IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v85y2023ipas0301420723007316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the network topology characteristics of unsafe behavior propagation in coal mine group from the perspective of human factors

Author

Listed:
  • Xiangmei, Wang
  • Xiaoxiao, Geng
  • Wang, Yingchen

Abstract

The occurrence of coal mine accidents is mostly caused by people's unsafe behaviors. People's unsafe behaviors are closely related and there are group differences. Traditional propagation models are difficult to analyze the topological characteristics of the network and group unsafe behaviors. In order to analyze the unsafe behavior of the coal mine group and explore the internal relationship of its communication network, the unsafe behavior of the coal mine group was studied based on the original data on coal mine accident reports in the past three years. First, based on the grounded theory, the unsafe behaviors of coal mine groups are extracted from the perspective of human factor analysis and group classification, and the common and unique unsafe behaviors of different groups are analyzed. Secondly, the social network theory applies to establish the propagation network model of coal mine group unsafe behavior, and the distribution characteristics, propagation rules and internal attributes of group unsafe behavior are explored, and the key unsafe behaviors affecting network propagation are taken. Finally, put forward control measures. The results show that because of the differences in the work's nature of coal mine groups, there are common unsafe behaviors and unique unsafe behaviors. The coal mine communication network is closely related, highly relevant, and the information exchange is close. Managers and technicians are at the core and structural holes of the propagation network, and it is easier to control the spread of unsafe behavior. The key unsafe behaviors of the group mainly exist in technical personnel, management personnel and government supervision institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiangmei, Wang & Xiaoxiao, Geng & Wang, Yingchen, 2023. "Research on the network topology characteristics of unsafe behavior propagation in coal mine group from the perspective of human factors," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:85:y:2023:i:pa:s0301420723007316
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723007316
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qiao, Wanguan & Li, Xinchun & Liu, Quanlong, 2019. "Systemic approaches to incident analysis in coal mines: Comparison of the STAMP, FRAM and “2–4” models," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Ziwei Fa & Xinchun Li & Quanlong Liu & Zunxiang Qiu & Zhengyuan Zhai, 2021. "Correlation in Causality: A Progressive Study of Hierarchical Relations within Human and Organizational Factors in Coal Mine Accidents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaofang Wo & Guichen Li & Yuantian Sun & Jinghua Li & Sen Yang & Haoran Hao, 2022. "The Changing Tendency and Association Analysis of Intelligent Coal Mines in China: A Policy Text Mining Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Ismail, Siti Noraishah & Ramli, Azizan & Aziz, Hanida Abdul, 2021. "Influencing factors on safety culture in mining industry: A systematic literature review approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Roger Jensen & David P. Gilkey, 2023. "Risk-Reduction Research in Occupational Safety and Ergonomics: An Editorial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-4, March.
    4. Li Yang & Xue Wang & Junqi Zhu & Liyan Sun & Zhiyuan Qin, 2022. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Deep Coal Miners’ Unsafe Behavior Based on HFACS-CM-SEM-SD," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-29, August.
    5. Wei Jiang & Yun Li & Jiankai Zhou & Zhishun Huang & Zonghao Wu, 2021. "Comparative Study of the Hazardous Chemical Transportation Accident Analyses Using the CREAM Model and the 24Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Mahdieh Delikhoon & Esmaeil Zarei & Osiris Valdez Banda & Mohammad Faridan & Ehsanollah Habibi, 2022. "Systems Thinking Accident Analysis Models: A Systematic Review for Sustainable Safety Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-28, May.
    7. Jiangshi Zhang & Yongtun Li & Jingru Wu & Xiaofeng Ren & Yaona Wang & Hongfu Jia & Mengyu Xie, 2024. "Constructing a Coal Mine Safety Knowledge Graph to Promote the Association and Reuse of Risk Management Empirical Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Lei Chen & Hongxia Li & Shuicheng Tian, 2022. "Application of AHP and DEMATEL for Identifying Factors Influencing Coal Mine Practitioners’ Unsafe State," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:85:y:2023:i:pa:s0301420723007316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.