IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7673-d1471097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Suitable Site Selection of Concentrating Solar Power Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Hichem Farsi

    (Laboratory of Energy Mechanics and Conversion Systems, University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene (USTHB), BP 32, Bab Ezzouar, Algiers 16111, Algeria)

  • Rabah Dizene

    (Laboratory of Energy Mechanics and Conversion Systems, University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene (USTHB), BP 32, Bab Ezzouar, Algiers 16111, Algeria)

  • Gilles Flamant

    (Processes, Materials and Solar Energy Laboratory, PROMES-CNRS, 7, Rue du Four Solaire, 66120 Font Romeu, France)

  • Gilles Notton

    (Science for Environment Laboratory, University of Corsica, UMR CNRS 6134, 20000 Ajaccio, France)

Abstract

The present paper deals with the application of a Multi-Criteria Evaluation approach (MCE) to carry out site selection for Concentrating Solar Power plants (CSP). As this work demonstrates, multi-criteria analysis can provide a technical–scientific decision making tool capable of justifying choices in a clear and coherent manner, particularly in the renewable energy sector. The site selection for CSP is a complex topic. Although it has a significant impact on project costs, this issue has received little attention in the literature. A practical methodology based on a multi-criteria analysis is presented. Several potential sites called alternatives are compared, using a combination of Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods (MCDM) such as the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Scoring method and Benayoun and Tergny Algorithm. The relevance of this combination is examined through a case study of Algeria, a country with a high potential for CSP projects. The comparative analysis is carried out for a set of alternatives (Kenadsa, Abdala, Naâma and Hassi R’Mel). The assessment of alternatives and their ranking are discussed according to several scenarios, both for approaches used to estimate the criteria weights (AHP, weights affected in different manner) and for the two MCDM methods chosen for the present study. The methodology provides a better understanding of the site selection process for CSP, which would encourage their large-scale deployment on the green electricity market.

Suggested Citation

  • Hichem Farsi & Rabah Dizene & Gilles Flamant & Gilles Notton, 2024. "Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Suitable Site Selection of Concentrating Solar Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7673-:d:1471097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7673/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7673/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giamalaki, Marina & Tsoutsos, Theocharis, 2019. "Sustainable siting of solar power installations in Mediterranean using a GIS/AHP approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 64-75.
    2. Chen, Fuying & Yang, Qing & Zheng, Niting & Wang, Yuxuan & Huang, Junling & Xing, Lu & Li, Jianlan & Feng, Shuanglei & Chen, Guoqian & Kleissl, Jan, 2022. "Assessment of concentrated solar power generation potential in China based on Geographic Information System (GIS)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    3. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    4. Al-Yahyai, Sultan & Charabi, Yassine & Gastli, Adel & Al-Badi, Abdullah, 2012. "Wind farm land suitability indexing using multi-criteria analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 80-87.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neissi, Lamya & Albaji, Mohammad & Boroomand Nasab, Saeed, 2020. "Combination of GIS and AHP for site selection of pressurized irrigation systems in the Izeh plain, Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Geovanna Villacreses & Diego Jijón & Juan Francisco Nicolalde & Javier Martínez-Gómez & Franz Betancourt, 2022. "Multicriteria Decision Analysis of Suitable Location for Wind and Photovoltaic Power Plants on the Galápagos Islands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Colak, H. Ebru & Memisoglu, Tugba & Gercek, Yasin, 2020. "Optimal site selection for solar photovoltaic (PV) power plants using GIS and AHP: A case study of Malatya Province, Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 565-576.
    4. Dehghan, Hassan & Pourfayaz, Fathollah & Shahsavari, Ardavan, 2022. "Multicriteria decision and Geographic Information System-based locational analysis and techno-economic assessment of a hybrid energy system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 189-199.
    5. Shao, Meng & Zhao, Yuanxu & Sun, Jinwei & Han, Zhixin & Shao, Zhuxiao, 2023. "A decision framework for tidal current power plant site selection based on GIS-MCDM: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    6. Alphan, Hakan, 2024. "Incorporating visibility information into multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) for wind turbine deployment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).
    7. Sánchez-Lozano, J.M. & García-Cascales, M.S. & Lamata, M.T., 2016. "GIS-based onshore wind farm site selection using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods. Evaluating the case of Southeastern Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 86-102.
    8. Muhammad Mohsin & Yin Hengbin & Zhang Luyao & Li Rui & Qian Chong & Ana Mehak, 2022. "An Application of Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis for Risk Prioritization and Management: A Case Study of the Fisheries Sector in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Shao, Meng & Han, Zhixin & Sun, Jinwei & Xiao, Chengsi & Zhang, Shulei & Zhao, Yuanxu, 2020. "A review of multi-criteria decision making applications for renewable energy site selection," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 377-403.
    10. Buchmayr, A. & Taelman, S.E. & Thomassen, G. & Verhofstadt, E. & Van Ootegem, L. & Dewulf, J., 2023. "A distance-to-sustainability-target approach for indicator aggregation and its application for the comparison of wind energy alternatives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    11. Stein, Eric W., 2013. "A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 640-654.
    12. Keroglou, I. & Tsoutsos, T., 2024. "Optimal siting of solar desalination plants in Crete, Greece employing a GIS/MCDM approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    13. Banai, Reza, 2010. "Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the Analytic Network Process," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 85-112.
    14. Fatih Yiğit & Şakir Esnaf, 2021. "A new Fuzzy C-Means and AHP-based three-phased approach for multiple criteria ABC inventory classification," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1517-1528, August.
    15. Rachele Corticelli & Margherita Pazzini & Cecilia Mazzoli & Claudio Lantieri & Annarita Ferrante & Valeria Vignali, 2022. "Urban Regeneration and Soft Mobility: The Case Study of the Rimini Canal Port in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    16. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    17. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    18. Seung-Jin Han & Won-Jae Lee & So-Hee Kim & Sang-Hoon Yoon & Hyunwoong Pyun, 2022. "Assessing Expected Long-term Benefits for the Olympic Games: Delphi-AHP Approach from Korean Olympic Experts," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    19. Denys Yemshanov & Frank H. Koch & Yakov Ben‐Haim & Marla Downing & Frank Sapio & Marty Siltanen, 2013. "A New Multicriteria Risk Mapping Approach Based on a Multiattribute Frontier Concept," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(9), pages 1694-1709, September.
    20. Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Srivastava, Praveen Ranjan & Eachempati, Prajwal & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar, 2024. "Exploring the impact of key performance factors on energy markets: From energy risk management perspectives," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7673-:d:1471097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.