IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p9057-d1502185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Offshore Wind Farms: Environmental and Social Perspectives from Uruguay

Author

Listed:
  • Milagros Forastiero

    (Offshore Wind Energy Research Group, Universidad Tecnológica del Uruguay, Francisco Antonio Maciel s/n esq, Luis Morquio, Durazno CP 97000, Uruguay)

  • Rodrigo Gutiérrez

    (Offshore Wind Energy Research Group, Universidad Tecnológica del Uruguay, Francisco Antonio Maciel s/n esq, Luis Morquio, Durazno CP 97000, Uruguay)

  • Franciele Weschenfelder

    (Offshore Wind Energy Research Group, Universidad Tecnológica del Uruguay, Francisco Antonio Maciel s/n esq, Luis Morquio, Durazno CP 97000, Uruguay)

  • Everton de Almeida

    (Offshore Wind Energy Research Group, Universidad Tecnológica del Uruguay, Francisco Antonio Maciel s/n esq, Luis Morquio, Durazno CP 97000, Uruguay)

  • Jesus C. Hernandez

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Jaén, Campus Lagunillas s/n, Edificio A3, 23071 Jaén, Spain)

Abstract

The installation of offshore wind farms is rising, driven by the goal of changing the global energy matrix. However, many of their possible impacts are still unknown. Increased noise levels, disruptions to food chains, pollution due to traffic, and impacts on fishing communities and tourism are all potential effects to consider. Marine habitats are essential carbon dioxide sinks. Therefore, losing marine biodiversity due to offshore wind farms can be counterproductive in mitigating climate change. Balancing biodiversity conservation, wind potential, and political interests is challenging. Today, Uruguay has significantly decreased the fossil share in its electricity generation, incorporating electricity generation from wind, solar, and biomass energy alongside hydroelectricity. In line with this, the country’s Hydrogen Roadmap highlights green hydrogen as relevant, potentially serving as a fuel for both domestic and export transportation. Combining the country’s strong base of wind energy production experience with its sustainable policy, it plans to implement offshore wind farms to produce green hydrogen, making studies of its impacts crucial. This paper reviews the current social and environmental information on the Uruguayan coastal habitat, analyzes onshore wind farms’ ecological studies, and examines offshore wind farms’ global environmental and social impacts. Finally, it proposes studies for environmental approval of offshore wind farms.

Suggested Citation

  • Milagros Forastiero & Rodrigo Gutiérrez & Franciele Weschenfelder & Everton de Almeida & Jesus C. Hernandez, 2024. "Effects of Offshore Wind Farms: Environmental and Social Perspectives from Uruguay," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:9057-:d:1502185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/9057/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/9057/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chang, Tian-Pau & Liu, Feng-Jiao & Ko, Hong-Hsi & Cheng, Shih-Ping & Sun, Li-Chung & Kuo, Shye-Chorng, 2014. "Comparative analysis on power curve models of wind turbine generator in estimating capacity factor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 88-95.
    2. Kaldellis, J.K. & Apostolou, D. & Kapsali, M. & Kondili, E., 2016. "Environmental and social footprint of offshore wind energy. Comparison with onshore counterpart," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 543-556.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ho, Lip-Wah & Lie, Tek-Tjing & Leong, Paul TM & Clear, Tony, 2018. "Developing offshore wind farm siting criteria by using an international Delphi method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 53-67.
    2. Aldersey-Williams, John & Broadbent, Ian D. & Strachan, Peter A., 2020. "Analysis of United Kingdom offshore wind farm performance using public data: Improving the evidence base for policymaking," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Mehrjoo, Mehrdad & Jafari Jozani, Mohammad & Pawlak, Miroslaw, 2021. "Toward hybrid approaches for wind turbine power curve modeling with balanced loss functions and local weighting schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    4. Lingqian Meng & Hongyan Ding, 2022. "Experimental Study on the Contact Force between the Vessel and CBF in the Integrated Floating Transportation Process of Offshore Wind Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-10, October.
    5. He, J.Y. & Chan, P.W. & Li, Q.S. & Huang, Tao & Yim, Steve Hung Lam, 2024. "Assessment of urban wind energy resource in Hong Kong based on multi-instrument observations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. de Medeiros, Armando Lúcio Ramos & Araújo, Alex Maurício & de Oliveira Filho, Oyama Douglas Queiroz & Rohatgi, Janardan & dos Santos, Maurílio José, 2015. "Analysis of design parameters of large-sized wind turbines by non-dimensional model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 1146-1154.
    7. John Dorrell & Keunjae Lee, 2020. "The Cost of Wind: Negative Economic Effects of Global Wind Energy Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Wang, Xuefei & Zeng, Xiangwu & Yang, Xu & Li, Jiale, 2019. "Seismic response of offshore wind turbine with hybrid monopile foundation based on centrifuge modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1335-1350.
    9. Yang Hu & Yilin Qiao & Jingchun Chu & Ling Yuan & Lei Pan, 2019. "Joint Point-Interval Prediction and Optimization of Wind Power Considering the Sequential Uncertainties of Stepwise Procedure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Antonio Bracale & Pasquale De Falco, 2015. "An Advanced Bayesian Method for Short-Term Probabilistic Forecasting of the Generation of Wind Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Kumar, Dipesh & Chatterjee, Kalyan, 2016. "A review of conventional and advanced MPPT algorithms for wind energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 957-970.
    12. Vasileiou, Margarita & Loukogeorgaki, Eva & Vagiona, Dimitra G., 2017. "GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for site selection of hybrid offshore wind and wave energy systems in Greece," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 745-757.
    13. Ulazia, Alain & Saenz, Jon & Ibarra-Berastegui, Gabriel, 2016. "Sensitivity to the use of 3DVAR data assimilation in a mesoscale model for estimating offshore wind energy potential. A case study of the Iberian northern coastline," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 617-627.
    14. André Claro & João A. Santos & David Carvalho, 2023. "Assessing the Future wind Energy Potential in Portugal Using a CMIP6 Model Ensemble and WRF High-Resolution Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Benjamin Pakenham & Anna Ermakova & Ali Mehmanparast, 2021. "A Review of Life Extension Strategies for Offshore Wind Farms Using Techno-Economic Assessments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Al-Madani, Mohammed Hammam Mohammed & Fernando, Yudi & Iranmanesh, Mohammad & Lim, Ming K. & Tseng, Ming-Lang, 2024. "Renewable energy supply chain in Malaysia: Fostering energy management practices and ecological performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    17. Jan Michna & Krzysztof Rogowski & Galih Bangga & Martin O. L. Hansen, 2021. "Accuracy of the Gamma Re-Theta Transition Model for Simulating the DU-91-W2-250 Airfoil at High Reynolds Numbers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-29, December.
    18. Fu, Z.H. & Xie, Y.L. & Li, W. & Lu, W.T. & Guo, H.C., 2017. "An inexact multi-objective programming model for an economy-energy-environment system under uncertainty: A case study of Urumqi, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 165-178.
    19. Feng, Cong & Sun, Mucun & Cui, Mingjian & Chartan, Erol Kevin & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & Zhang, Jie, 2019. "Characterizing forecastability of wind sites in the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1352-1365.
    20. Lüth, Alexandra & Seifert, Paul E. & Egging-Bratseth, Ruud & Weibezahn, Jens, 2023. "How to connect energy islands: Trade-offs between hydrogen and electricity infrastructure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:9057-:d:1502185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.