IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10314-d1529063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Mine Waste to Construction Materials: A Bibliometric Analysis of Mining Waste Recovery and Tailing Utilization in Construction

Author

Listed:
  • Vicente Zetola

    (Construction Management Department, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta 1270709, Chile)

  • Brian F. Keith

    (Department of Computing & Systems Engineering, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta 1270709, Chile)

  • Elizabeth J. Lam

    (Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta 1270709, Chile)

  • Ítalo L. Montofré

    (Mining Business School, ENM, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta 1270709, Chile
    Mining and Metallurgical Engineering Department, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta 1270709, Chile)

  • Rodrigo J. Rojas

    (Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta 1270709, Chile)

  • Juan Marín

    (Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta 1270709, Chile)

  • Mathias Becerra

    (Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta 1270709, Chile)

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive scientometric analysis of mining waste valorization, focusing on tailings utilization in construction materials from 2010 to 2024. Through examination of 1096 Web of Science publications and utilizing CiteSpace mapping and network analyses, we analyze the intellectual structure of this field. Subject category analysis reveals materials science, construction technology, and environmental engineering as the dominant disciplines, interconnected through 168 links across 64 thematic nodes. Our co-citation analysis identifies 12 major research clusters, with materials science and environmental engineering serving as primary disciplinary pillars. Keyword co-occurrence analysis of 532 nodes connected by 1181 links highlights the field’s emphasis on fly ash, concrete applications, and mechanical properties. Recent citation bursts indicate growing research focus on thermal stability, heavy metal treatment, and innovative processing methods. Through synthesizing these scientometric indicators, this review provides strategic insights for advancing sustainable construction practices through mining waste utilization. Research gaps identified include long-term durability assessment, standardization needs, and scalability challenges. By synthesizing these diverse scientometric indicators, this review provides strategic insights for researchers, industry practitioners, and policymakers, contributing to the advancement of sustainable construction practices through mining waste utilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Vicente Zetola & Brian F. Keith & Elizabeth J. Lam & Ítalo L. Montofré & Rodrigo J. Rojas & Juan Marín & Mathias Becerra, 2024. "From Mine Waste to Construction Materials: A Bibliometric Analysis of Mining Waste Recovery and Tailing Utilization in Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-28, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10314-:d:1529063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10314/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10314/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gohar Feroz Khan & Jacob Wood, 2015. "Information technology management domain: emerging themes and keyword analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 959-972, November.
    2. Anne-Wil Harzing & Satu Alakangas, 2016. "Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(2), pages 787-804, February.
    3. Gohar Feroz Khan & Han Woo Park, 2012. "Editorial: Triple Helix and innovation in Asia using scientometrics, webometrics, and informetrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(1), pages 1-7, January.
    4. Richard Vidgen & Stephan Henneberg & Peter Naudé, 2007. "What sort of community is the European Conference on Information Systems? A social network analysis 1993–2005," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 5-19, February.
    5. Elizabeth J. Lam & Italo L. Montofré & Fernando A. Álvarez & Natalia F. Gaete & Diego A. Poblete & Rodrigo J. Rojas, 2020. "Methodology to Prioritize Chilean Tailings Selection, According to Their Potential Risks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Yunong Wu & Huijie Wang & Zhexiao Wang & Bin Zhang & Burghard C. Meyer, 2019. "Knowledge Mapping Analysis of Rural Landscape Using CiteSpace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Robert D Galliers & Edgar A Whitley, 2007. "Vive les differences? Developing a profile of European information systems research as a basis for international comparisons," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 20-35, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    2. Bruno Michel Roman Pais Seles & Janaina Mascarenhas & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour & Adriana Hoffman Trevisan, 2022. "Smoothing the circular economy transition: The role of resources and capabilities enablers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1814-1837, May.
    3. Cristina López-Duarte & Jane F. Maley & Marta M. Vidal-Suárez, 2021. "Main challenges to international student mobility in the European arena," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(11), pages 8957-8980, November.
    4. de Camargo Fiorini, Paula & Roman Pais Seles, Bruno Michel & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Barberio Mariano, Enzo & de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes, 2018. "Management theory and big data literature: From a review to a research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 112-129.
    5. Vivek Kumar Singh & Prashasti Singh & Mousumi Karmakar & Jacqueline Leta & Philipp Mayr, 2021. "The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 5113-5142, June.
    6. Kuckertz, Andreas & Scheu, Maximilian, 2024. "From chalkboard to boardroom: Unveiling the role of entrepreneurship in bolstering academic achievement among professors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.
    8. Ignacio Rodríguez-Rodríguez & José-Víctor Rodríguez & Niloofar Shirvanizadeh & Andrés Ortiz & Domingo-Javier Pardo-Quiles, 2021. "Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Big Data and the Internet of Things to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scientometric Review Using Text Mining," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-29, August.
    9. Ahmed Tlili & Daniel Burgos & Ronghuai Huang & Sanjaya Mishra & Ramesh Chander Sharma & Aras Bozkurt, 2021. "An Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Publications on Open Educational Practices (OEP) from 2007 to 2020: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Mehdi Rhaiem & Nabil Amara, 2020. "Determinants of research efficiency in Canadian business schools: evidence from scholar-level data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 53-99, October.
    11. Gunasekara, Lahiru & Robb, David J. & Zhang, Abraham, 2023. "Used product acquisition, sorting and disposition for circular supply chains: Literature review and research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    12. Woocheol Kim & Gohar Feroz Khan & Jacob Wood & Muhammad Tariq Mahmood, 2016. "Employee Engagement for Sustainable Organizations: Keyword Analysis Using Social Network Analysis and Burst Detection Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-11, July.
    13. Ana Batlles-delaFuente & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda & Emilio Abad-Segura, 2021. "Sustainable Business Model in the Product-Service System: Analysis of Global Research and Associated EU Legislation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-33, September.
    14. Claudiu Herteliu & Marcel Ausloos & Bogdan Vasile Ileanu & Giulia Rotundo & Tudorel Andrei, 2017. "Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Editor Behavior through Potentially Coercive Citations," Publications, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-16, June.
    15. João Carlos Gonçalves dos Reis, 2021. "Politics, Power, and Influence: Defense Industries in the Post-Cold War," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Anne-Wil Harzing & Satu Alakangas, 2017. "Microsoft Academic is one year old: the Phoenix is ready to leave the nest," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1887-1894, September.
    17. Gutiérrez-Nieto, Begoña & Serrano-Cinca, Carlos, 2019. "20 years of research in microfinance: An information management approach," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 183-197.
    18. Dušan Nikolić & Dragan Ivanović & Lidija Ivanović, 2024. "An open-source tool for merging data from multiple citation databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4573-4595, July.
    19. Fernando Delbianco & Andres Fioriti & Fernando Tohm'e, 2022. "An Assessment Tool for Academic Research Managers in the Third World," Papers 2209.03199, arXiv.org.
    20. Vincent Caby & Lise Frehen, 2021. "How to Produce and Measure Throughput Legitimacy? Lessons from a Systematic Literature Review," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 226-236.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10314-:d:1529063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.