IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8848-d1497428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing a Coal Mine Safety Knowledge Graph to Promote the Association and Reuse of Risk Management Empirical Knowledge

Author

Listed:
  • Jiangshi Zhang

    (School of Emergency Management & Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
    State Key Laboratory for Fine Exploration and Intelligent Development of Coal Resources, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yongtun Li

    (School of Emergency Management & Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jingru Wu

    (School of Emergency Management & Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xiaofeng Ren

    (School of Safety Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Yaona Wang

    (School of Emergency Management & Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Hongfu Jia

    (School of Emergency Management & Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Mengyu Xie

    (School of Emergency Management & Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Coal mining production processes are complex and prone to frequent accidents. With the continuous improvement of safety management systems in China’s coal mining industry, a vast amount of coal mine safety experience knowledge (CMSEK) has been accumulated, originating from on site operations. This knowledge has been recorded and stored in paper or electronic documents but it remains unconnected, and the increasing volume of documents further complicates the reuse and sharing of this knowledge. In the era of large models and digitalization, this knowledge has yet to be fully developed and utilized. To address these issues, a risk management checklist was derived from coal mining site data. By integrating intelligent algorithm models and the coal industry knowledge engineering design, a coal mine safety experience knowledge graph (CMSEKG) was developed to enhance the efficiency of utilizing coal mine safety experience knowledge. Specifically, we creatively developed a coal mine safety experience knowledge representation framework, capable of representing coal mine risk inspection records from different sources and of various types. Furthermore, we proposed a deep learning-based coal mine safety entity recognition model (CMSNER), which can effectively extract coal mine safety experience knowledge from text. Finally, the CMSEKG was stored using the Neo4j graph database, and a knowledge graph was constructed using selected case information as examples. The CMSEKG effectively integrates fragmented safety management experience and professional knowledge, promoting knowledge services and intelligent applications in coal mining operations, thereby providing knowledge support for the prevention and management of coal mine risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiangshi Zhang & Yongtun Li & Jingru Wu & Xiaofeng Ren & Yaona Wang & Hongfu Jia & Mengyu Xie, 2024. "Constructing a Coal Mine Safety Knowledge Graph to Promote the Association and Reuse of Risk Management Empirical Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8848-:d:1497428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8848/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8848/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ze Wang & Huajiao Li & Renwu Tang, 2019. "Network analysis of coal mine hazards based on text mining and link prediction," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 30(07), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Ziwei Fa & Xinchun Li & Quanlong Liu & Zunxiang Qiu & Zhengyuan Zhai, 2021. "Correlation in Causality: A Progressive Study of Hierarchical Relations within Human and Organizational Factors in Coal Mine Accidents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaofang Wo & Guichen Li & Yuantian Sun & Jinghua Li & Sen Yang & Haoran Hao, 2022. "The Changing Tendency and Association Analysis of Intelligent Coal Mines in China: A Policy Text Mining Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Xiangmei, Wang & Xiaoxiao, Geng & Wang, Yingchen, 2023. "Research on the network topology characteristics of unsafe behavior propagation in coal mine group from the perspective of human factors," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    3. Roger Jensen & David P. Gilkey, 2023. "Risk-Reduction Research in Occupational Safety and Ergonomics: An Editorial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-4, March.
    4. Li Yang & Xue Wang & Junqi Zhu & Liyan Sun & Zhiyuan Qin, 2022. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Deep Coal Miners’ Unsafe Behavior Based on HFACS-CM-SEM-SD," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-29, August.
    5. Shen, Junjie & Huang, Shupei, 2022. "Copper cross-market volatility transition based on a coupled hidden Markov model and the complex network method," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. Samuel Zanferdini Oliva & Livia Oliveira-Ciabati & Denise Gazotto Dezembro & Mário Sérgio Adolfi Júnior & Maísa Carvalho Silva & Hugo Cesar Pessotti & Juliana Tarossi Pollettini, 2021. "Text structuring methods based on complex network: a systematic review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1471-1493, February.
    7. Lei Chen & Hongxia Li & Shuicheng Tian, 2022. "Application of AHP and DEMATEL for Identifying Factors Influencing Coal Mine Practitioners’ Unsafe State," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8848-:d:1497428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.