IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8363-d1486112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics in Urban Green Space via Intensity Analysis and Landscape Pattern Indices: A Case Study of Taiyuan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Liu

    (Faculty of Design and Architecture, Department of Landscape Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
    Department of Design and Art, Taiyuan Institute of Technology, Taiyuan 030008, China)

  • Mohd Johari Mohd Yusof

    (Faculty of Design and Architecture, Department of Landscape Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Balqis Mohamed Rehan

    (Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Junainah Abu Kasim

    (Kuala Lumpur City Hall, Kuala Lumpur 50350, Malaysia)

Abstract

Urban green space (UGS) is a crucial physical area that supports the functioning of urban ecosystems, and its changes affect urban ecological balance. In order to accurately analyze the dynamic processes and transfer targets of UGS during urbanization, this study proposes a new method of UGS assessment based on multi-temporal Landsat remote sensing data. This method is integrated with intensity analysis and landscape pattern indices so as to explore the spatio-temporal dynamics of the evolution process, landscape pattern, and driving forces of UGS from 2000 to 2022 in the resource-based city of Taiyuan in central China. The results of the case study show that rapid urbanization brought about a continuous reduction in UGS in the study area, but the trend of decreasing gradually slowed down; UGS patches have become more dispersed and isolated, bare land has been targeted for both gains and losses of UGS, and ecological restoration of bare land mitigated the rapid reduction of UGS. The results of this study not only confirm the applicability of this methodology for monitoring and assessing the evolution of UGS, but also reveal the identification of the targeting or avoidance of other categories during the conversion of UGS. Thus, the potential factors influencing changes in UGS can be analyzed to guide and safeguard sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Liu & Mohd Johari Mohd Yusof & Balqis Mohamed Rehan & Junainah Abu Kasim, 2024. "Assessment of the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics in Urban Green Space via Intensity Analysis and Landscape Pattern Indices: A Case Study of Taiyuan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8363-:d:1486112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8363/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8363/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Zhen & Chen, Ruishan & Meadows, Michael E. & Sengupta, Dhritiraj & Xu, Di, 2019. "Changing urban green spaces in Shanghai: trends, drivers and policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yaoyao Zhu & Gabriel Hoh Teck Ling, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Morphological Transformation of Urban Open Spaces: Drivers, Trends, and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Fuhao & Chang, Yu-Fang, 2023. "Towards net-zero emissions: Can green bond policy promote green innovation and green space?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    3. Hua Xia & Shidong Ge & Xinyu Zhang & Gunwoo Kim & Yakai Lei & Yang Liu, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Green Infrastructure in an Agricultural Peri-Urban Area: A Case Study of Baisha District in Zhengzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Zhen Yang & Weijun Gao, 2022. "Evaluating the Coordinated Development between Urban Greening and Economic Growth in Chinese Cities during 2005 to 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-25, August.
    5. Kelei Li & Wenpeng Du & Zhiqi Yang & Huimin Yan & Yutong Mu, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Pattern of Urban Green Space in Chengdu Urban Center under Rapid Urbanization: From the Policy-Oriented Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Chunyu Chen & Linglan Bi & Kuanfan Zhu, 2021. "Study on Spatial-Temporal Change of Urban Green Space in Yangtze River Economic Belt and Its Driving Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Yonggeng Xiong & Min Xu & Yan Zhao, 2024. "Resident Preferences for Urban Green Spaces in Response to Pandemic Public Health Emergency: A Case Study of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-25, April.
    8. Wang, Jie & Zhang, Yuzhen & Zhang, Xiaoling & Song, Mengqiao & Ye, Jianping, 2023. "The spatio-temporal trends of urban green space and its interactions with urban growth: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta region, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    9. Nordström, Jonas & Hammarlund, Cecilia, 2021. "You win some, you lose some - compensating the loss of green space in cities taking heterogeneous population characteristics into consideration," AgriFood-WP 2021:3, Lund University, AgriFood Economics Centre.
    10. Dian Li & Ziheng Shangguan & Malan Huang & Xinyue Zhang & Lu Tang, 2022. "Impacts of Urban Development on Regional Green Development Efficiency—A Case of the Yangtze River Delta in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Jonas Nordström & Cecilia Hammarlund, 2021. "You Win Some, You Lose Some: Compensating the Loss of Green Space in Cities Considering Heterogeneous Population Characteristics," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Huimin Wang & Canrui Lin & Sihua Ou & Qianying Feng & Kui Guo & Xiaojian Wei & Jiazhou Xie, 2024. "Multilevel Change of Urban Green Space and Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity Analysis of Driving Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Noé Villegas Flores & Yelinca Saldeño Madero & Camilo Alberto Torres Parra & Isidoro Fasolino & Hugo Alexander Rondón Quintana, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Approach for Prioritizing and Managing Public Investment in Urban Spaces. A Case Study in the Triple Frontier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    14. Zakharov, Konstantin & Mizgajski, Andrzej, 2024. "Socioeconomic and political settings for the land development decreasing urban green. Inside view from Moscow," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    15. Weiwei Zhang & Jigang Han & Abiot Molla & Shudi Zuo & Yin Ren, 2021. "The Optimization Strategy of the Existing Urban Green Space Soil Monitoring System in Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-14, April.
    16. Liu, Jie & Zhang, Lang & Zhang, Qingping & Li, Chao & Zhang, Guilian & Wang, Yuncai, 2022. "Spatiotemporal evolution differences of urban green space: A comparative case study of Shanghai and Xuchang in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    17. Jiangxi Chen & Siyu Shao & Yifei Zhu & Yu Wang & Fujie Rao & Xilei Dai & Dayi Lai, 2022. "Enhanced Automatic Identification of Urban Community Green Space Based on Semantic Segmentation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Siddique, Sumaiya & Uddin, Md. Mahin, 2022. "Green space dynamics in response to rapid urbanization: Patterns, transformations and topographic influence in Chattogram city, Bangladesh," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    19. Yishao Shi & Danxuan Liu, 2020. "Relationship between Urban New Business Indexes and the Business Environment of Chinese Cities: A Study Based on Entropy-TOPSIS and a Gaussian Process Regression Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Liu Tian & Yongcai Li & Jun Lu & Jue Wang, 2021. "Review on Urban Heat Island in China: Methods, Its Impact on Buildings Energy Demand and Mitigation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8363-:d:1486112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.