hane, Gerald, 2021. "Transformation towards sustainable development goals: Role of innovation ecosystems for inclusive, disruptive advances in five Asian case studies," MERIT Working Papers 2021-001, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    8. Langley, Paul & Rieple, Alison, 2021. "Incumbents’ capabilities to win in a digitised world: The case of the fashion industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Etienne Montaigne & Alfredo Coelho & Samson Zadmehran, 2021. "A comprehensive economic examination and prospects on innovation in new grapevine varieties dealing with global warming and fungal diseases," Post-Print hal-03461901, HAL.
    10. Kodama, Mitsuru & Hashimoto, Keisuke, 2024. "Research on high-end disruptive innovations - Analysis and insights from the video conferencing systems market," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    11. Kristina Stoiber & Kurt Matzler & Julia Hautz, 2023. "Ambidextrous structures paving the way for disruptive business models: a conceptual framework," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1439-1485, May.
    12. Sorin M. S. Krammer & Peter Dahlin & Jonathan P. Doh & Kristina Potočnik, 2024. "Happy Diamond Anniversary JMS! A Decade Analysis of the Journal of Management Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1654-1682, June.
    13. Changwei Pang & Qiong Wang, 2024. "How Digital Transformation Promotes Disruptive Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Entrepreneurial Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 7788-7818, June.
    14. Lewandowska Małgorzata Stefania & Weresa Marzenna Anna & Rószkiewicz Małgorzata, 2022. "Evaluating the impact of public financial support on innovation activities of European Union enterprises: Additionality approach," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 58(3), pages 248-266, September.
    15. Croce, Annalisa & Toschi, Laura & Ughetto, Elisa & Zanni, Sara, 2024. "Cleantech and policy framework in Europe: A machine learning approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    16. Brougham, David & Haar, Jarrod, 2020. "Technological disruption and employment: The influence on job insecurity and turnover intentions: A multi-country study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Soltanzadeh, Javad & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Khosroshahi, Elnaz Mesma & Bouguerra, Abderaouf, 2024. "Commercializing Covid-19 diagnostic technologies: A review of challenges, success factors, and insights from the profiting from innovation framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    18. Elizaveta Fainshtein & Valentina Chkoniya & Mariantonietta Fiore & Elena Serova, 2024. "An innovation potential and organizational performance: an integrative role of company’s dynamic capabilities," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Claudy, Marius C. & Parkinson, Mary & Aquino, Karl, 2024. "Why should innovators care about morality? Political ideology, moral foundations, and the acceptance of technological innovations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    20. Khaled Tekala & Sarvnaz Baradarani & Ahmad Alzubi & Ayşen Berberoğlu, 2024. "Green Entrepreneurship for Business Sustainability: Do Environmental Dynamism and Green Structural Capital Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10732-:d:1538522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.