IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i1p10-d475602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politics, Power, and Influence: Defense Industries in the Post-Cold War

Author

Listed:
  • João Carlos Gonçalves dos Reis

    (Industrial Engineering and Management, Faculty of Engineering, Lusofona University, Campo Grande, 1749‐024 Lisbon, Portugal
    CISD Research Unit, Military University Institute, Rua de Pedrouços, 1449-027 Lisbon, Portugal
    Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism, GOVCOPP, Aveiro University, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

The post-Cold War era is placing the defense industry at a crossroads. If, on the one hand, it is under great pressure to guarantee warlike efforts around the world, with tight budgets and uncertain lead-times, on the other hand, it is seen as a central instrument for national sovereignty and foreign policy. The purpose of this research is to report the state-of-the-art of the existing literature and explore the most relevant research areas in order to provide the conceptual basis for further empirical research. To do so, this study uses a preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA), which is an adequate technique as it allows one to discover concepts, ideas, and debates about the defense industry. The results evidenced three different approaches to the defense industry—integration, autarky, and domination. In that regard, we present several case studies in which the defense industry is used as an instrument of foreign policy or national sovereignty. Future studies may focus on empirical research to validate the theoretical findings or to identify variables that lead some defense industries to seek synergies, resorting to mergers and acquisitions, while other defense companies prefer to obtain State funds.

Suggested Citation

  • João Carlos Gonçalves dos Reis, 2021. "Politics, Power, and Influence: Defense Industries in the Post-Cold War," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:10-:d:475602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/1/10/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/1/10/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reis, João & Amorim, Marlene & Melão, Nuno, 2019. "Multichannel service failure and recovery in a O2O era: A qualitative multi-method research in the banking services industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 24-33.
    2. João Reis & Paula Santo & Nuno Melão, 2020. "Impact of Artificial Intelligence Research on Politics of the European Union Member States: The Case Study of Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-27, August.
    3. Stephanie Neuman, 2010. "Power, Influence, And Hierarchy: Defense Industries In A Unipolar World," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 105-134.
    4. Anne-Wil Harzing & Satu Alakangas, 2016. "Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(2), pages 787-804, February.
    5. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    6. Leandro Bolzan de Rezende & Paul Blackwell & Marcos Degaut, 2018. "Brazilian National Defence Policy: foreign policy, national security, economic growth, and technological innovation," Defense & Security Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 385-409, October.
    7. Keith Hartley, 2003. "The future of European defence policy: An economic perspective," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 107-115.
    8. Ole Ellegaard & Johan A. Wallin, 2015. "The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1809-1831, December.
    9. Daniel Fiott, 2017. "Patriotism, Preferences and Serendipity: Understanding the Adoption of the Defence Transfers Directive," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 1045-1061, September.
    10. Bohuslav Pernica, 2020. "The Czech defence and security industry: taking the pulse to an ailing man," Defense & Security Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 234-244, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saïd Echchakoui, 2020. "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(3), pages 165-184, September.
    2. Saïd Echchakoui, 0. "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    3. Gutiérrez-Nieto, Begoña & Serrano-Cinca, Carlos, 2019. "20 years of research in microfinance: An information management approach," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 183-197.
    4. Pattarin Sanguankaew & Vichita Vathanophas Ractham, 2019. "Bibliometric Review of Research on Knowledge Management and Sustainability, 1994–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Weisheng Chiu & Thomas Chun Man Fan & Sang-Back Nam & Ping-Hung Sun, 2021. "Knowledge Mapping and Sustainable Development of eSports Research: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Małgorzata Krzywonos & Zdzisława Romanowska-Duda & Przemysław Seruga & Beata Messyasz & Stanisław Mec, 2023. "The Use of Plants from the Lemnaceae Family for Biofuel Production—A Bibliometric and In-Depth Content Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Sanubari Tansah Tresna & Subiyanto & Sudradjat Supian, 2022. "Mathematical Models for Typhoid Disease Transmission: A Systematic Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Abdul Karim Feroz & Hangjung Zo & Ananth Chiravuri, 2021. "Digital Transformation and Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Karina A. Rus & Ștefan Dezsi & Ovidiu R. Ciascai & Florin Pop, 2022. "Calibrating Evolution of Transformative Tourism: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-40, September.
    10. Daniel El Chami & André Daccache & Maroun El Moujabber, 2020. "How Can Sustainable Agriculture Increase Climate Resilience? A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Wafaurahman Wafa & Amir Hamzah Sharaai & Nitanan Koshy Matthew & Sabrina Abdullah J Ho & Noor Ahmad Akhundzada, 2022. "Organizational Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (OLCSA) for a Higher Education Institution as an Organization: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-29, February.
    12. Elaine Aparecida Regiani Campos & Regina Negri Pagani & Luis Mauricio Resende & Joseane Pontes, 2018. "Construction and qualitative assessment of a bibliographic portfolio using the methodology Methodi Ordinatio," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(2), pages 815-842, August.
    13. Bettina Minder & Patricia Wolf & Matthias Baldauf & Surabhi Verma, 2023. "Voice assistants in private households: a conceptual framework for future research in an interdisciplinary field," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Lukas Folkens & Petra Schneider, 2022. "Responsible Carbon Resource Management through Input-Oriented Cap and Trade (IOCT)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    15. Büşra Alma Çallı & Erman Coşkun, 2021. "A Longitudinal Systematic Review of Credit Risk Assessment and Credit Default Predictors," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    16. Florian Klopfer & René Westerholt & Dietwald Gruehn, 2021. "Conceptual Frameworks for Assessing Climate Change Effects on Urban Areas: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Victor Tiberius & Meike Rietz & Ricarda B. Bouncken, 2020. "Performance Analysis and Science Mapping of Institutional Entrepreneurship Research," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, September.
    18. Lopreite, Milena & Misuraca, Michelangelo & Puliga, Michelangelo, 2023. "An analysis of the thematic evolution of ageing and healthcare expenditure using word embedding: A scoping review of policy implications," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    19. Andrés Martínez-Medina & Sonia Morales-Calvo & Vicenta Rodríguez-Martín & Víctor Meseguer-Sánchez & Valentín Molina-Moreno, 2022. "Sixteen Years since the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: What Have We Learned since Then?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    20. García-Lillo, Francisco & Seva-Larrosa, Pedro & Sánchez-García, Eduardo, 2023. "What is going on in entrepreneurship research? A bibliometric and SNA analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:10-:d:475602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.