IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10168-d1525884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Carbon Footprint Including Process-Level Calculation and Its Influencing Factors of Process for Low-Carbon and Sustainable Textile Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Hakan Alıcı

    (Kıvanç Textile Industry and Commerce Incorporated Company, 01040 Adana, Türkiye
    Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Adana Alparslan Türkeş Science and Technology University, 01250 Adana, Türkiye)

  • Beyza Nur Yiğit

    (Kıvanç Textile Industry and Commerce Incorporated Company, 01040 Adana, Türkiye)

  • Betül Menemencioğlu

    (Kıvanç Textile Industry and Commerce Incorporated Company, 01040 Adana, Türkiye)

  • Kübra Tümay Ateş

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Çukurova University, 01330 Adana, Türkiye)

  • Özge Demirdelen

    (Department of Law, Çağ University, 33800 Mersin, Türkiye)

  • Tuğçe Demirdelen

    (Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Adana Alparslan Türkeş Science and Technology University, 01250 Adana, Türkiye)

  • Ziya Kıvanç

    (Kıvanç Textile Industry and Commerce Incorporated Company, 01040 Adana, Türkiye)

Abstract

Climate change stands out as a significant environmental issue on a global scale, with greenhouse gases being one of its primary drivers. The greenhouse gas process provides a critical framework for understanding the sources, emissions, and environmental impacts of these gases. This article presents an overview of the fundamental elements of the greenhouse gas process in the textile sector and discusses how it should be managed in line with sustainability goals. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ), nitrous oxides (N 2 O), and fluorinated gases are the most common greenhouse gases, each derived from different sources. The textile sector is particularly associated with high greenhouse gas emissions, especially in areas such as energy consumption, water usage, and waste management. Therefore, measurements taken in factories are crucial for identifying emission sources and developing reduction strategies. This article examines in detail the greenhouse gas emissions resulting from various activities at Kıvanç Textile. Energy consumption, particularly the emissions resulting from the fuels used in electricity and heating processes, is evaluated. Additionally, emissions from other important sources such as refrigerant gas leaks, waste management, and transportation are analyzed. The measurement process was carried out in accordance with national and international standards. The greenhouse gas inventory includes data on energy consumption, fuel consumption, refrigerant gas usage, transportation, production process management, and waste management throughout the factory. Based on these data, the total amount and sources of emissions were determined. This study presents a systematic method for calculating a company’s carbon footprint, with data collected in accordance with national and international standards. Such data can provide a reference point for other companies when making similar calculations. All of the businesses of the facility where the study was conducted were examined and calculations were made on a total of 1350 employees. As a result of the detailed study, Kıvanç Textile’s corporate carbon footprint for 2023 was calculated as a total of 68,746.86 tons C O 2 e . According to this data obtained, Kıvanç Textile emitted 50.92 tons of C O 2 e greenhouse gases per employee. At the same time, it was determined that the production in 2023 was 4,427,082 tons and a greenhouse gas emission of 15.53 tons of C O 2 e per production (ton) was calculated. This study also includes proposed strategies for reducing emissions. These strategies include energy efficiency measures, the use of renewable energy sources, waste reduction, and the adoption of efficient production processes. In conclusion, this article emphasizes the importance of efforts to measure and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in textile factories. Kıvanç Textile’s greenhouse gas measurements provide a fundamental reference for achieving sustainability goals in the sector. The data obtained will support the factory’s efforts to reduce its carbon footprint and minimize its environmental impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Hakan Alıcı & Beyza Nur Yiğit & Betül Menemencioğlu & Kübra Tümay Ateş & Özge Demirdelen & Tuğçe Demirdelen & Ziya Kıvanç, 2024. "Analysis of Carbon Footprint Including Process-Level Calculation and Its Influencing Factors of Process for Low-Carbon and Sustainable Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-24, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10168-:d:1525884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10168/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10168/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Yaowang & Yang, Xuxin & Du, Ershun & Liu, Yuliang & Zhang, Shixu & Yang, Chen & Zhang, Ning & Liu, Chang, 2024. "A review on carbon emission accounting approaches for the electricity power industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    2. Pırıl Tekin & Hakan Alıcı & Tuğçe Demirdelen, 2024. "A Life Cycle Analysis of a Polyester–Wool Blended Fabric and Associated Carbon Emissions in the Textile Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Sofia Plakantonaki & Kyriaki Kiskira & Nikolaos Zacharopoulos & Ioannis Chronis & Fernando Coelho & Amir Togiani & Konstantinos Kalkanis & Georgios Priniotakis, 2023. "A Review of Sustainability Standards and Ecolabeling in the Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Juliane Peters & Ana Simaens, 2020. "Integrating Sustainability into Corporate Strategy: A Case Study of the Textile and Clothing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-35, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arif Mostafa Khan & Meine Pieter van Dijk, 2024. "The role of multi‐stakeholder initiatives in advancing circularity and social sustainability in the textiles sector of Bangladesh," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 1765-1788, April.
    2. Ana Maria Corrales-Estrada & Loyda Lily Gómez-Santos & Cesar Augusto Bernal-Torres & Jaime Eric Rodriguez-López, 2021. "Sustainability and Resilience Organizational Capabilities to Enhance Business Continuity Management: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Xi Zhao & Siqin Zhang & Najid Ahmad & Shuangguo Wang & Jiaxing Zhao, 2024. "Unlocking Sustainable Growth: The Transformative Impact of Green Finance on Industrial Carbon Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Adam Sulich & Letycja Sołoducho-Pelc, 2021. "Renewable Energy Producers’ Strategies in the Visegrád Group Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Yong Cui & Jian Zheng & Wenying Wu & Kun Xu & Desen Ji & Tian Di, 2024. "Framework and Outlooks of Multi-Source–Grid–Load Coordinated Low-Carbon Operational Systems Considering Demand-Side Hierarchical Response," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Crisan Popescu & Michaela Dina Stanescu, 2024. "Eco-Friendly Processing of Wool and Sustainable Valorization of This Natural Bioresource," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-35, May.
    7. An, Yimeng & Dang, Yaoguo & Wang, Junjie & Zhou, Huimin & Mai, Son T., 2024. "Mixed-frequency data Sampling Grey system Model: Forecasting annual CO2 emissions in China with quarterly and monthly economic-energy indicators," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    8. Marta Stanislawska, 2022. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Energy Crisis on CSR Policy in Transport Industry in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-32, November.
    9. Filipa D. Fonseca & Lyudmyla Symochko & M. Nazaré Coelho Pinheiro, 2024. "Grape Pomace ( Vitis vinifera L.) Waste Valorization: Assessing Its Potential as a Sustainable Natural Dye for Textiles Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Maria José Gomes & António Sousa & Jorge Novas & Ricardo Vinícius Dias Jordão, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability in Viticulture as a Balanced Scorecard Perspective of the Wine Industry: Evidence for the Portuguese Region of Alentejo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Khaliquzzaman Choudhury & Marina Tsianou & Paschalis Alexandridis, 2024. "Recycling of Blended Fabrics for a Circular Economy of Textiles: Separation of Cotton, Polyester, and Elastane Fibers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-49, July.
    12. Idiano D’Adamo & Marta Gagliarducci & Martina Iannilli & Valeria Mangani, 2024. "Fashion Wears Sustainable Leather: A Social and Strategic Analysis Toward Sustainable Production and Consumption Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-35, November.
    13. Pinjie Xie & Sheng Wang & Jie Liao & Feihu Sun, 2024. "Study on Spatial-Temporal Disparities and Factors Influencing Electricity Consumption Carbon Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Grazia Dicuonzo & Graziana Galeone & Simona Ranaldo & Mario Turco, 2020. "The Key Drivers of Born-Sustainable Businesses: Evidence from the Italian Fashion Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Michele Molin & Lisa Pizzol & Marco Pesce & Alessandro Maura & Matteo Civiero & Elisa Gritti & Simone Giotto & Alberto Ferri & Lorenzo Liguoro & Carlo Bagnoli & Elena Semenzin, 2023. "An integrated decision‐making framework for corporate sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1145-1160, May.
    16. Ewa Stawicka, 2021. "Sustainable Business Strategies as an Element Influencing Diffusion on Innovative Solutions in the Field of Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, September.
    17. Qingyun Xu & Kongqing Li, 2024. "Land Use Carbon Emission Estimation and Simulation of Carbon-Neutral Scenarios Based on System Dynamics in Coastal City: A Case Study of Nantong, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10168-:d:1525884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.