IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9255-d1506090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promoting Urban Corridors in Saudi City Center to Enhance Walkability Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Analysis Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Aloshan

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia)

  • Moustafa Gharieb

    (Department of Architecture, College of Architecture and Planning, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia)

  • Khaled Mahmoud Heba

    (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11371, Egypt)

  • Ragab Khalil

    (Civil Engineering Department, Onaizah Colleges, Onaizah 56447, Saudi Arabia
    Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt)

  • Mohammed Humaid Alhumaid

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohamed Salah Ezz

    (Architectural Department, College of Engineering and Information Technology, Onaizah Colleges, Onaizah 56447, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Architecture, The Higher Institute for Engineering and Technology of Obour, K21 Cairo/Bilbies Rd, Obour City 11828, Egypt)

Abstract

Saudi Arabian cities have rapidly expanded their urban areas, especially their city centers, over the last four decades. This growth has led to increased vehicular usage. As a result, the daily walking experience for residents has been adversely affected. Walkability has several positive effects on people’s health and the urban environment. It serves as a means of transportation and helps create a sense of place. This enhances the legibility of urban structures and deepens emotional bonds with the city. This study uses the medium-sized Saudi Arabian city of Onaizah as a case study. It explores the feasibility of creating urban walking corridors to encourage more walking. According to Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030, sustainable urban development and improved quality of life are key priorities. The study addresses walkability as a way to enhance the urban landscape of the city center. Geographic Information Systems (GISs) were used to analyze data and generate urban corridors in the city center. The results indicate that walking in Onaizah can be improved through three urban corridors. These corridors measure 1335 m, 1624 m, and 1937 m, respectively. They represent urban, commercial, and heritage corridors. This provides planners and decision makers an opportunity to prioritize pedestrian connectivity and improve the physical environment. Such efforts contribute to sustainable urban development. Various criteria-analysis methods were employed to assess the factors that led to the conclusion of these urban corridors. This includes evaluations of land use, transportation, and environmental considerations. The study aligns with Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 by promoting walking and enhancing overall walkability. It also aims to create a sustainable and livable urban environment for the community in Onaizah.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Aloshan & Moustafa Gharieb & Khaled Mahmoud Heba & Ragab Khalil & Mohammed Humaid Alhumaid & Mohamed Salah Ezz, 2024. "Promoting Urban Corridors in Saudi City Center to Enhance Walkability Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Analysis Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-23, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9255-:d:1506090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9255/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9255/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayse Ozbil & Tugce Gurleyen & Demet Yesiltepe & Ezgi Zunbuloglu, 2019. "Comparative Associations of Street Network Design, Streetscape Attributes and Land-Use Characteristics on Pedestrian Flows in Peripheral Neighbourhoods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Fernando Fonseca & Escolástica Fernandes & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Walkable Cities: Using the Smart Pedestrian Net Method for Evaluating a Pedestrian Network in Guimarães, Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Jeeun Lee & Sohyun Park, 2018. "Exploring Neighborhood Unit’s Planning Elements and Configuration Methods in Seoul and Singapore from a Walkability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalia Distefano & Salvatore Leonardi & Nilda Georgina Liotta, 2023. "Walking for Sustainable Cities: Factors Affecting Users’ Willingness to Walk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Jie Ding & Zhengdong Gao & Shanshan Ma, 2022. "Understanding Social Spaces in Tourist Villages through Space Syntax Analysis: Cases of Villages in Huizhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Duncan, Michael, 2023. "The influence of pedestrian plans on walk commuting in US municipalities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Yibang Zhang & Yukun Zou & Zhenjun Zhu & Xiucheng Guo & Xin Feng, 2022. "Evaluating Pedestrian Environment Using DeepLab Models Based on Street Walkability in Small and Medium-Sized Cities: Case Study in Gaoping, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Olivia Psara & Fernando Fonseca & Olympia Nisiforou & Rui Ramos, 2023. "Evaluation of Urban Sustainability Based on Transportation and Green Spaces: The Case of Limassol, Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Roussetos-Marios Stefanidis & Alexandros Bartzokas-Tsiompras, 2024. "Pedestrian Accessibility Analysis of Sidewalk-Specific Networks: Insights from Three Latin American Central Squares," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-22, October.
    7. Jiemei Luo & Edwin H. W. Chan & Jinfeng Du & Linxia Feng & Peng Jiang & Ying Xu, 2022. "Developing a Health-Spatial Indicator System for a Healthy City in Small and Midsized Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Yang, Wei & Hu, Jie & Liu, Yong & Guo, Wenbo, 2023. "Examining the influence of neighborhood and street-level built environment on fitness jogging in Chengdu, China: A massive GPS trajectory data analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Michael W. Mehaffy & Nikos A. Salingaros & Alexandros A. Lavdas, 2023. "The “Modern” Campus: Case Study in (Un)Sustainable Urbanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-37, November.
    10. Jin Zuo & Tong Mu & Tian-Yi Xiao & Jian-Cheng Luo, 2021. "Evaluation of Walking Comfort in Children’s School Travel at Street Scale: A Case Study in Tianjin (China)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Beata J. Gawryszewska & Izabela Myszka & Michał Banaszek & Axel Schwerk, 2023. "Periurban Streetscape—Vernacular Front Gardens and Their Potential to Provide Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Warsaw, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Dadi An & Yan Liu & Yihua Huang, 2023. "The Influence of Street Components on Age Diversity: A Case Study on a Living Street in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Zhehao Zhang & Haiming Wang & Lei Pang & Thomas Fisher & Shuo Yang, 2023. "Comparisons of Built Environment Correlates of Walking in Urban and Suburban Campuses: A Case Study of Tianjin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, October.
    14. Eun Jung Kim & Suin Jin, 2023. "Walk Score and Neighborhood Walkability: A Case Study of Daegu, South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-12, February.
    15. Suin Jin & Eun Jung Kim, 2024. "Correlation of the Walk Score and Environmental Perceptions with Perceived Neighborhood Walkability: The Quantile Regression Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9255-:d:1506090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.