IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v13y2023i3p72-d1084657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Accounting Factors through Audited Financial Statements in Businesses toward a Circular Economy: Why a Sustainable Profit through Qualified Staff and Investment in Technology?

Author

Listed:
  • Enkeleda Lulaj

    (Faculty of Management in Tourism, Hospitality and Environment, “Haxhi Zeka” University, Eliot Engel, 30000 Peja, Kosovo)

  • Blerta Dragusha

    (Faculty of Economy, University of Shkodra, Jeronim De Rada, Sheshi “Dugajt e Reja”, 4001 Shkoder, Albania)

  • Eglantina Hysa

    (Department of Economics, Epoka University, 1032 Tirana, Albania)

Abstract

This study examines the investigation of accounting factors through audited financial statements in businesses by analyzing the qualified staff and investment in technology for sustainable profit. Therefore, the main goal is to analyze whether qualified staff and investment in technology affect the sustainability of profit in businesses through the investigation of accounting factors in the audited financial statements toward a circular economy, more specifically in these financial items: total assets (TASS), and intangible assets (IASS), total liabilities (TLIA), total income (TREV), and net financial income (NFI), based on questions about which financial items businesses should take care of, as well as businesses that do not invest in technologies and skilled staff: does this hinder profit sustainability? Therefore, for this study, data are collected from the financial statements (balance sheet and income statement) of (N = 800) businesses according to their activity (manufacturing businesses = 256, service businesses = 192, and distribution businesses = 353) during the period (2020–2022). The results show that each of the variables and factors had a significant impact on sustainable profit through the circular economy in (N = 800) businesses. However, to have a sustainable profit in business, it is strongly recommended to pay attention to these findings: businesses should (a) be careful with total liabilities, (b) increase the performance of total assets, (c) increase the performance of net financial income, (d) increase the performance of total business income, and (e) increase and develop the skills of workers, as well as improve technology (equipment, machinery, etc.). With implications and limitations, it was difficult to access some of the financial statements; there are only a limited number of variables, so the same models can be analyzed for other businesses, variables, and countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Enkeleda Lulaj & Blerta Dragusha & Eglantina Hysa, 2023. "Investigating Accounting Factors through Audited Financial Statements in Businesses toward a Circular Economy: Why a Sustainable Profit through Qualified Staff and Investment in Technology?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:72-:d:1084657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/3/72/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/3/72/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allal-Chérif, Oihab & Costa Climent, Juan & Ulrich Berenguer, Klaus Jurgen, 2023. "Born to be sustainable: How to combine strategic disruption, open innovation, and process digitization to create a sustainable business," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Xu, Xingmei & Xuan, Chao, 2021. "A study on the motivation of financialization in emerging markets: The case of Chinese nonfinancial corporations," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 606-623.
    3. Villani, Davide, 2021. "Revisiting the external financial dependence index in light of the rise of corporate net lending: What do we really measure?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 361-376.
    4. Lim, Steve C. & Macias, Antonio J. & Moeller, Thomas, 2020. "Intangible assets and capital structure," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Catalin Popescu & Eglantina Hysa & Alba Kruja & Egla Mansi, 2022. "Social Innovation, Circularity and Energy Transition for Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Practices—A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-28, November.
    6. Sun, Xuan Sean & Habib, Ahsan & Bhuiyan, Md. Borhan Uddin, 2020. "Workforce environment and audit fees: International evidence," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    7. Adwan, Sami & Alhaj-Ismail, Alaa & Girardone, Claudia, 2020. "Fair value accounting and value relevance of equity book value and net income for European financial firms during the crisis," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nora Sharkasi & Nguyen Vo Hien Chau & Jay Rajasekera, 2023. "Export Potential Analysis of Vietnamese Bottled Coconut Water by Incorporating Criteria Weights of MCDM into the Gravity of Trade Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-26, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Pengcheng & Jiang, Hongli & Wu, Jiahui, 2022. "Is inhibition of financialization the sub-effect of the green credit policy? Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PB).
    2. Tang, Yajun & Wang, Li & Shu, Haicheng, 2024. "“Tax reduction” and the financialization of real enterprises: Evidence from China’s “VAT reform”," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 835-850.
    3. Barbara Grabinska & Dorota Kedzior & Marcin Kedzior & Konrad Grabinski, 2021. "The Impact of CSR on the Capital Structure of High-Tech Companies in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Huang, Yijing & Xu, Zongyu, 2024. "The role of principal-agent in corporate financialization and green innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. Chengxue Yao & Fan Jiang & Liang Guo, 2023. "Fixed investment or financial assets investment: Evidence from political uncertainty in China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(1), pages 427-450, March.
    6. Yang, Xingquan & Zhao, Rui & Yang, Zheng, 2024. "Preventive regulation and corporate financialization: Evidence from China Securities Regulatory Commission's random inspections," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Emmanuel Adu‐Ameyaw & Albert Danso & Linda Hickson, 2022. "Growth opportunity and investment policy: The role of managerial incentives," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3634-3646, December.
    8. Valery Chistov & Nekane Aramburu & María Eugenia Fabra Florit & Iñaki Peña‐Legazkue & Pauline Weritz, 2023. "Sustainability orientation and firm growth as ventures mature," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5314-5331, December.
    9. Ana Lorena Jiménez-Preciado & Francisco Venegas-Martínez & Abraham Ramírez-García, 2022. "Stock Portfolio Optimization with Competitive Advantages (MOAT): A Machine Learning Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Habib Zaman Khan & Muhammad Nurul Houqe & Ielemia K Ielemia, 2023. "Organic versus cosmetic efforts of the quality of carbon reporting by top New Zealand firms. Does market reward or penalise?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 686-703, January.
    11. Yang, Jizhe & Jiang, Tingfeng & Wen, Xingchun & Dai, Lu, 2024. "Time-varying and spillover effects of the macroeconomy on nonfinancial corporate financialization: Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    12. Diana Joița & Mirela Panait & Carmen-Elena Dobrotă & Alin Diniță & Adrian Neacșa & Laura Elly Naghi, 2023. "The European Dilemma—Energy Security or Green Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Chau Le & Bach Nguyen & Vinh Vo, 2024. "Do intangible assets help SMEs in underdeveloped markets gain access to external finance?—the case of Vietnam," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 833-855, February.
    14. Gill, Andrej & Heller, David, 2024. "Leveraging intellectual property: The value of harmonized enforcement regimes," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    15. Wu, Kai & Lu, Yufei, 2023. "Corporate digital transformation and financialization: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    16. Altomonte, Carlo & Favoino, Domenico & Morlacco, Monica & Sonno, Tommaso, 2021. "Markups, intangible capital and heterogeneous financial frictions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114280, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Mujeeb Saif Mohsen Al-Absy & Redhwan Al-Dhamari & Hamid Abdulkhaleq Hasan Al-Wesabi & Khaldoon Albitar, 2024. "Are country-level political uncertainty and power distance important to the CSR-audit report lag nexus? Evidence from the GCC region," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 483-515, July.
    18. Bilgin, Rumeysa, 2023. "The Selection Of Control Variables In Capital Structure Research With Machine Learning," SocArXiv e26qf, Center for Open Science.
    19. Guangchun Jin & Jian Xu, 2022. "Does Intellectual Capital Affect Financial Leverage of Chinese Agricultural Companies? Exploring the Role of Firm Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, February.
    20. Archana Saxena & Rajesh Singh & Anita Gehlot & Shaik Vaseem Akram & Bhekisipho Twala & Aman Singh & Elisabeth Caro Montero & Neeraj Priyadarshi, 2022. "Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:72-:d:1084657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.