IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7309-d1463908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of ESG Regulation on Environmental Decoupling—An Exploratory Study on Polish Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Papa

    (Department of Economics and Finance, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy)

  • Monika Wieczorek-Kosmala

    (Faculty of Spatial Economy and Regions in Transition, University of Economics in Katowice, 40-287 Katowice, Poland)

  • Anna Losa

    (Faculty of Informatics and Communication, University of Economics in Katowice, 40-287 Katowice, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Swałek

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Economics in Katowice, 40-287 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

The sustainable finance framework implements the regulation to enhance firms’ sustainable reporting and increase market transparency in channeling funds. However, firms are under the pressure of going green and, thus, often demonstrate a propensity to environmental decoupling, which means the gap between what is told about environmental performance and what is truly done within. The main purpose of our exploratory work is to detect the environmental decoupling among sampled firms. The research problem relates to the effects of reporting requirements and aligning symptoms of environmental decoupling by comparing the increase in qualitative disclosures (talk) relative to measurable KPIs (real actions). We have empirically confirmed the potential problems of environmental decoupling within the environmental aspects other than carbon emissions. We have observed the improvement of qualitative disclosures, while the KPIs other than carbon-emission-related (use of resources and energy) confirmed no real actions. This result is aligned with the current policymakers’ focus on carbon emission reporting. Firms declare the implementation of policies and targets, but it does not fully drive real change. Our study contributes to the emerging strand of the literature on environmental decoupling, as well as offers implications for policymakers, to enhance the efficiency (and prevent environmental decoupling) within the new sustainable finance regulatory framework of the European Union.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Papa & Monika Wieczorek-Kosmala & Anna Losa & Aleksandra Swałek, 2024. "The Impact of ESG Regulation on Environmental Decoupling—An Exploratory Study on Polish Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-11, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7309-:d:1463908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7309/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7309/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Papa & Mario Carrassi & Anna Lucia Muserra & Monika Wieczorek-Kosmala, 2022. "The impact of the EU nonfinancial information directive on environmental disclosure: evidence from Italian environmentally sensitive industries," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(7), pages 87-120, March.
    2. Fernando Llena & Jose M. Moneva & Blanca Hernandez, 2007. "Environmental disclosures and compulsory accounting standards: the case of spanish annual reports," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 50-63, January.
    3. Kent Walker & Fang Wan, 2012. "The Harm of Symbolic Actions and Green-Washing: Corporate Actions and Communications on Environmental Performance and Their Financial Implications," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(2), pages 227-242, August.
    4. Olga Hawn & Ioannis Ioannou, 2016. "Mind the gap: The interplay between external and internal actions in the case of corporate social responsibility," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(13), pages 2569-2588, December.
    5. Maria Aluchna & Maria Roszkowska-Menkes & Bogumił Kamiński, 2022. "From talk to action: the effects of the non-financial reporting directive on ESG performance," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(7), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Carlos Larrinaga & Francisco Carrasco & Carmen Correa & Fernando Llena & Jose Moneva, 2002. "Accountability and accounting regulation: the case of the Spanish environmental disclosure standard," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 723-740.
    7. Shabana Talpur & Muhammad Nadeem & Helen Roberts, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility decoupling: a systematic literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(4), pages 878-909, January.
    8. Thomas P. Lyon & John W. Maxwell, 2011. "Greenwash: Corporate Environmental Disclosure under Threat of Audit," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 3-41, March.
    9. Michela Cordazzo & Laura Bini & Giuseppe Marzo, 2020. "Does the EU Directive on non‐financial information influence the value relevance of ESG disclosure? Italian evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3470-3483, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giorgio Mion & Cristian R. Loza Adaui, 2019. "Mandatory Nonfinancial Disclosure and Its Consequences on the Sustainability Reporting Quality of Italian and German Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-28, August.
    2. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    3. Flasher, R. & Luchs, C.K. & Souza, J.L., 2018. "Sustainability assurance provider participation in standard setting," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 20-25.
    4. Francesca Bernini & Fabio La Rosa, 2024. "Research in the greenwashing field: concepts, theories, and potential impacts on economic and social value," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 405-444, June.
    5. Wei Li & Weining Li & Veikko Seppänen & Timo Koivumäki, 2022. "How and when does perceived greenwashing affect employees' job performance? Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1722-1735, September.
    6. Dong, Ciwei & Huang, Qianzhi & Pan, Yuqing & Ng, Chi To & Liu, Renjun, 2023. "Logistics outsourcing: Effects of greenwashing and blockchain technology," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    7. Veronica P. Lima Ribeiro & Cristina Aibar‐Guzman, 2010. "Determinants of environmental accounting practices in local entities: evidence from Portugal," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(3), pages 404-419, August.
    8. Javier Parra-Domínguez & Fátima David & Tania Azevedo, 2021. "Family Firms and Coupling among CSR Disclosures and Performance," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Birindelli, Giuliana & Chiappini, Helen & Jalal, Raja Nabeel-Ud-Din, 2024. "Greenwashing, bank financial performance and the moderating role of gender diversity," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Despina Galani & Efthymios Gravas & Antonios Stavropoulos, 2012. "Company Characteristics and Environmental Policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 236-247, May.
    11. Carlos Larrinaga-Gonzélez & Vincente Pérez-Chamorro, 2008. "Sustainability Accounting and Accountability in Public Water Companies," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 337-343, December.
    12. Chaoyu Cao & Qibo Chen & Lili Zhu, 2024. "Corporate Greenwashing Unexpectedly Caused by the Green Credit Policy: A Comparison between Environmental Sustainability Information Disclosure and Actual Environmental Protection Investment from Chin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Yinglin Huang & Claude Francoeur & Stephen Brammer, 2022. "What drives and curbs brownwashing?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2518-2532, July.
    14. Marisa Agostini & Ericka Costa, 2012. "Mandatory disclosure about environmental and employee matters in Italian listed corporate groups' reports," Working Papers 6, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    15. Silvia Ruiz-Blanco & Silvia Romero & Belen Fernandez-Feijoo, 2022. "Green, blue or black, but washing–What company characteristics determine greenwashing?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 4024-4045, March.
    16. Florence Depoers & Tiphaine Jérôme, 2017. "Environmental expenditure disclosure strategies in a regulated context [Stratégies de publication des dépenses environnementales dans un cadre réglementaire]," Post-Print hal-01576195, HAL.
    17. Rick Hardcopf & Kevin Linderman & Rachna Shah, 2024. "Do Firms Follow through on Environmental Commitments? An Empirical Examination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-29, August.
    18. Zhang, Guanglong, 2023. "Regulatory-driven corporate greenwashing: Evidence from “low-carbon city” pilot policy in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    19. Torelli, Riccardo & Balluchi, Federica & Lazzini, Arianna, 2019. "Greenwashing and Environmental Communication: Effects on Stakeholders’ Perceptions," OSF Preprints 97vxn, Center for Open Science.
    20. Maryna Gulenko, 2018. "Mandatory CSR reporting—literature review and future developments in Germany [Nichtfinanzielle Berichterstattungspflicht – Literaturzusammenfassung und Mögliche Entwicklungen in Deutschland]," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 3-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7309-:d:1463908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.