IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i1p412-d1312304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Performance Path of Industrial Green Total Factor Productivity in the Context of High-Quality Development—Based on Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yahong Feng

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710065, China)

  • Xinyi Cheng

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710065, China)

  • Ruihua Liu

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710065, China)

Abstract

Improving industrial green total factor productivity (GTFP) is essential for achieving high-quality industrial development in China. To explore this perspective, we examined 30 provinces as case samples and applied a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis in order to analyze the factors of technological innovation, human capital, green consumption, environmental regulation, the Internet, and external openness in relation to industrial GTFP. The findings of this study show that the configuration path of industrial GTFP has multiple concurrencies. Specifically, three paths were identified as leading to high industrial GTFP, namely, the “total factor type”, “open-technology drive type”, and “technology-human drive type”. Meanwhile, the two configuration paths of non-high-industrial GTFP displayed an asymmetric relationship. Overall, these findings are crucial in revealing the path to improving industrial GTFP and achieving high-quality industrial development in China. The “total-factor-type” and “open-technology-drive-type” paths were the most prevalent in the eastern region, while the central area leaned more towards the “technology-human drive type”. This study offers valuable recommendations and insights for policymakers and scholars interested in promoting the development of industrial GTFP.

Suggested Citation

  • Yahong Feng & Xinyi Cheng & Ruihua Liu, 2024. "Research on the Performance Path of Industrial Green Total Factor Productivity in the Context of High-Quality Development—Based on Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:412-:d:1312304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/412/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/412/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kadri Männasoo & Heili Hein & Raul Ruubel, 2018. "The contributions of human capital, R&D spending and convergence to total factor productivity growth," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(12), pages 1598-1611, December.
    2. Dierk Herzer & Julian Donaubauer, 2018. "The long-run effect of foreign direct investment on total factor productivity in developing countries: a panel cointegration analysis," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 309-342, March.
    3. Kaifeng Li & Yun Chen & Jingren Chen, 2023. "How to Improve Industrial Green Total Factor Productivity under Dual Carbon Goals? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Shuying Wang & Yifei Gao & Hongchang Zhou, 2022. "Research on Green Total Factor Productivity Enhancement Path from the Configurational Perspective—Based on the TOE Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Guihuan Yan & Liming Jiang & Chongqing Xu, 2022. "How Environmental Regulation Affects Industrial Green Total Factor Productivity in China: The Role of Internal and External Channels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    7. Song, Malin & Wang, Shuhong & Sun, Jing, 2018. "Environmental regulations, staff quality, green technology, R&D efficiency, and profit in manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1-14.
    8. Xueli Wang & Caizhi Sun & Song Wang & Zhixiong Zhang & Wei Zou, 2018. "Going Green or Going Away? A Spatial Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Environmental Regulations, Biased Technological Progress, and Green Total Factor Productivity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Shijin Wang, 2017. "Impact of FDI on energy efficiency: an analysis of the regional discrepancies in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(2), pages 1209-1222, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. YuBiao Hao & XueCheng Zhang, 2023. "The impact of environmental regulation on urban green output efficiency: evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5717-5735, June.
    2. Huang, Hongyun & Wang, Fengrong & Song, Malin & Balezentis, Tomas & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2021. "Green innovations for sustainable development of China: Analysis based on the nested spatial panel models," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Pan, Xiongfeng & Guo, Shucen & Han, Cuicui & Wang, Mengyang & Song, Jinbo & Liao, Xianchun, 2020. "Influence of FDI quality on energy efficiency in China based on seemingly unrelated regression method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    4. Zhou, Anhua & Li, Jun, 2021. "Investigate the impact of market reforms on the improvement of manufacturing energy efficiency under China’s provincial-level data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Dongdong Lu & Zilong Wang, 2023. "Towards green economic recovery: how to improve green total factor productivity," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3163-3185, October.
    6. Tao Ma & Xiaoxi Cao, 2022. "FDI, technological progress, and green total factor energy productivity: evidence from 281 prefecture cities in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(9), pages 11058-11088, September.
    7. Zhou, Di & Yin, Xiaoshuo & Xie, Dongchun, 2023. "Local governments’ environmental targets and green total factor productivity in Chinese cities," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Kai Xu & Bart Bossink & Qiang Chen, 2019. "Efficiency Evaluation of Regional Sustainable Innovation in China: A Slack-Based Measure (SBM) Model with Undesirable Outputs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Chong Huang & Kedong Yin & Hongbo Guo & Benshuo Yang, 2022. "Regional Differences and Convergence of Inter-Provincial Green Total Factor Productivity in China under Technological Heterogeneity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Guihuan Yan & Liming Jiang & Chongqing Xu, 2022. "How Environmental Regulation Affects Industrial Green Total Factor Productivity in China: The Role of Internal and External Channels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Jie Tao & Weidong Cao & Yebing Fang & Yujie Liu & Xueyan Wang & Haipeng Wei, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Differences and Spatial Spillovers of China’s Green Manufacturing under Environmental Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Shen Zhong & Aizhi Li & Jing Wu, 2023. "Eco-efficiency of freshwater aquaculture in China: an assessment considering the undesirable output of pollutant emissions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 3555-3576, April.
    13. Zhong Fang & Hua Bai & Yuriy Bilan, 2019. "Evaluation Research of Green Innovation Efficiency in China’s Heavy Polluting Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Zhou, Anhua & Xin, Ling & Li, Jun, 2022. "Assessing the impact of the carbon market on the improvement of China's energy and carbon emission performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    15. Zhang, Dongyang, 2021. "Green credit regulation, induced R&D and green productivity: Revisiting the Porter Hypothesis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    16. Yue Zhang & Hui Zhang & Haozhaoxing Liao & Xiang Sun & Lisi Jiang & Yufeng Wang & Yue Wang, 2024. "Heterogeneous Porter Effect or Crowded-Out Effect: Nonlinear Impact of Environmental Regulation on County-Level Green Total Factor Productivity of Pigs in the Yangtze River Basin of China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-33, September.
    17. Wen-Min Lu & Qian Long Kweh & Chung-Wei Wang, 2021. "Integration and application of rough sets and data envelopment analysis for assessments of the investment trusts industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 163-194, January.
    18. Franz R. Hahn, 2007. "Determinants of Bank Efficiency in Europe. Assessing Bank Performance Across Markets," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 31499, April.
    19. Alperovych, Yan & Hübner, Georges & Lobet, Fabrice, 2015. "How does governmental versus private venture capital backing affect a firm's efficiency? Evidence from Belgium," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 508-525.
    20. Chen, Ya & Pan, Yongbin & Liu, Haoxiang & Wu, Huaqing & Deng, Guangwei, 2023. "Efficiency analysis of Chinese universities with shared inputs: An aggregated two-stage network DEA approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:412-:d:1312304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.