IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7553-d1468506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workforce Sustainability in Our Aging Society: Exploring How the Burden–Burnout Mechanism Exacerbates the Turnover Intentions of Employees Who Combine Work and Informal Eldercare

Author

Listed:
  • Hedva Vinarski-Peretz

    (Department of Political Science, Public Administration and Public Policy, Yezreel Valley Academic College, Yezreel Valley 1930600, Israel)

  • Michal Mashiach-Eizenberg

    (Department of Health Systems Management, Yezreel Valley Academic College, Yezreel Valley 1930600, Israel)

  • Dafna Halperin

    (Department of Community Gerontology, Yezreel Valley Academic College, Yezreel Valley 1930600, Israel)

Abstract

Understanding the labor market participation shift associated with an aging population and the challenges of employees who provide care to old-age relatives is essential to ensure progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals. The current study focuses on the decision of employees who combine paid work with unpaid care to relatives aged 65 and above to stay or leave their jobs. We draw on the Turnover Model and the Informal Caregivers Integrative Model (ICIM) to examine how two primary stressors—care burden and work demand—one secondary stressor—work–family conflict—and emotional exhaustion increase the turnover intentions of employees who combine paid work with eldercare to their old relatives aged 65 and over. By synthesizing these two models and using a survey with three chronological waves among 356 Israeli employees, we analyze a mediation model within a Structural Equation Modeling framework. The findings underscore the fact that work–family conflict (a secondary stressor) and the sense of exhaustion act as key mediators in the relationship between employees’ primary stressors and turnover intentions. The presence of primary stressors in themselves does not increase turnover intentions. Our findings imply that, rather than providing sporadic adaptations at work, policymakers, organizations, and human resource management systems should respond proactively to prevent the process from undermining employees’ ability to achieve equilibrium between their desire to work and care for their old-age relatives. Such a proactive stance would reduce their exhaustion and turnover intention.

Suggested Citation

  • Hedva Vinarski-Peretz & Michal Mashiach-Eizenberg & Dafna Halperin, 2024. "Workforce Sustainability in Our Aging Society: Exploring How the Burden–Burnout Mechanism Exacerbates the Turnover Intentions of Employees Who Combine Work and Informal Eldercare," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7553-:d:1468506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7553/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7553/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bauer, Jan Michael & Sousa-Poza, Alfonso, 2015. "Impacts of Informal Caregiving on Caregiver Employment, Health, and Family," IZA Discussion Papers 8851, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Patricia M. Anderson & Bruce D. Meyer, 1994. "The Extent and Consequences of Job Turnover," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 25(1994 Micr), pages 177-248.
    3. Leigh, Andrew, 2010. "Informal care and labor market participation," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 140-149, January.
    4. Julie C. Lima & Susan M. Allen & Frances Goldscheider & Orna Intrator, 2008. "Spousal Caregiving in Late Midlife Versus Older Ages: Implications of Work and Family Obligations," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 63(4), pages 229-238.
    5. Julie Robison & Richard Fortinsky & Alison Kleppinger & Noreen Shugrue & Martha Porter, 2009. "A Broader View of Family Caregiving: Effects of Caregiving and Caregiver Conditions on Depressive Symptoms, Health, Work, and Social Isolation," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(6), pages 788-798.
    6. Nicole DePasquale & Kelly D. Davis & Steven H. Zarit & Phyllis Moen & Leslie B. Hammer & David M. Almeida, 2016. "Combining Formal and Informal Caregiving Roles: The Psychosocial Implications of Double- and Triple-Duty Care," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 71(2), pages 201-211.
    7. Hedva Vinarski-Peretz & Dafna Halperin, 2022. "Family Care in our Aging Society: Policy, Legislation and Intergenerational Relations: The Case of Israel," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 187-203, March.
    8. Peter J Jordan & Ashlea C Troth, 2020. "Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(1), pages 3-14, February.
    9. Carmichael, Fiona & Charles, Susan, 2003. "The opportunity costs of informal care: does gender matter?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 781-803, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heger, Dörte & Korfhage, Thorben, 2017. "Does the negative effect of caregiving on work persist over time?," Ruhr Economic Papers 703, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    2. Kolodziej, Ingo & Coe, Norma B. & Van Houtven, Courtney Harold, 2023. "Intensive informal care and impairments in work productivity and activity," Ruhr Economic Papers 1010, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    3. Norén, Anna, 2020. "Sick of my parents? Consequences of parental ill health on adult children," Working Paper Series 2020:1, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    4. Yoko Niimi, 2018. "Does providing informal elderly care hasten retirement? Evidence from Japan," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 1039-1062, August.
    5. Marie Blaise & Laetitia Dillenseger, 2020. "Informal caregivers and life satisfaction: Empirical Evidence from the Netherlands," Working Papers of BETA 2020-55, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    6. Jacobs, Josephine C. & Van Houtven, Courtney H. & Laporte, Audrey & Coyte, Peter C., 2015. "Baby Boomer caregivers in the workforce: Do they fare better or worse than their predecessors?," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 89-101.
    7. Nishimura, Y.; Oikawa, M.;, 2017. "Effects of Informal Elderly Care on Labor Supply: Exploitation of Government Intervention on the Supply Side of Elderly Care Market," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 17/02, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    8. Korfhage, Thorben & Fischer-Weckemann, Björn, 2024. "Long-run consequences of informal elderly care and implications of public long-term care insurance," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Zhu, Ge, 2024. "Liberated from care: Long-term care insurance policy and Employment for women," MPRA Paper 120472, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Rellstab, Sara & Bakx, Pieter & García-Gómez, Pilar & van Doorslaer, Eddy, 2020. "The kids are alright - labour market effects of unexpected parental hospitalisations in the Netherlands," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    11. Stephen Drinkwater, 2015. "Informal Caring and Labour Market Outcomes Within England and Wales," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 273-286, February.
    12. Nguyen, Ha Trong & Connelly, Luke Brian, 2014. "The effect of unpaid caregiving intensity on labour force participation: Results from a multinomial endogenous treatment model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 115-122.
    13. Marie Blaise & Laetitia Dillenseger, 2023. "Informal Caregivers and Life Satisfaction: Empirical Evidence from the Netherlands," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 1883-1930, August.
    14. Yoko Niimi, 2016. "The “Costs” of informal care: an analysis of the impact of elderly care on caregivers’ subjective well-being in Japan," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 779-810, December.
    15. Miller, Ray & Sedai, Ashish Kumar, 2022. "Opportunity costs of unpaid caregiving: Evidence from panel time diaries," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    16. Lee, Kangoh, 2023. "Working from home as an economic and social change: A review," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    17. Elisa Labbas & Maria Stanfors, 2023. "Does Caring for Parents Take Its Toll? Gender Differences in Caregiving Intensity, Coresidence, and Psychological Well-Being Across Europe," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 39(1), pages 1-29, December.
    18. Costa-Font, Joan & Vilaplana-Prieto, Cristina, 2023. "Caregiving subsidies and spousal early retirement intentions," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(4), pages 550-589, October.
    19. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2013-035 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Geyer, J.; Korfhage, T.;, 2017. "Long-term care reform and the labor supply of informal caregivers – evidence from a quasi-experiment," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 17/20, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    21. Signe A. Abrahamsen & Maja Weemes Grøtting, 2023. "Formal care of the elderly and health outcomes among adult daughters," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 436-461, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7553-:d:1468506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.