IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9483-d1511442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Aggregated Sustainability Indicators for Quality of Life Evaluations in Urban Areas of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Meiran Zhiyenbayev

    (Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Department, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)

  • Nadezhda Kunicina

    (Faculty of Computer Science, Information Technology and Energy, Riga Technical University, LV-1048 Rīga, Latvia)

  • Madina Mansurova

    (Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Department, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)

  • Antons Patlins

    (Faculty of Computer Science, Information Technology and Energy, Riga Technical University, LV-1048 Rīga, Latvia)

  • Jelena Caiko

    (Faculty of Computer Science, Information Technology and Energy, Riga Technical University, LV-1048 Rīga, Latvia)

  • Vladimir Beliaev

    (Faculty of Computer Science, Information Technology and Energy, Riga Technical University, LV-1048 Rīga, Latvia)

  • Roberts Grants

    (Faculty of Computer Science, Information Technology and Energy, Riga Technical University, LV-1048 Rīga, Latvia)

  • Martins Bisenieks

    (Faculty of Computer Science, Information Technology and Energy, Riga Technical University, LV-1048 Rīga, Latvia)

  • Guldana Shyntore

    (Computer Engineering Department, International University of Information Technologies, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

This study presents a novel methodology for evaluating the quality of life in urban areas of Kazakhstan through the development of tailored sustainability indicators. While urban livability and sustainability are global concerns, few studies have focused on developing comprehensive, region-specific metrics for assessing these factors in Kazakhstan, a country with diverse urban environments and newly established administrative divisions. This research fills a critical gap by creating aggregated indicators that address economic, social, environmental, and infrastructural dimensions in a uniquely Kazakhstan context. The study goes beyond the existing literature by integrating local dynamics and challenges, offering a nuanced understanding of urban sustainability that reflects the country’s regional characteristics. The findings provide policymakers and urban planners with actionable insights to improve quality of life and make informed decisions. Moreover, the methodology is designed for ongoing application, allowing for continuous monitoring and adaptation to evolving urban development strategies across Kazakhstan. This research advances the field by offering a replicable framework that can be adapted to other regions with similar complexities.

Suggested Citation

  • Meiran Zhiyenbayev & Nadezhda Kunicina & Madina Mansurova & Antons Patlins & Jelena Caiko & Vladimir Beliaev & Roberts Grants & Martins Bisenieks & Guldana Shyntore, 2024. "Development of Aggregated Sustainability Indicators for Quality of Life Evaluations in Urban Areas of the Republic of Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-30, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9483-:d:1511442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9483/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9483/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodrik, Dani, 2004. "Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century," Working Paper Series rwp04-047, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    2. Ho, William, 2008. "Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 211-228, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dennis, Allen & Shepherd, Ben, 2007. "Trade costs, barriers to entry, and export diversification in developing countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4368, The World Bank.
    2. Li, Yan-Lai & Tang, Jia-Fu & Chin, Kwai-Sang & Jiang, Yu-Shi & Han, Yi & Pu, Yun, 2011. "Estimating the final priority ratings of engineering characteristics in mature-period product improvement by MDBA and AHP," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 575-586, June.
    3. Shafaeddin, Mehdi, 2010. "Trade liberalization, industrialization and development; experience of recent decades," MPRA Paper 26355, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Nermin Kişi, 2019. "A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Tourism Development Using the A’WOT Hybrid Method: A Case Study of Zonguldak, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Inayat U. Mangla & Muslehud Din, 2015. "The Impact of the Macroeconomic Environment on Pakistan’s Manufacturing Sector," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 20(Special E), pages 241-260, September.
    6. Lütkenhorst, Wilfried, 2018. "Creating wealth without labour? Emerging contours of a new techno-economic landscape," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    7. Nathan, Max & Rosso, Anna, 2014. "Mapping information economy businesses with big data: findings from the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60615, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    9. Vu, Khuong & Hartley, Kris, 2018. "Promoting smart cities in developing countries: Policy insights from Vietnam," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 845-859.
    10. Ufuk Akcigit & Sina T. Ates & Giammario Impullitti, 2018. "Innovation and Trade Policy in a Globalized World," NBER Working Papers 24543, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Diogo Ferraz & Fernanda P. S. Falguera & Enzo B. Mariano & Dominik Hartmann, 2021. "Linking Economic Complexity, Diversification, and Industrial Policy with Sustainable Development: A Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    12. Naved Hamid & Maha Khan, 2015. "Pakistan: A Case of Premature Deindustrialization?," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 20(Special E), pages 107-141, September.
    13. Hardik A. Marfatia, 2016. "The Role of Push and Pull Factors in Driving Global Capital Flows," Applied Economics Quarterly (formerly: Konjunkturpolitik), Duncker & Humblot GmbH, Berlin, vol. 62(2), pages 117-146.
    14. Juan Cabello Eras & Dayli Covas Varela & Gilberto Hernández Pérez & Alexis Sagastume Gutiérrez & Dunia García Lorenzo & Carlo Vandecasteele & Luc Hens, 2014. "Comparative study of the urban quality of life in Cuban first-level cities from an objective dimension," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 195-215, February.
    15. Frederick van der Ploeg & Steven Poelhekke, 2008. "Globalization and the rise of mega-cities in the developing world," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(3), pages 477-501.
    16. Ron Boschma, 2021. "Designing Smart Specialization Policy: relatedness, unrelatedness, or what?," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2128, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2021.
    17. Elvira Uyarra & Jens Sörvik & Inger Midtkandal, 2014. "Inter-regional Collaboration in Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3). S3 Working Paper Series no 6/2014," JRC Research Reports JRC91963, Joint Research Centre.
    18. Alfons Palangkaraya, 2013. "On the Relationship between Innovation and Export: The Case of Australian SMEs," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2013n04, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    19. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    20. Ricardo Hausmann & Jason Hwang & Dani Rodrik, 2007. "What you export matters," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9483-:d:1511442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.