IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8719-d1495036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Sustainable Biomass Conversion Technologies: A Review of Mathematical Modeling Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Sylwia Polesek-Karczewska

    (Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery, Polish Academy of Sciences, 80-231 Gdańsk, Poland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Paulina Hercel

    (Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery, Polish Academy of Sciences, 80-231 Gdańsk, Poland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Behrouz Adibimanesh

    (Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery, Polish Academy of Sciences, 80-231 Gdańsk, Poland
    Doctoral School, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Izabela Wardach-Świȩcicka

    (Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery, Polish Academy of Sciences, 80-231 Gdańsk, Poland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

The sustainable utilization of biomass, particularly troublesome waste biomass, has become one of the pathways to meet the urgent demand for providing energy safety and environmental protection. The variety of biomass hinders the design of energy devices and systems, which must be highly efficient and reliable. Along with the technological developments in this field, broad works have been carried out on the mathematical modeling of the processes to support design and optimization for decreasing the environmental impact of energy systems. This paper aims to provide an extensive review of the various approaches proposed in the field of the mathematical modeling of the thermochemical conversion of biomass. The general focus is on pyrolysis and gasification, which are considered among the most beneficial methods for waste biomass utilization. The thermal and flow issues accompanying fuel conversion, with the basic governing equations and closing relationships, are presented with regard to the micro- (single particle) and macro-scale (multi-particle) problems, including different approaches (Eulerian, Lagrangian, and mixed). The data-driven techniques utilizing artificial neural networks and machine learning, gaining increasing interest as complementary to the traditional models, are also presented. The impact of the complexity of the physicochemical processes and the upscaling problem on the variations in the modeling approaches are discussed. The advantages and limitations of the proposed models are indicated. Potential options for further development in this area are outlined. The study shows that efforts towards obtaining reliable predictions of process characteristics while preserving reasonable computational efficiency result in a variety of modeling methods. These contribute to advancing environmentally conscious energy solutions in line with the global sustainability goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylwia Polesek-Karczewska & Paulina Hercel & Behrouz Adibimanesh & Izabela Wardach-Świȩcicka, 2024. "Towards Sustainable Biomass Conversion Technologies: A Review of Mathematical Modeling Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-43, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8719-:d:1495036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8719/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8719/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Safarian, Sahar & Ebrahimi Saryazdi, Seyed Mohammad & Unnthorsson, Runar & Richter, Christiaan, 2020. "Artificial neural network integrated with thermodynamic equilibrium modeling of downdraft biomass gasification-power production plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Ábrego, Javier & Plaza, Daniel & Luño, Francisco & Atienza-Martínez, María & Gea, Gloria, 2018. "Pyrolysis of cashew nutshells: Characterization of products and energy balance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 72-80.
    3. Ghorbani, Saba & Atashkari, Kazem & Borji, Mehdi, 2022. "Three-stage model-based evaluation of a downdraft biomass gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 734-745.
    4. Kim, Jun Young & Shin, Ui Hyeon & Kim, Kwangsu, 2023. "Predicting biomass composition and operating conditions in fluidized bed biomass gasifiers: An automated machine learning approach combined with cooperative game theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    5. Ascher, Simon & Sloan, William & Watson, Ian & You, Siming, 2022. "A comprehensive artificial neural network model for gasification process prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    6. Zeng, Kuo & Soria, José & Gauthier, Daniel & Mazza, Germán & Flamant, Gilles, 2016. "Modeling of beech wood pellet pyrolysis under concentrated solar radiation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 721-729.
    7. Patra, Tapas Kumar & Sheth, Pratik N., 2015. "Biomass gasification models for downdraft gasifier: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 583-593.
    8. Wardach-Świȩcicka, Izabela & Kardaś, Dariusz, 2021. "Modelling thermal behaviour of a single solid particle pyrolysing in a hot gas flow," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    9. Gambarotta, Agostino & Morini, Mirko & Zubani, Andrea, 2018. "A non-stoichiometric equilibrium model for the simulation of the biomass gasification process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 119-127.
    10. Huaqing Ma & Xiuhao Xia & Lianyong Zhou & Chao Xu & Zihan Liu & Tao Song & Guobin Zou & Yanlei Liu & Ze Huang & Xiaoling Liao & Yongzhi Zhao, 2023. "A Comparative Study of the Performance of Different Particle Models in Simulating Particle Charging and Burden Distribution in a Blast Furnace within the DEM Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qi, Jingwei & Wang, Yijie & Xu, Pengcheng & Hu, Ming & Huhe, Taoli & Ling, Xiang & Yuan, Haoran & Chen, Yong, 2024. "Study on the Co-gasification characteristics of biomass and municipal solid waste based on machine learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    2. Zhang, Jingxin & Hu, Qiang & Qu, Yiyuan & Dai, Yanjun & He, Yiliang & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Tong, Yen Wah, 2020. "Integrating food waste sorting system with anaerobic digestion and gasification for hydrogen and methane co-production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    3. Ascher, Simon & Watson, Ian & You, Siming, 2022. "Machine learning methods for modelling the gasification and pyrolysis of biomass and waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Elmaz, Furkan & Yücel, Özgün & Mutlu, Ali Yener, 2020. "Predictive modeling of biomass gasification with machine learning-based regression methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.
    6. Vera Marcantonio & Luisa Di Paola & Marcello De Falco & Mauro Capocelli, 2023. "Modeling of Biomass Gasification: From Thermodynamics to Process Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-30, October.
    7. Michael Binns & Hafiz Muhammad Uzair Ayub, 2021. "Model Reduction Applied to Empirical Models for Biomass Gasification in Downdraft Gasifiers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Kargbo, Hannah O. & Zhang, Jie & Phan, Anh N., 2021. "Optimisation of two-stage biomass gasification for hydrogen production via artificial neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    9. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    10. Lv, Xuefei & Lv, Ying & Zhu, Yiping, 2023. "Multi-variable study and MOPSO-based multi-objective optimization of a novel cogeneration plant using biomass fuel and geothermal energy: A complementary hybrid design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    11. Ayub, Yousaf & Ren, Jingzheng & Shi, Tao & Shen, Weifeng & He, Chang, 2023. "Poultry litter valorization: Development and optimization of an electro-chemical and thermal tri-generation process using an extreme gradient boosting algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    12. Mohd Zeeshan & Rohan R. Pande & Purnanand V. Bhale, 2024. "A modeling study for the gasification of refuse-derived fuel as an alternative to waste disposal," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 23985-24008, September.
    13. Yao, Xiwen & Zhao, Zhicheng & Li, Jishuo & Zhang, Bohan & Zhou, Haodong & Xu, Kaili, 2020. "Experimental investigation of physicochemical and slagging characteristics of inorganic constituents in ash residues from gasification of different herbaceous biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    14. Ábrego, J. & Atienza-Martínez, M. & Plou, F. & Arauzo, J., 2019. "Heat requirement for fixed bed pyrolysis of beechwood chips," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 145-157.
    15. Monteiro, Eliseu & Ismail, Tamer M. & Ramos, Ana & Abd El-Salam, M. & Brito, Paulo & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Experimental and modeling studies of Portuguese peach stone gasification on an autothermal bubbling fluidized bed pilot plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 862-877.
    16. Vakalis, Stergios & Moustakas, Konstantinos, 2019. "Modelling of advanced gasification systems (MAGSY): Simulation and validation for the case of the rising co-current reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 526-533.
    17. Patra, Tapas Kumar & Nimisha, K.R. & Sheth, Pratik N., 2016. "A comprehensive dynamic model for downdraft gasifier using heat and mass transport coupled with reaction kinetics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 1230-1242.
    18. Ndindeng, Sali Atanga & Wopereis, Marco & Sanyang, Sidi & Futakuchi, Koichi, 2019. "Evaluation of fan-assisted rice husk fuelled gasifier cookstoves for application in sub-Sahara Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 924-935.
    19. Salem, Ahmed M. & Abd Elbar, Ayman Refat, 2023. "The feasibility and performance of using producer gas as a gasifying medium," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    20. Samiran, Nor Afzanizam & Jaafar, Mohammad Nazri Mohd & Ng, Jo-Han & Lam, Su Shiung & Chong, Cheng Tung, 2016. "Progress in biomass gasification technique – With focus on Malaysian palm biomass for syngas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1047-1062.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8719-:d:1495036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.