IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i4p988-d138344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Neighborhood Unit’s Planning Elements and Configuration Methods in Seoul and Singapore from a Walkability Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jeeun Lee

    (Department of Architecture & Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Sohyun Park

    (Department of Architecture & Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea)

Abstract

This paper is to explore how the neighborhood-unit concept, which had been initially promoted by North America and the United Kingdom, was adopted and utilized in the Asian cities of high-density developments, such as Seoul and Singapore from a walkability perspective. Among various environmental elements of walkability in a given neighborhood unit, 10 planning elements, as well as their configuration methods, were drawn from the review of the existing studies, which became an analytical framework for this paper. The findings of the analysis are as follows. First, there were similarities, yet also marked distinctions between the cases of Seoul and Singapore, on the one hand, and those in North America and the UK on the other, with respect to the configuration methods, categorized into four groups of typologies: ‘Neighborhood Size’, ‘Neighborhood Structure’, ‘Neighborhood Network’, and ‘Neighborhood Facilities’. The differences largely resulted from the high-density developments in Seoul and Singapore. In the years since the 1990s, however, when the concept of sustainable development was strengthened, the configuration methods, related to ‘Neighborhood Structure’ and to ‘Neighborhood Facilities’ in most cases, were enhanced to suit more neighborhood walking. The initial concept of the neighborhood unit was actively modified to accommodate the high-density urban situations in Seoul and Singapore, having both positive and negative impacts on neighborhood walkability.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeeun Lee & Sohyun Park, 2018. "Exploring Neighborhood Unit’s Planning Elements and Configuration Methods in Seoul and Singapore from a Walkability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:988-:d:138344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/988/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/988/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth Macdonald & Nicola Szibbo & William Eisenstein & Louise Mozingo, 2018. "Quality-of-service: toward a standardized rating tool for pedestrian quality of urban streets," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 71-93, January.
    2. Jason Brody, 2013. "The Neighbourhood Unit Concept and the Shaping of Land Planning in the United States 1912-1968," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 340-362, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eun Jung Kim & Suin Jin, 2023. "Walk Score and Neighborhood Walkability: A Case Study of Daegu, South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-12, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khaled Alawadi & Ngoc Hong Nguyen & Mariam Alkaabi, 2023. "The edge and the center in neighborhood planning units: assessing permeability and edge attractiveness in Abu Dhabi," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 677-705, April.
    2. Justyna Rubaszek & Janusz Gubański & Anna Podolska, 2023. "Do We Need Public Green Spaces Accessibility Standards for the Sustainable Development of Urban Settlements? The Evidence from Wrocław, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Yuhan Shao & Yuting Yin & Dongbo Ma, 2023. "Evaluating the Equity of Urban Streetscapes in Promoting Human Health—Taking Shanghai Inner City as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Gaia Caramellino, 2022. "“You and Your Neighborhood”: Neighborhood, Community, and Democracy as New Paradigms in Wartime American Architecture," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 369-384.
    5. Obi Thompson Sargoni & Ed Manley, 2023. "Neighbourhood-level pedestrian navigation using the construal level theory," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(8), pages 2151-2170, October.
    6. Shirgaokar, Manish & Reynard, Darcy & Collins, Damian, 2021. "Using twitter to investigate responses to street reallocation during COVID-19: Findings from the U.S. and Canada," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 300-312.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:988-:d:138344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.