IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i18p8105-d1479539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Primacy Evaluation and Pattern Evolution Mechanism of the Central City in Nanjing Metropolitan Area

Author

Listed:
  • Congjian Chen

    (College of Construction Engineering, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing 210019, China)

  • Qing Zhong

    (College of Construction Engineering, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing 210019, China)

  • Yang Cao

    (College of Construction Engineering, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing 210019, China)

  • Guangfu Xu

    (Science and Technology Department, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing 210019, China)

  • Bing Chen

    (Nanjing Gardening-Landscaping Economic Development Limited Liability Company, Nanjing 210000, China)

Abstract

Economic globalisation has accelerated the cross-regional flow of resource elements and broken through the constraints of traditional regional administrative boundaries. Urban agglomerations are core carriers that drive and accelerate regional integration development and can promote the division of urban functions and cooperation. This study considers the Nanjing metropolitan area as a case study to construct a comprehensive first-degree evaluation index system for cities from a factor-flow perspective, focusing on economic, cultural, and transportation connections. We found that (1) Nanjing, which has long been ranked first, shows a downward trending score, dropping from 0.956 in 2017 to 0.937 in 2023; (2) The comprehensive first-degree spatial structure of metropolitan-area cities presents a network hierarchical development feature of “one core, multiple centres, and multiple areas”. With Nanjing as the regional core city, Chuzhou (0.879), Yangzhou (0.915), and Wuhu (0.897) as sub-centre cities, and other cities as sub-regional nodes, the urban system structure gradually forms; (3) The indicators of economic (0.166 **), cultural (0.226 **), and transportation (0.644 ***) element connections were interrelated and mutually reinforced, forming a unified entity with internal connections. This study quantitatively measured the level of integrated development in the Nanjing metropolitan area and provided a reference for formulating regional policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Congjian Chen & Qing Zhong & Yang Cao & Guangfu Xu & Bing Chen, 2024. "The Primacy Evaluation and Pattern Evolution Mechanism of the Central City in Nanjing Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-23, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8105-:d:1479539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/8105/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/8105/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Gornig & Jan Goebel, 2018. "Deindustrialisation and the polarisation of household incomes: The example of urban agglomerations in Germany," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(4), pages 790-806, March.
    2. Patricia C Melo & Daniel J Graham & David Levinson & Sarah Aarabi, 2017. "Agglomeration, accessibility and productivity: Evidence for large metropolitan areas in the US," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(1), pages 179-195, January.
    3. Wensheng Zheng & Nanqiao Du & Xiaofang Wang, 2022. "Understanding the City-transport System of Urban Agglomeration through Improved Space Syntax Analysis," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 45(2), pages 161-187, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dennis Gaus & Georg Hirte, 2023. "Agglomeration or Market Access? The Defining Factors of Firms' Location Choice," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2045, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Banal-Estanol, Albert & Seldeslachts, Jo & Vives, Xavier, 2022. "Ownership Diversification and Product Market Pricing Incentives," CEPR Discussion Papers 17686, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Peng Gao & Dan He & Zhijing Sun & Yuemin Ning, 2020. "Characterizing functionally integrated regions in the Central Yangtze River Megaregion from a city‐network perspective," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1357-1379, September.
    4. Chakravarty, Dwarka & Goerzen, Anthony & Musteen, Martina & Ahsan, Mujtaba, 2021. "Global cities: A multi-disciplinary review and research agenda," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(3).
    5. Longlong Zhang & Jingwen Yuan & Chulsoo Kim, 2022. "Sustainable Planning and Design of Ocean City Spatial Forms Based on Space Syntax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Mengying Cui & David Levinson, 2020. "Primal and Dual Access," Working Papers 2022-01, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    7. Xu Dong & Yang Chen & Qinqin Zhuang & Yali Yang & Xiaomeng Zhao, 2022. "Agglomeration of Productive Services, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Green Total Factor Productivity: An Empirical Analysis Based on 68 Prefectural-Level-and-Above Cities in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Zhou, You & Zhang, Lingzhu & JF Chiaradia, Alain, 2022. "Estimating wider economic impacts of transport infrastructure Investment: Evidence from accessibility disparity in Hong Kong," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 220-235.
    9. Yan, Siqi & Peng, Jianchao & Wu, Qun, 2020. "Exploring the non-linear effects of city size on urban industrial land use efficiency: A spatial econometric analysis of cities in eastern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Jiang Du & Mengqin Zhao & Ming Zeng & Kezhen Han & Huaping Sun, 2020. "Spatial Effects of Urban Agglomeration on Energy Efficiency: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Anthony Howell & Chong Liu & Rudai Yang, 2020. "Explaining the urban premium in Chinese cities and the role of place-based policies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(7), pages 1332-1356, October.
    12. Gornig, Martin & Schiersch, Alexander, 2019. "Agglomeration economies and firm TFP: different effects across industries," VfS Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy 203597, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    13. Lee, Jae Kwang, 2021. "Transport infrastructure investment, accessibility change and firm productivity: Evidence from the Seoul region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    14. Miwa, Norihiro & Bhatt, Ayushman & Morikawa, So & Kato, Hironori, 2022. "High-Speed rail and the knowledge economy: Evidence from Japan," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 398-416.
    15. Juan C Duque & Nancy Lozano-Gracia & Jorge E Patino & Paula Restrepo, 2022. "Urban form and productivity: What shapes are Latin-American cities?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(1), pages 131-150, January.
    16. David Levinson & Hao Wu, 2020. "Towards a general theory of access," Working Papers 2022-01, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    17. Yu, Binbin & Zhou, Xinru, 2023. "Urban administrative hierarchy and urban land use efficiency: Evidence from Chinese cities," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 178-195.
    18. Zhongqi Xie & Ying Zhang & Zhiqiang Fang, 2022. "High-Quality Development Evaluation and Spatial Evolution Analysis of Urban Agglomerations in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Gustavo A. García, 2019. "Agglomeration economies in the presence of an informal sector: the Colombian case," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(2), pages 355-388.
    20. Florian Mayneris, 2017. "Effets des infrastructures de transport sur le niveau et la localisation des activités économiques," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2017023, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8105-:d:1479539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.