IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14511-d963683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of AHP and DEMATEL for Identifying Factors Influencing Coal Mine Practitioners’ Unsafe State

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Chen

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Institute of Safety and Emergency Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    School of Management, Henan Institute of Urban Construction, Pingdingshan 467000, China)

  • Hongxia Li

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Institute of Safety and Emergency Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    School of Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Shuicheng Tian

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Institute of Safety and Emergency Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

Abstract

Background: To effectively avoid accidents caused by practitioners’ unsafe state in the process of coal mine production processes, it is necessary to clarify the factors influencing the practitioners’ unsafe state, and take corresponding control measures accordingly. Methods: With the help of literature research and on-site interviews, grounded theory was used to construct the influencing factor index system of the coal mine practitioners’ unsafe state. The index system primary includes indices of four core categories, physiology, psychology, organization, and technology, and secondary indices of fourteen main categories. An AHP-DEMATEL model was constructed to calculate the comprehensive degree of influence of each influencing factor and rank it. Results: The results show that the main factors affecting the coal mine practitioners’ unsafe state are physical quality, degree of fatigue, safety attitude, safety awareness, safety culture, and vigilance. Physical quality and degree of fatigue are the key factors that affect the coal mine practitioners’ unsafe state, which is more consistent with the actual situation of coal mine practitioners. With the findings of this study, coal mine managers can take relevant countermeasures to intervene in coal mine practitioners’ unsafe state and reduce the occurrence of accidents.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Chen & Hongxia Li & Shuicheng Tian, 2022. "Application of AHP and DEMATEL for Identifying Factors Influencing Coal Mine Practitioners’ Unsafe State," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14511-:d:963683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14511/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14511/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niam Yaraghi & Roland G. Langhe, 2011. "Critical success factors for risk management systems," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(5), pages 551-581, May.
    2. Zhaobo Chen & Gangzhu Qiao & Jianchao Zeng, 2019. "Study on the Relationship between Worker States and Unsafe Behaviours in Coal Mine Accidents Based on a Bayesian Networks Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Ziwei Fa & Xinchun Li & Quanlong Liu & Zunxiang Qiu & Zhengyuan Zhai, 2021. "Correlation in Causality: A Progressive Study of Hierarchical Relations within Human and Organizational Factors in Coal Mine Accidents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Yuanlong Li & Xiang Wu & Xiaowei Luo & Jingqi Gao & Wenwen Yin, 2019. "Impact of Safety Attitude on the Safety Behavior of Coal Miners in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Xue Yang & Yang Tian & Kai Feng & Juan Yang & Shu-hui Zhang & Shengnan Wang, 2020. "Signal Game Analysis on the Effectiveness of Coal Mine Safety Supervision Based on the Affective Events Theory," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-9, June.
    6. Beynon, Malcolm, 2002. "An analysis of distributions of priority values from alternative comparison scales within AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 104-117, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin He & Dongliang Yuan & Lianwei Ren & Ming Huang & Wenyu Zhang & Jie Tan, 2023. "Evaluation Model Research of Coal Mine Intelligent Construction Based on FDEMATEL-ANP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Mitra Hannani & Marc Bascompta & Mojtaba Gerami Sabzevar & Hesam Dehghani & Ali Asghar Khajevandi, 2023. "Causal Analysis of Safety Risk Perception of Iranian Coal Mining Workers Using Fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Inmaculada Silla & Francisco J. Gracia & José M. Peiró, 2020. "Upward Voice: Participative Decision Making, Trust in Leadership and Safety Climate Matter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Ismail, Siti Noraishah & Ramli, Azizan & Aziz, Hanida Abdul, 2021. "Influencing factors on safety culture in mining industry: A systematic literature review approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Li Yang & Xue Wang & Junqi Zhu & Liyan Sun & Zhiyuan Qin, 2022. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Deep Coal Miners’ Unsafe Behavior Based on HFACS-CM-SEM-SD," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-29, August.
    4. Xiaofang Wo & Guichen Li & Yuantian Sun & Jinghua Li & Sen Yang & Haoran Hao, 2022. "The Changing Tendency and Association Analysis of Intelligent Coal Mines in China: A Policy Text Mining Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Donghun Lee & Hyungju Kim & Kwiyeon Koo & Sooyeon Kwon, 2024. "Human Reliability Analysis for Fishing Vessels in Korea Using Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-26, April.
    6. Jongseok Seo & Lidziya Lysiankova & Young-Seok Ock & Dongphil Chun, 2017. "Priorities of Coworking Space Operation Based on Comparison of the Hosts and Users’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-10, August.
    7. Carmen Nadia Ciocoiu & Adina Liliana Prioteasa & Sofia Elena Colesca, 2020. "Risk Management Implementation for Sustainable Development of Romanian SMEs: A Fuzzy Approach ...........," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(55), pages 726-726, August.
    8. Xiangmei, Wang & Xiaoxiao, Geng & Wang, Yingchen, 2023. "Research on the network topology characteristics of unsafe behavior propagation in coal mine group from the perspective of human factors," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    9. Livhuwani Muthelo & Tebogo Maria Mothiba & Nancy Rambelani Malema & Masenyani Oupa Mbombi & Peter Modupi Mphekgwana, 2022. "Exploring Occupational Health and Safety Standards Compliance in the South African Mining Industry, Limpopo Province, Using Principal Component Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Lai, Po‐Lin & Potter, Andrew & Beynon, Malcolm & Beresford, Anthony, 2015. "Evaluating the efficiency performance of airports using an integrated AHP/DEA-AR technique," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 75-85.
    11. Mukherjee, Krishnendu, 2014. "Analytic hierarchy process and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution: a bibliometric analysis from past, present and future of AHP and TOPSIS," MPRA Paper 59887, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Tohid Atashbar, 2013. "Iranian Disease: Why a Developing Country's Government Did Not Listen to Economists' Advices," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 732-760, July.
    13. Adina-Liliana PRIOTEASA & Carmen Nadia CIOCOIU, 2017. "Challenges In Implementing Risk Management: A Review Of The Literature," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 972-980, November.
    14. Lan, He & Ma, Xiaoxue & Qiao, Weiliang & Ma, Laihao, 2022. "On the causation of seafarers’ unsafe acts using grounded theory and association rule," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    15. Ozdemir, Mujgan S. & Saaty, Thomas L., 2006. "The unknown in decision making: What to do about it," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 349-359, October.
    16. Roger Jensen & David P. Gilkey, 2023. "Risk-Reduction Research in Occupational Safety and Ergonomics: An Editorial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-4, March.
    17. Atashbar, Tohid, 2012. "Illusion therapy: How to impose an economic shock without social pain," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 99-111.
    18. Lixia Niu & Rui Zhao, 2022. "The Effect of Safety Attitudes on Coal Miners’ Human Errors: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Meiyi Jiang & Xiaoping Xue & Lijuan Zhang & Yuying Chen & Cheng Zhao & Haiyan Song & Nan Wang, 2022. "Peanut Drought Risk Zoning in Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Li, Wanzhen & Zhou, Lujie & Hao, Jian & Yu, Kai & Chen, Jing & Liu, Pingping & Feng, Rui, 2023. "Dynamic simulation and control strategy exploration of the unsafe behavior of coal mine employees," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14511-:d:963683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.