IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10197-d1526418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Up? The Illusion of Sustainability and the Limits of Big Tech Self-Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Photini Vrikki

    (Department of Information Studies, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK)

Abstract

This paper offers a critical analysis of the 2023 sustainability reports of five major ICT corporations: Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft. It scrutinises how these organisations use sustainability data, particularly within the context of their actions, their planned initiatives, and visions for the future to report on three overarching sustainability narratives: 1. Reducing the climate footprint of their own operations; 2. Influencing and reducing the climate footprint of their supply chain and consumers; and 3. Financing innovation for climate change. Despite all five corporations expressing a commitment to sustainability and confronting climate change, their specific actions and planned initiatives differ, influenced by their core businesses and existing sustainability practices. This becomes more apparent in their choice to use their own intricate measuring infrastructures for self-tracking and self-reporting environmental data. Such infrastructures, although purportedly aimed at showcasing progress towards sustainability goals, face scrutiny due to their lack of transparency and the potential for manipulation and greenwashing, especially given the lack of standardised reporting protocols within the sector. This analysis highlights that, despite these companies’ claims of commitment to carbon neutrality, their climate pledges and sustainability goals are rarely achieved. In this framework, this paper suggests that a critical approach is essential when evaluating Big Tech’s often deceptive sustainability narratives and underscores the need for more rigorous regulatory frameworks and independent third-party audits to ensure genuine progress towards a sustainable future and true accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Photini Vrikki, 2024. "Measuring Up? The Illusion of Sustainability and the Limits of Big Tech Self-Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10197-:d:1526418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10197/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10197/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Phillips & Judith Schrempf-Stirling & Christian Stutz, 2020. "The Past, History, and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 203-213, October.
    2. Alessio Baratta & Antonio Cimino & Francesco Longo & Vittorio Solina & Saverino Verteramo, 2023. "The Impact of ESG Practices in Industry with a Focus on Carbon Emissions: Insights and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Mohammed Zakaria & Chadi Aoun & Divakaran Liginlal, 2021. "Objective Sustainability Assessment in the Digital Economy: An Information Entropy Measure of Transparency in Corporate Sustainability Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Catalin Popescu & Eglantina Hysa & Alba Kruja & Egla Mansi, 2022. "Social Innovation, Circularity and Energy Transition for Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Practices—A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-28, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hea Young Lim & Ki Han Kwon, 2023. "Sustainable Assessment of the Environmental Activities of Major Cosmetics and Personal Care Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Celia Rangel-Pérez & Belen López & Manuel Fernández, 2024. "A strategic sustainability model for global luxury companies in the management of CO2 emissions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1597-1615, September.
    3. Chenggang Wang & Tiansen Liu & Yue Zhu & Meng Lin & Wenhao Chang & Xinyu Wang & Dongrong Li & He Wang & Jinsol Yoo, 2022. "Digital Economy, Environmental Regulation and Corporate Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, October.
    4. de Almeida, Israel Nunes & Palazzi, Rafael Baptista & Klotzle, Marcelo Cabus & Pinto, Antonio Carlos Figueiredo & Gomes, Leonardo Lima, 2024. "Beyond hype: Unveiling the herd effect in ESG and non-ESG cryptocurrency portfolios," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    5. Diana Joița & Mirela Panait & Carmen-Elena Dobrotă & Alin Diniță & Adrian Neacșa & Laura Elly Naghi, 2023. "The European Dilemma—Energy Security or Green Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Alla Mostepaniuk & Elsie Nasr & Razan Ibrahim Awwad & Sameer Hamdan & Hasan Yousef Aljuhmani, 2022. "Managing a Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Albérico Travassos Rosário & Joana Carmo Dias, 2023. "The New Digital Economy and Sustainability: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    8. Ampedu Raphael & Antwi Agyei Bright & Mang'ati Frank Peter & Boadi Joana Ankobea & Boakye Boateng Gifty & Nunoo Linda Ofeibea & Mensah Cornelius Nii Odoi & Mensah Richmond, 2024. "An Empirical Study on the Influence of ESG Ratings on Earnings Management among Listed Companies in China," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 3678-3693, August.
    9. Costantiello, Alberto & Leogrande, Angelo, 2023. "The Determinants of CO2 Emissions in the Context of ESG Models at World Level," MPRA Paper 117110, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Archana Saxena & Rajesh Singh & Anita Gehlot & Shaik Vaseem Akram & Bhekisipho Twala & Aman Singh & Elisabeth Caro Montero & Neeraj Priyadarshi, 2022. "Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Radka MacGregor Pelikánová & Robert Kenyon MacGregor & Martin Èernek, 2021. "New trends in codes of ethics: Czech business ethics preferences by the dawn of COVID-19," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(4), pages 973-1009, December.
    12. Mantas Svazas & Yuriy Bilan & Valentinas Navickas & Małgorzata Okręglicka, 2023. "Energy Transformation in Municipal Areas—Key Datasets and Their Influence on Process Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Enkeleda Lulaj & Blerta Dragusha & Eglantina Hysa, 2023. "Investigating Accounting Factors through Audited Financial Statements in Businesses toward a Circular Economy: Why a Sustainable Profit through Qualified Staff and Investment in Technology?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, March.
    14. Jun Fan & Lijuan Peng & Tinggui Chen & Guodong Cong, 2024. "The role of social impact on consumer attitudes toward green and healthy home appliances during the COVID-19 pandemic," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28063-28105, November.
    15. Letycja Sołoducho-Pelc & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Natural Environment Protection Strategies and Green Management Style: Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, August.
    16. Hao, Xiaoli & Wen, Shufang & Xue, Yan & Wu, Haitao & Hao, Yu, 2023. "How to improve environment, resources and economic efficiency in the digital era?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    17. Haoyuan Ma & Zhijiang Li & Rui Dong & Decai Tang, 2024. "Influence of Digital Economy on Urban Energy Efficiency in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    18. Arkadiusz Sadowski & Natalia Genstwa-Namysł & Jagoda Zmyślona & Luboš Smutka, 2024. "Environmental Efficiency of Agriculture in Visegrád Group Countries vs. the EU and the World," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Simona Andreea Apostu & Iza Gigauri & Mirela Panait & Pedro A. Martín-Cervantes, 2023. "Is Europe on the Way to Sustainable Development? Compatibility of Green Environment, Economic Growth, and Circular Economy Issues," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, January.
    20. Heekyun Oh, 2024. "The Moderating Role of ESG Administration on the Relationship between Tourism Activities and Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of Basic Local Governments in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-26, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10197-:d:1526418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.